Week 1-2 Variables & Visual Attention Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How to avoid ceiling/floor effects in cognitive studies?

A

Ceiling effects imply that the task is not difficult enough; while floor effects imply the task is too difficult.

It could imply that reaction speed or accuracy is being overly prioritised, resulting in overly fast or slow results. To reduce these effects, reaction time should be always compared with accuracy, which need to be optimised to an appropriate level of difficulty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is Signal detection theory?

A

Sensitivity vs response bias
Used in uncertain contexts

is a framework that discriminates a participant’s sensitivity of a target from their response bias, which refers to their tendency to respond to the target in a particular way (liberal vs. conservative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is signal detection theory used for?

A

Used in diagnosis, visual search tasks, when something may have been present
Used in force choice paradigms about detecting a target or what that target was

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 4 different responses in signal detection theory? (H-CR-M-FA)

A
  1. Hit = present, says present
  2. Correct rejection = not present, says not present
  3. Miss = present, says not present
  4. False alarm = not present, says present
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the difference between top-down and down-top attention?

A

Exogenous (down top) = attention is captured by salient bright, loud or intense stimulus that is unpredictable and is not goal-relevant

Endogenous (top down) attention is captured by longer, informative and predictable or goal-relevant cues by the individual, ie. purposely looking for something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the the early-attention theory? (Cherry, Treisman)

A

States that things are sensed from the environment, filtered out early before undergoing semantic analysis in the LTM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the the late-attention theory? + example

A
  • late selection processing states that irrelevant information still goes through semantic analysis before being filtered out after being deemed irrelevant

Example - hearing name in unfiltered stream

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is Lavie’s perceptual load Theory and how does it combine both early and late attention theories?

A

The theory states that perceptual load may be seen as a mediating factor between whether information is processed at an early/late stage

  • If perceptual load is high, (tons of stuff in the environment), then non-target stimuli is not processed and people are more likely to engage in early stage attention
  • Thus late-stage processing can only occur if the cognitive load/environmental stimuli is low
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is exogenous (down top) attention?

A
  • reflexively captured by salient (bright, loud, intense) stimuli in the environment
  • very short (100ms), quite unpredictable,
    -no goal-relevant utility, captured by salient features of the environment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is endogenous (top down) attention?

A

Attention shifted towards an informative que, longer cues (300ms),
Quite predictable but still arbitrary and goal relevant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How is overt and covert attention measured?

A
  1. Overt attention = eye tracking technology
  2. Covert attention = Posner Cueing Paradigm and RT’s as measurements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does Posner’s covert paradigm measure covert attention?

A
  1. A cue in random location (invalid cues) or exact location as target (valid cues) will show first
  2. Then you respond to target when shown after the cue
  3. Slower RT’s for cues further away (invalid cues) compared to cues at exact location (valid cues) convey time taken to shift attention covertly
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If response times (RTs) are equivalent on valid and invalid trials in a Posner cueing paradigm, what does this indicate that the cue has done to attention?

A

If response times (RTs) are equivalent on valid and invalid trials, that infers that the cues did not register in the participants attentional breadth.

As a result, covert attention cannot be accurately measured since the difference in RT times is used as the indicator of covert shift of attention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why does inhibition of return occur and when?

A

Inhibition of return is a negative cueing score, where the invalid cues produce faster responses than the valid cues.

This often occurs after a longer period of time between the cue and the target, and may reflect attention has been disengaged from the cued stimulus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does the Dot point paradigm use emotional stimuli to measure the role of emotion in covert attention?

A
  1. Exposes participants to emotional salient stimuli as a valid or invalid cue before asking them to respond as quickly as possible to a target,
  2. It was predicted that those with emotionally-salient cues would be faster at identifying the target where the emotionally salient cue was (congruent trial) and slower at identifying the target where the neutral cue was (incongruent trial)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the general findings of the emotional dot point paradigm and attentional biases towards emotional stimuli?

A

(Bar-Haim et al., 2007) found this only those with anxiety disorders displayed attentional biases towards the emotionally-salient stimuli in dot-point paradigms over neutral stimuli

17
Q

What is a limitation of the dot-point paradigm and how could it be improved?

A

Limitation: how do we know whether the participant was actually focusing on the emotional-salient cues?

Improvement: Combine the paradigm with behavioural DV’s like eye-tracking technology to ensure the participant was actually focusing on the emotional-salient cues

18
Q

How can Navon’s global and local letters be used to determine whether we have a broad or narrow attentional breadth?

A

You compare reaction times in congruent Navon stimuli, where both local and global letters are the same, and incongruent Navon stimuli, where the local and global letters differ

19
Q

What are the findings of Navon’s hierarchical figures task and what does it imply for attentional breadth?

A

As there are slower RT’s in incongruent trials when the target letter is local letters, but neutral RT’s in both incongruent and congruent trials when target letter is global

The implication is that we have a faster broader attentional breadth, and our local incongruent focus is processed after global processing

This is also congruent with other evidence on visual processing with m and p cells, where studies have also found that the broader/global outline of any stimuli seems to be processed first in the visual pathway before local features from p cells.

20
Q

What type of Navon task is specifically used to measure attentional breadth?

A

Measuring attentional breadth with Navon (divided attention task)

  1. Participants asked to identify whether a certain letter is present at either the global or local level
  2. Faster RT’s for global letters indicate broad attentional breadth
  3. Faster RT’s for local letters indicate a narrow attentional breadth
21
Q

How does the flankers task measure attentional breadth?

A

A task where a participant is asked to identify a target letter in the middle of a screen and ignore the surrounding ‘flankers’.

In congruent trials, the surrounding flankers are the same letter as the target letter, in incongruent trials the surrounding flankers are different.

22
Q

What does the flankers task predict about broad and narrow attentional breadth respectively?

A
  1. A person with broad attentional breadth is predicted to see and process the flankers, and if incongruent, it may result in slower RT’s for identifying the target letter.
  2. A person with narrower attentional breadth is more likely to be able to ignore the flankers regardless of whether the trials are incongruent or congruent.
23
Q

How is inhibition of return used to measure attentional breadth?

A

IOR only occurs when cue and target are within someone’s attentional breadth, so researchers measure how long they can separate the cue and target and still get IOR, as a measure of attentional breadth

24
Q

What does a steep slope between IOR and RT imply?

A

A steeper slope of IOR distribution indicates that reaction time gets faster as the distance between the cue and target increases, and they have a lower IOR as distance increases - indicating narrower attentional breadth

25
Q

What does a shallow slope between IOR and RT imply?

A

A shallower slope of IOR distribution indicates they maintain a similar reaction time as the cue becomes more distant from the target, - IOR stays the same, indicating broader attentional breadth.

26
Q

What is a summary of the Zoom-Lens model for attentional breadth?

A

The metaphor shows how the wider the attentional breadth is, the lower the resolution / perceptual precision and spatial acuity

D’ [prime] increases with wider attentional breadth

27
Q

What are 2 forms of evidence for the zoom-lens model?

A
  1. Similar zoom-lens effects seem to take place in the visual cortex
  2. RT’s are faster with higher accuracy in narrow attentional visual fields
28
Q

How can Lavie’s perceptual load theory be tested with flanker paradigm?

A
  1. High load condition = have the flankers be different letters/colours (more incongruent trials)
  2. Low load condition = have the flankers be the same letter (more congruent trials)
29
Q

How to design a study about if emotions broaden attentional breadth?

A

IV: positive and neutral condition mood
DV: attentional breadth measured through flanker effect

Results: according to the hypothesis, broader flanker interference would be expected to be observed in participants exposed to the happy mood condition than the neutral condition