Water Flashcards
Nile
-shared by 10 countries
-most water used by Egypt, Sudan,
and Ethiopia
-Egypt gets more than 97% of
water from Nile and last in line
-must import 40% of grain to feed
growing population
-Ethiopia and Sudan plan to divert
more water from the Nile ->
decreased water availability in
Egypt
- Egypt’s options:
> go to war w/ Sudan & Ethiopia
> cut population growth
> increase irrigation efficiency
> work out water sharing agreements
Tigris-Euphrates
-shared by turkey, Syria, and Iraq
- turkey:
> at headwaters -> controls flow
downstream
> building 24 dams to generate
electricity for irrigation
> will reduce flow by 35% or more
- Syria plans to build dams -> less
water for Iraq -> may lead to war
between Syria and Iraq
Jordan
- most water - short region
- share by Jordan, Syria, and Israel
- population in area expected to
double by 2050 - 1994: Israel and turkey signed a
treaty which turkey will supply
Israel with water in exchange for
weapons - Syria plans to build dams -> Israel
threatened to destroy dams
Waters Importance
- oceans help regulate climate
- oceans dilute and degrade wastes
- oceans provide habits for many
species - organisms are made up mostly of
water - water used in:
> agriculture
> manufacturing
> transportation
Surface water
- surface runoff - rivers, lakes, reservoirs - watershed (drainage) basin - reliable runoff - 1/3 of total (2/3 lost by seasonal floods)
Groundwater
- zone of saturation
- water table
- aquifers - porous, water -
saturated layer of groundwater
that can be economically used - natural recharge - replenished
from the side by nearby streams
Aquifers
- if rate of withdrawal > rate of
renewal…
> salt-water intrusion may occur
in coastal areas
> depletion of aquifer may result
in decreased flow of rivers and
streams fed by aquifer - fossil aquifer
> gets very little recharge on a
human scale
> considered a non-renewable
resource
> “water mining” - withdrawal of
large amounts is water from
ancient water deposits
Case study: freshwater resource in the USA
- Western USA - water poor > too little precipitation > groundwater > large use: irrigation (85%) > water problems -> shortage of runoff -> prolonged drought -> decreased water table (sinkholes) - Eastern USA - water rich - ample precipitation - surface water - largest use: -> energy productivity -> cooling -> manufacturing - water problems -> flooding -> occasional shortage -> pollution ( ex. 3 million Long Island NY residents rely on and increasingly contaminated aquifer)
World Statistics
- 2002 UN report: > 500 million people live in water stressed/ water scarce areas -> projected to increase to 2.4 - 3.4 billion people by 2025 - china: water supply can only support 50% of it's current population - water shortages will cause: > decreased food production > decreased economic growth and development - 1 out of 6 people - no regular access to clean water and live in hydrological poverty > cannot afford safe, clean water > do not have municipal water supply and most use unsafe water or buy water
Human activities worsen flooding
- urbanization > paving and building -> increase runoff - draining wetlands (that absorb floodwaters) - removal of water - absorbing vegetation on hill slopes - increased population living on floodplains
Channelization: reducing flooding risks
- the straightening, widening, and deepening of a stream > advantages: -> decreased upstream flooding > disadvantages: -> can increase bank erosion (due to increased velocity) -> can increase downstream flooding -> can increase sedimentation downstream -> \$\$$
Levees
- increase streams capacity to hold water > advantages: -> decreased flooding > disadvantages: -> false sense if security -> people build too close -> if water breeches levee -> cannot recede -> areas stay underwater longer
Identify and manage flood-prone areas
- zoning laws: > examine historical records and create flood frequency/flood hazard maps > ban buildings in high risk zones > elevated buildings > construct a flood way that allows water to flow through a community with minimal damage
Stream Pollution
- natural recovery processes > can recover rapidly from degradable, oxygen- demanding wastes or excess heat by a combination of dilution and bacterial decay
Resolving water distribution problems requires:
- regional cooperation
- decreased population growth
- increased efficiency in water use
- higher water prices
- increased grain imports
- improvements in irrigation
Water’s Unique Properties
- liquid water exists over a wide temperature range - water filters out UV -> protects aquatic organisms - water's high specific heat -> change temperature slowly > helps protect organisms from abrupt temperature changes > moderates climate > excellent coolant - superior solvent - can dissolve many compounds > carry dissolved nutrients into tissues in organisms > flush wastes out if tissues > all-purpose cleanser > note: this property of water causes it to become easily polluted - E-X-P-A-N-D-S as it freezes -> ice floats and life can continue in ponds and lakes during cold winter months
Flowing Artesian Wells
- ordinary well: > needs energy to extract > unconfined aquifer - more likely to be polluted - wells A & B > flowing artesian wells: flow under their own natural pressure > confined aquifer - less likely to be polluted because of small recharge area
World Average Water Use
70% - water withdrawn is used for agricultural reasons (typically irrigation) 20% - water withdrawn is for industrial use 10% - water withdrawn is used for residential use
Case Study: Freshwater Resources in USA
- USA has enough water for
everyone, but much is in the
wrong place at the wrong time
Water Hot Spots in Western States
- water hot spots in 17 USA western states that, by 2050, could ave intense conflicts over scarce water needed for urban growth, recreation, and wild life
Freshwater Shortages
- dry climate/aridity
- drought
> a period of 21 days (or longer) in
which precipitation is at least
70% lower than normal - desiccation
> drying of exposed soil due to
deforestation, overgrazing - water stress
> low per capita availability (due
to increased population relying
on fixed supply)
Hydrological Poverty
- developed countries have the ability to bring water into needed areas - developing countries, the people are forced to live where the water is > water quality may decline from animals > improper disposal of waste > water for bathing may also be water for drinking
Solutions: Increasing Freshwater Supplies
- dams
- watershed transfer
- tapping groundwater
- desalination
- water conservation/curbing waste
Trade-offs of Large Dams and Reserviors
- provides irrigation water above and below
dam - provides water for drinking
- reservoir useful for recreation and fishing
- can produce cheap electricity (hydro-
power) - reduces downstream flooding
- flooded land destroys forests or cropland
and displaces people - $$$ to build
- large losses of water through evaporation
- deprives downstream cropland and
estuaries of nutrient rich soil - risk of failure and devastating downstream
flooding - disrupts migration and spawning of some fish
Case Study: China’s Three Gorges Dam
- “Great Wall across the Yangtze”
- will be the world’s largest hydroelectric
dam and reservoir
> dam - 1.2 miles long
> reservoir - 370 miles long - will be completed in 2013
- cost $25 billion
- will displace 1.9 million people
- will generate the electrical equivalent of 20
coal pr nuclear power plants - will decrease downstream flooding (which
has killed 500,000 people during past 100
years)
TRADE OFFS
China’s Three Gorges Dam
-advantages > will generate about 10% of china's electricity > reduces dependence on coal > reduces air pollution > reduces CO2 emissions > reduces chances of downstream flooding for 16 million people > reduces river sitting below dam by eroded soil > increases irrigation water for cropland below dam - disadvantages > floods large areas of cropland and forests > displaces 1.9 million people > increases water pollution because of reduced water flow > reduces deposits of nutrient-rich sediments below dam > increases saltwater introduced into drinking water near mouth of river because of decreased water flow > disrupts spawning and migration of some fish below dam > high cost
Case Study: Aral Sea Disaster
- large-scale water transfers in dry central
Asia (Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan - former
Soviet Union) - since 1960, water was diverted from Aral
sea and 2 feeder rivers for irrigation canal -
8– miles long - world’s longest irrigation canal - 800 miles
- salinity - increase 3x
-surface area - decreased 54% - volume - decreased by 15%
- 14.000 square miles of human-made salt
desert - flash extinctions and loss of fishing
industry
> 60,000 people unemployed - wetland destruction and wildlife - loss of
50% of all bird and animal species - “salt rain”
> wind blown salt -> kills crops
> salt settling on glaciers in the
Himalayas -> accelerating melting - climate changes
> decreased moderating effect of sea ->
hotter summers, colder winters
> less rain
> shorter growing season - increased use of pesticides and fertilizers
by farmers -> groundwater contamination
-> increased infant mortality and cancers - 20-50% decreased crop yeild
TRADE OFFS
Withdrawing groundwater
- advantages > useful for drinking and irrigation > available year-round > exists almost everywhere > renewable if not over-pumped or contaminated > no evaporation losses > cheaper to extract than most surface waters - disadvantages > aquifer depletion from over-pumping > sinking of land (subsidence) for over-pumping > aquifers polluted for decades or centuries > saltwater intrusion into drinking water supplies near coastal areas > reduced water flows into surface waters > increased cost and contamination from deeper wells
Case Study: Ogallala Aquifer
- world’s largest known aquifer
- mid-western U.S. - 8 states (South
Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Colorado,
Wyoming Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas) - fossil aquifer - filled during last ice age
- being pumped 8-10x faster than natural
recharge rate - transformed prairie land (with little rain) ->
productive farmland that produces 20% of
agricultural output ($32 billion/year) - depletion is encouraged by government
subsidies to farmers to grow “thirsty”
crops, and not to improve efficiency of
irrigation
NOTE: of all the water from the Ogallala aquifer was on the surface, it would cover all 50 stats with 1.5 feet of water
Case Study: James Bay Watershed Transfer
- involved creating 600 dams to alter, and
even reverse, the flow of 19 giant rivers - would flood areas utilized by Cree and
Inuit tribes - phase 2 was postponed due to opposition
and the fact that phase 1 created more
electricity than could be sold
Benefits of Reducing Water Waste
- reducing waste to 15% will allow us to meet most of the world's water demands for the foreseeable future - decrease burden on waste water plants - decreased need for dams and water transfer projects (will disrupt fewer habitats and displace less people) - slow groundwater depletion - save $ - save energy
Reducing Irrigation Water Waste
Solutions
- line canals bringing water to irrigation
ditches - irrigate at night to reduce evaporation
- monitor soil moisture to add water only
when necessary - grow several crops on each plot of land
(poly-culture) - encourage organic farming
- avoid growing water-thirsty crops in dry
places - irrigate with treated urban waste water
- import water-intensive crops and meat
Reducing Water Waste
Solutions
- redesign manufacturing processes to use less water - recycle water in industry - landscape yards with plants that require little water - use drip irrigation - fix water leaks - use water meters - raise water prices - use water-less composting toilets - require water conservation in water-short cities - use water-saving toilets, shower-heads, and front-loading clothes washers - collect and reuse household water to irrigate lawns and non-edible plants - purify and reuse water for houses, apartments, and office buildings
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
Water Use and Waste
- use water-saving toilets and faucet
aerators - shower instead of taking baths, and take
short showers - repair water leaks
- turn off sink faucets while brushing teeth,
shaving, or washing - wash only full loads of clothes or use the
lowest possible water- level setting for
smaller loads - use recycled (gray) water for watering
lawns and household plants and for
washing cars - wash a car from a bucket of soapy water,
and use the hose for rinsing only - if you use a commercial car wash, try to
find one that recycles water - replace your lawn with native plants that
need little if any watering - water lawns and yards in the early
morning or evening - use drip irrigation and mulch for gardens
and flowerbeds
Benefits of Flooplains
- fertile soil -> productive farmland
- nearby rivers for transportation and
recreation - flatland’s for urbanization and farming
- recharge groundwater
- ample water for irrigation
- highly productive wetlands
Dangers of Floodplains and Floods
- deadly and destructive
- failing dams and water diversion
- Hurricane Katrina and the Gulf Coast
> removal of coastal wetlands - in MDCs, people deliberately settle on
floodplains and then expect dams, and
levees to protect them
NOTE: in U.S. 10 million homes and businesses (valued at $1 trillion) are located on floodplains
Case Study: Floodplains of Bangladesh
- dense population
> one of the world’s poorest and most
densely populated countries (147 million
people in area the size of Wisconsin) - located on coastal floodplain
- moderate annual floods maintain fertile
soil - “great” floods used to occur every 50
years - increase frequency of large floods since
the 1970s - changes in the Himalayan watershed ->
increased flooding:
> population growth
> deforestation (uphill)
> overgrazing
> unstable farming on hilly slopes
> destruction of coastal wetlands
-> Bangladesh’s poor have cleared
mangrove forests (for fuel wood) ->
increased flooding because swamps
absorb water
-1998 flood:
> covered 2/3 of Bangladesh’s land area
for 9 months
> leveled 2 million homes
> drowned approximately 2,000 people
> left 30 million people homeless
> destroyed 25% crops -> led to
thousands of deaths by starvation - 2002 flood:
> left 5 million homeless - dangers from cyclones and storm surges
> since 1971, 17 cyclones have hit area
> 1970 storm: 1 million people drowned
> 1991 storm surge: killed 139, 000 people
Reducing Flood Damage
Solutions
- prevention > preserve forests on watershed > preserve and restore wetlands in floodplains > tax development on floodplains > use floodplains primarily for recharge aquifers, sustainable agriculture and forestry - control > strengthen and deepen streams (channelization) > build levees or flood walls along streams > build dams
1973: U.S. Federal Flood Disaster Protection Act
- requires all local governments to adopt
floodplain development regulations in order
to be eligible for federal flood insurance - denies federal funding to proposed
construction projects in designated flood
hazard areas - federal flood insurance program
underwrites $185 billion in policies
because private insurance companies are
not willing to insure people who live in
flood plains
NOTE: many environmentalists feel that it would make more sense for the government to buy back the land that floods regularly rather than making disaster payments
OR: should we adopt a “LIVE AT YOUR OWN RISK” policy with no federal flood insurance
Solutions: Increasing Freshwater Supplies
- dams
- watershed transfer
- tapping groundwater
- desalination
- water conservation/curbing waste
Trade-offs of Large Dams and Reserviors
- provides irrigation water above and below
dam - provides water for drinking
- reservoir useful for recreation and fishing
- can produce cheap electricity (hydro-
power) - reduces downstream flooding
- flooded land destroys forests or cropland
and displaces people - $$$ to build
- large losses of water through evaporation
- deprives downstream cropland and
estuaries of nutrient rich soil - risk of failure and devastating downstream
flooding - disrupts migration and spawning of some fish
Case Study: China’s Three Gorges Dam
- “Great Wall across the Yangtze”
- will be the world’s largest hydroelectric
dam and reservoir
> dam - 1.2 miles long
> reservoir - 370 miles long - will be completed in 2013
- cost $25 billion
- will displace 1.9 million people
- will generate the electrical equivalent of 20
coal pr nuclear power plants - will decrease downstream flooding (which
has killed 500,000 people during past 100
years)
TRADE OFFS
China’s Three Gorges Dam
-advantages > will generate about 10% of china's electricity > reduces dependence on coal > reduces air pollution > reduces CO2 emissions > reduces chances of downstream flooding for 16 million people > reduces river sitting below dam by eroded soil > increases irrigation water for cropland below dam - disadvantages > floods large areas of cropland and forests > displaces 1.9 million people > increases water pollution because of reduced water flow > reduces deposits of nutrient-rich sediments below dam > increases saltwater introduced into drinking water near mouth of river because of decreased water flow > disrupts spawning and migration of some fish below dam > high cost
Case Study: Aral Sea Disaster
- large-scale water transfers in dry central
Asia (Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan - former
Soviet Union) - since 1960, water was diverted from Aral
sea and 2 feeder rivers for irrigation canal -
8– miles long - world’s longest irrigation canal - 800 miles
- salinity - increase 3x
-surface area - decreased 54% - volume - decreased by 15%
- 14.000 square miles of human-made salt
desert - flash extinctions and loss of fishing
industry
> 60,000 people unemployed - wetland destruction and wildlife - loss of
50% of all bird and animal species - “salt rain”
> wind blown salt -> kills crops
> salt settling on glaciers in the
Himalayas -> accelerating melting - climate changes
> decreased moderating effect of sea ->
hotter summers, colder winters
> less rain
> shorter growing season - increased use of pesticides and fertilizers
by farmers -> groundwater contamination
-> increased infant mortality and cancers - 20-50% decreased crop yeild
TRADE OFFS
Withdrawing groundwater
- advantages > useful for drinking and irrigation > available year-round > exists almost everywhere > renewable if not over-pumped or contaminated > no evaporation losses > cheaper to extract than most surface waters - disadvantages > aquifer depletion from over-pumping > sinking of land (subsidence) for over-pumping > aquifers polluted for decades or centuries > saltwater intrusion into drinking water supplies near coastal areas > reduced water flows into surface waters > increased cost and contamination from deeper wells
Case Study: Ogallala Aquifer
- world’s largest known aquifer
- mid-western U.S. - 8 states (South
Dakota, Nebraska, Kansas, Colorado,
Wyoming Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas) - fossil aquifer - filled during last ice age
- being pumped 8-10x faster than natural
recharge rate - transformed prairie land (with little rain) ->
productive farmland that produces 20% of
agricultural output ($32 billion/year) - depletion is encouraged by government
subsidies to farmers to grow “thirsty”
crops, and not to improve efficiency of
irrigation
NOTE: of all the water from the Ogallala aquifer was on the surface, it would cover all 50 stats with 1.5 feet of water
Case Study: James Bay Watershed Transfer
- involved creating 600 dams to alter, and
even reverse, the flow of 19 giant rivers - would flood areas utilized by Cree and
Inuit tribes - phase 2 was postponed due to opposition
and the fact that phase 1 created more
electricity than could be sold
Benefits of Reducing Water Waste
- reducing waste to 15% will allow us to meet most of the world's water demands for the foreseeable future - decrease burden on waste water plants - decreased need for dams and water transfer projects (will disrupt fewer habitats and displace less people) - slow groundwater depletion - save $ - save energy
Reducing Irrigation Water Waste
Solutions
- line canals bringing water to irrigation
ditches - irrigate at night to reduce evaporation
- monitor soil moisture to add water only
when necessary - grow several crops on each plot of land
(poly-culture) - encourage organic farming
- avoid growing water-thirsty crops in dry
places - irrigate with treated urban waste water
- import water-intensive crops and meat
Reducing Water Waste
Solutions
- redesign manufacturing processes to use less water - recycle water in industry - landscape yards with plants that require little water - use drip irrigation - fix water leaks - use water meters - raise water prices - use water-less composting toilets - require water conservation in water-short cities - use water-saving toilets, shower-heads, and front-loading clothes washers - collect and reuse household water to irrigate lawns and non-edible plants - purify and reuse water for houses, apartments, and office buildings
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
Water Use and Waste
- use water-saving toilets and faucet
aerators - shower instead of taking baths, and take
short showers - repair water leaks
- turn off sink faucets while brushing teeth,
shaving, or washing - wash only full loads of clothes or use the
lowest possible water- level setting for
smaller loads - use recycled (gray) water for watering
lawns and household plants and for
washing cars - wash a car from a bucket of soapy water,
and use the hose for rinsing only - if you use a commercial car wash, try to
find one that recycles water - replace your lawn with native plants that
need little if any watering - water lawns and yards in the early
morning or evening - use drip irrigation and mulch for gardens
and flowerbeds
Benefits of Flooplains
- fertile soil -> productive farmland
- nearby rivers for transportation and
recreation - flatland’s for urbanization and farming
- recharge groundwater
- ample water for irrigation
- highly productive wetlands
Dangers of Floodplains and Floods
- deadly and destructive
- failing dams and water diversion
- Hurricane Katrina and the Gulf Coast
> removal of coastal wetlands - in MDCs, people deliberately settle on
floodplains and then expect dams, and
levees to protect them
NOTE: in U.S. 10 million homes and businesses (valued at $1 trillion) are located on floodplains
Case Study: Floodplains of Bangladesh
- dense population
> one of the world’s poorest and most
densely populated countries (147 million
people in area the size of Wisconsin) - located on coastal floodplain
- moderate annual floods maintain fertile
soil - “great” floods used to occur every 50
years - increase frequency of large floods since
the 1970s - changes in the Himalayan watershed ->
increased flooding:
> population growth
> deforestation (uphill)
> overgrazing
> unstable farming on hilly slopes
> destruction of coastal wetlands
-> Bangladesh’s poor have cleared
mangrove forests (for fuel wood) ->
increased flooding because swamps
absorb water
-1998 flood:
> covered 2/3 of Bangladesh’s land area
for 9 months
> leveled 2 million homes
> drowned approximately 2,000 people
> left 30 million people homeless
> destroyed 25% crops -> led to
thousands of deaths by starvation - 2002 flood:
> left 5 million homeless - dangers from cyclones and storm surges
> since 1971, 17 cyclones have hit area
> 1970 storm: 1 million people drowned
> 1991 storm surge: killed 139, 000 people
Reducing Flood Damage
Solutions
- prevention > preserve forests on watershed > preserve and restore wetlands in floodplains > tax development on floodplains > use floodplains primarily for recharge aquifers, sustainable agriculture and forestry - control > strengthen and deepen streams (channelization) > build levees or flood walls along streams > build dams
1973: U.S. Federal Flood Disaster Protection Act
- requires all local governments to adopt
floodplain development regulations in order
to be eligible for federal flood insurance - denies federal funding to proposed
construction projects in designated flood
hazard areas - federal flood insurance program
underwrites $185 billion in policies
because private insurance companies are
not willing to insure people who live in
flood plains
NOTE: many environmentalists feel that it would make more sense for the government to buy back the land that floods regularly rather than making disaster payments
OR: should we adopt a “LIVE AT YOUR OWN RISK” policy with no federal flood insurance
Stream Pollution
- oxygen sag curve > curve in the oxygen concentration line when degradable wastes or heat are introduced into a stream/river > O2 levels decrease at the point of discharge -> reach their lowest point in the sceptic zone -> and then begin to increase in the recovery zone > the depth and width of the curve (and therefore the time and distance needed for the stream to recover) depend on: -> stream volume -> stream flow rate -> stream temperature -> pH -> volume of incoming degradable wastes
Pollution Prevention in Streams
- require cities to withdraw their water downstream (rather than upstream) -> force cities to clean up their own waste - good news > water pollution control laws (1970s) -> increased the number and improved the quality if waste water treatment plants -> required industries to decrease/eliminate point source discharge into surface waters --> ex. Ohio's cuyahoga river - caught fire in 1969 - bad news > increased pollution in LDCs > USA has too few monitoring stations (64% unknown)
Lake Pollution
- dilution less effective than with streams > stratification -> little mixing and less dilution > low flow -> flushing and changing water in lakes takes a long time (1- 100 years) compared to streams - lakes are more vulnerable than streams - eutrophication - natural aging process > oligotrophic ( Best recovery -> least recovery ) ( River -> lake -> groundwater )
Lake Pollution - Cultural Eutrophication
- causes > over nourishment of lakes with plant nutrients as a result of human activities (agriculture, urbanization, sewage plants, etc.) - prevention > advanced waste treatment > ban/limit phosphates (detergents, cleansers) > soil conservation - prevents nutrient-rich soil from entering lakes - cleanup > dredge bottom of lakes (remove nutrient buildup) > pump oxygen into lakes (to increase DO) > remove weeds and undesirable plant growth
Stream Pollution
- oxygen sag curve > curve in the oxygen concentration line when degradable wastes or heat are introduced into a stream/river > O2 levels decrease at the point of discharge -> reach their lowest point in the sceptic zone -> and then begin to increase in the recovery zone > the depth and width of the curve (and therefore the time and distance needed for the stream to recover) depend on: -> stream volume -> stream flow rate -> stream temperature -> pH -> volume of incoming degradable wastes
Pollution Prevention in Streams
- require cities to withdraw their water downstream (rather than upstream) -> force cities to clean up their own waste - good news > water pollution control laws (1970s) -> increased the number and improved the quality if waste water treatment plants -> required industries to decrease/eliminate point source discharge into surface waters --> ex. Ohio's cuyahoga river - caught fire in 1969 - bad news > increased pollution in LDCs > USA has too few monitoring stations (64% unknown)
Lake Pollution
- dilution less effective than with streams > stratification -> little mixing and less dilution > low flow -> flushing and changing water in lakes takes a long time (1- 100 years) compared to streams - lakes are more vulnerable than streams - eutrophication - natural aging process > oligotrophic ( Best recovery -> least recovery ) ( River -> lake -> groundwater )
Lake Pollution - Cultural Eutrophication
- causes > over nourishment of lakes with plant nutrients as a result of human activities (agriculture, urbanization, sewage plants, etc.) - prevention > advanced waste treatment > ban/limit phosphates (detergents, cleansers) > soil conservation - prevents nutrient-rich soil from entering lakes - cleanup > dredge bottom of lakes (remove nutrient buildup) > pump oxygen into lakes (to increase DO) > remove weeds and undesirable plant growth
Groundwater Pollution
- most susceptible to pollution -> cannot cleanse itself > slow flow, dilution, dispersion > fewer bacteria > cooler temperatures (slow down decomposition rates)
Sources of Groundwater Pollution
- underground storage tanks > slow leak - 1 gallon/ day - can contaminate aquifer > chevron storage tank in California leaked 18x more oil than the Exxon Valdez - landfills - hazardous waste dumps - deep well injection - disposal of liquid hazardous waste - industrial waste storage lagoons
Oceans: the “Ultimate Sink”:
- have the ability to dilute, disperse and
degrade large quantities of waste - 2 views of ocean dumping:
> safer than incineration or land burial
> too little known about deep ocean,
would delay pollution prevention and
promote degradation
Ocean Pollution
- coastal areas - highly productive
ecosystems
> bear brunt of our inputs of pollution
> occupied by 40% of population
> twice that population by 2050
> about 80% marine pollution originates
on land
> 80-90% of municipal sewage from
coastal LDCs is dumped into oceans
without treatment
> according to one study in the U.S. 25%
of all people using coastal beaches
develop ear infections, sore throats, eye
irritation, respiratory disease, or
gastrointestinal disease after swimming
(due to vast colonies of viruses found in
U.S. coastal waters) - deep ocean waters
> some capacity to dilute, disperse,
degrade pollutants
What Pollutants are Dumped into the Ocean?
- dredge spoils > scraped from bottoms of harbors and rivers to maintain shipping channels > filled with toxic metals - sewage sludge >gooey mixture of toxic chemicals, infectious agents, and settled solids removed fro waste water at sewage treatment plants - 1992 - U.S. banned dumping sewage sludge into the ocean
Oil Pollution in Oceans
- crude and refined petroleum
- sources of oil pollution:
> tanker accidents (10% - but get much
publicity) (Exxon Valdez)
> urban runoff (45%)
> normal shipping practices (35%)
-> ballast and washing tankers
> atmosphere
> oil slick spreads from sunken rig
Effects of Oil Pollution on Ocean Ecosystems
- kill aquatic organisms
- volatile organic hydrocarbons
> kill larvae
> destroys natural insulation and
buoyancy - heavy oil
> sinks and kills bottom organisms
> coral reefs die
Effects Depend On
- type of oil > crude recovery quicker than refined - amount of oil released - distance from shore - time of year and weather conditions - water temperature > cold water is worse - ocean curents
Oil Cleanup Methods
- current methods recover no more than 15% - prevention is most effective method > control runoff > double hull tanker
Case Study: Exxon Valdez Oil Spill
- march 24, 1989
- tanker went off course, hit submerged
rocks at Alaska’s Prince William sound - oil slick coated 1,000 miles of shoreline
- killed
> 300,000-645,000 birds
> 5,500 sea otters
> 300 harbor seals etc. - response: “too little too late”
- lesson: don’t drink and drive an oil tanker
Preventing Non-point Source Pollution
- mostly agricultural waste
- decrease fertilizer runoff by:
> using slow-release fertilizer
> not using fertilizer on steep slopes
> planting buffer zones of vegetation
between fields and nearby waterways - decrease pesticide runoff by
> applying pesticides only when needed
> relying on biological pest controls - decrease runoff by
> planting buffers
> not locating feedlots on steep slopes
Discharge Trading Policy
- proposed by EPA in 1995
- in experimental stages
- allows for permit holders to buy and sell
pollution “credits” - opponents:
> no better than the ca set for total
pollution levels in any given area
> could allow pollutants to build up to
dangerous levels in areas where credits
are bought
Should CWA be Strengthened or Weakened?
- strengthening - environmentalists
> increase funding and authority:
-> to control non-point source pollution
-> for watershed planning
>improving programs to prevent and
control toxic discharges
>expanding ability of citizens to bring
lawsuits to ensure water pollution laws
are enforced - weakening - industry, farmers, state and
local officials
> too $$$
> too restrictive
> unnecessary to test for all water pollution
Sewage Treatment Systems
- rural and suburban areas - septic tank (25% of all US homes have septic tanks) - urban areas - waste water treatment plants > primary treatment - physical process > secondary treatment - biological process > chlorination - bleaching and disinfection
Treating Waste Water in Urban Areas
- water -> sewer pipes -> sewage treatment center - best scenario: separate lines for sewage and for runoff (\$\$$) - to save $, many cities have combined systems - problem: heavy rains can cause sewer systems to overflow -> discharge untreated sewage into surface waters
Sewage Treatment Plants
- 3 levels of purification:
- primary sewage treatment
- secondary sewage treatment
- tertiary/advanced sewage treatment
Primary Sewage Treatment
- mechanical/physical process
- uses screens to filter out debris (large
particles - stick, rags) - suspended particles settle in settling tank
(sludge) - water is removed from top of settling
tank/lagoon and released - after primary treatment, water
> has no sand, grit
> has organic matter, dissolved salts,
bacteria, and other microorganisms
NOTE: as long as there is high DO,
bacteria will degrade organic matter
Secondary Sewage Treatent
- biological process
- aerobic bacteria remove up to 90% of
biodegradable, oxygen demanding wastes - most US cities gave secondary treatment
- two types:
> trickling filters - waste water is sprayed
over crushed stones that are covered
with bacteria (spraying aerates the
water and increases the DO)
> activated sludge process - sewage is
pumped into large tank and mixed for
several hours with bacteria rich sludge
and air bubbles to increase degradation
by microorganisms
What do they do with the sludge?
- incinerate
- dump into ocean
- put in landfill
- used as fertalizer
What Wastes Remain After Primary and Secondary Treatments?
- 3-5% oxygen demanding wastes
- 3% suspended material
- 50% nitrates
- 70% phosphates
- 30% toxic metal compounds
NOTE: 34 east coast cities screen out
large floating pesticides and discharge
Tertiary/Advance Sewage Treatment
- specialized chemical and physical
process that removes specific pollutant
that remain after primary and secondary
treatments - vary according to specific contaminant to
be removed - usually remove nitrogen and phosphorus
- very $$$ (cost 2x as much to build, 4x as
much to operate) - can be used by industry to remove
specific pollutants
Chlorination
- final step in all levels of sewage treatment
- water is bleached to disinfect and remove
coloration - problem: chlorine can react with organic
matter in water to form CHC (chlorinated
hydrocarbons) which are possible
carcinogens and may damage the
nervous, immune and endocrine systems - alternatives: disinfect with UV light or
Ozone ($$$)
Drinking Water Quality - MDCs
- purification of urban drinking water
- water is stored in reservoir for several days
-> improves clarity and taste, allowing
suspended matter to settle - water is pumped to a purification plant and
treated to meet government drinking water
standards
Drinking Water Quality - MDCs
- poor quality drinking water -> diseases
- WHO: purify drinking water by exposing
clear plastic bottle filled with contaminated
water to intense sunlight
> heat and UV rays kill infectious
microbes in 3 hours
> paint one side of the bottle black can
improve heat absorption
> has reduced dangerous childhood
diarrhea by 30-40% - 2007 - danish company developed a $3
life-straw that purifies and filters
contaminated water
Ecological Waste-water Treatment
- working with nature to treat sewage
- living machines
- tanks with increasingly complex
organisms - artificially created wetlands