WEEK 1 AND 2 Flashcards
What is the purpose of LITERATURE REVIEW?
- Identifies, evaluates and synthesises the relevant literature within a particular field of research
- It highlights:
- what has been done,
- what is generally accepted,
- what is the current state of thinking on a topic
- what is emerging
- what are the gaps in knowledge
- A critical analysis of published literature
- Integration of this information (don’t just summarise & report)
Synthesis vs summary
Narretive REVIEW vs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Scope of focus
search protocol
study selection
grade
lack of evidenc
advantaged and disadvantages of SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
ADVANTAGES
▪ Focused, specific research question (PICO)
▪ Comprehensive and Exhaustive
▪ Explicit Methodology (pre-specific criteria)
▪ Accurately assess quality & weight of evidence
▪ Reproducible
DISADVANTAGES
▪ Need to have a very specific question
▪ Need to be very specific about search criteria
▪ Long
▪ Generally requires pre-registration
▪ Requires multiple people
▪ Still subject to biases
▪ Reproducible
what is PROSPERO?
▪ An international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews in health & social care
▪ Funded by the National Institute for Health Research, UK.
▪ Aims:
1. To provide a comprehensive listing of systematic reviews registered at inception to help avoid duplication
2. To promote transparency in the process and thus minimize the risk of bias in the review
▪ Free to register
▪ Ideally done before screening against eligibility criteria commences.
▪ However, reviews are currently accepted for registration as long as they have not progressed beyond the
completion of data extraction
▪ Scoping reviews and literature reviews are not eligible for inclusion in PROSPERO.
META-ANALYSES
Meta-analyses
* Meta-analysis refers to the use of statistical techniques in a systematic review to
integrate the results of included studies
* Not a requirement & in some cases, it doesn’t make sense to perform one
* Generally NOT recommended to undertake a meta-analyses outside of a systematic
review
ORIGINS OF A GOOD RESEARCH QUESTION
▪ Guiding judgements of mentors (supervisors) who are experts in the area
▪ A review of the literature is a great first step in identifying “gaps in knowledge”
▪ Be alert to new ideas and techniques
▪ Creativity
▪ Tenacity (returning to a troublesome problem repeatedly)
▪ Conclusion from the research (regardless of the exact findings) would be impactful
STEPS IN A RESEARCH PROJECT
FORMULATING THE RESEARCH QUESTION
FINER
Objective of the study
The uncertainty or gap that the investigator wants to resolve
Begin general but often needs to be narrowed down to be ‘testable’ / ‘feasible’
Needs to meet the FINER formula (Hulley et al., 2001)
✓ Feasible (can be done/tested)
✓ Interesting (of interest/importance)
✓ Novel (not already done)
✓ Ethical (essential)
✓ Relevant (an implication,
meets the “so what test” (should contribute meaningfully to knowledge)
FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE - NARROW VS. BROAD QUESTIONS
Very broad questions
Difficult to ‘test’
Challenges with methods &
recruitment
Very narrow questions
May have limited generalizability
Could lead to biased
interpretations/conclusions
PICO
DIFFERENT TYPES OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS
6 types,
- INTERVENTIONS Treatments and therapies to treat a disease/condition
- AETIOLOGY, RISK FACTOR What causes the problem? Outcomes of an activity/exposure
- FREQUENCY What is the frequency of the problem?
- DIAGNOSIS Does this person have the problem?
- PROGNOSIS, PREDICTION Who will get the problem?
- PHENOMENA Observations of a situation
example of intervention, frequency, diagnosis and phenomena research question
Intervention : In people aged ≥70 years, is 100mg daily Aspirin, versus placebo,
effective in reducing the incidence of acute ischemic stroke
Frequency: In infants born prematurely, what is the subsequent lifetime prevalence
of sensory deafness compared to those born full-term?
Diagnosis : For pregnant women, is ultrasound plus serum biochemistry testing in the 1st
trimester as accurate (with equal or better sensitivity & specificity) as conventional
amniocentesis for diagnosing Down’s Syndrome?
Phenomena: contains P and O
Usually involve a population (P) and an outcome (O) but not an intervention or comparator.
Question is more open ended and informed by the study itself
For mothers of children with a fever, what are the principal concerns?
HYPOTHESIS TESTING
What is hypothesis ?
when is it required
A proposed explanation made on the basis of incomplete evidence, but used as a starting point for further
investigation
▪ A simplified & specific version of the research question that summarises the main elements of the study.
▪ Hypotheses are NOT needed for descriptive studies or observations of a phenomena
▪ BUT essential when any test of statistical significance will be used to compare findings among groups
▪ At least one hypothesis is being ‘tested’ in all experiments & most observational studies
▪ If any of the following terms appear in the research question a hypothesis should be formulated: greater than, less
than, causes, leads to, compared with, more likely than, related to, similar to, correlated with
▪ It MUST be stated in advance