Walking away 🛰️ 🍃🍂 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Fill in the gaps and give analysis: ‘fire one’s __________ clay’

Hint: L, environment changes us from iressolute clay to…

A

‘fire one’s irresolute clay’

L= metaphor- highlights that painfu l events, are what fire people into clay, which will then shape their life. ; it also suggests they painful events in life can be permanent, leaving fixed marks on a person. [mental/physical]

  • Clay is a metaphorical representation of the body but also the self. Suggest that our environment that we mature in/grow up in, is what changes us from ‘irresolute clay’ to ‘clay’.
  • However the ‘clay’ may also be symbolic of how the son was socialised at home/school because it portrays humans as mouldable beings.
  • And because of the environment they are subject to throughout their child, this can change a person.
  • L= religious imagery- ‘fire one’s irresolute clay’- perhaps this is a Christian reference, as this is a notion that humans are made from earth and dust. For example, Isiah 64:8 teaches that ‘thou art our father; we are the clay and thou our potter’.
  • therefore this could reflect paternity,[and the father-and-son relationship in this poem.]- and by deliberately using this Christian reference, it suggests that life is a potter which shapes. This religious imagery, reinforces the idea that life and our environment, are what changes us from ‘irresolute clay’ to ‘clay’.
  • I= on the other hand, this religious imagery could reflect how the speaker’s son is being shaped into his own person [rather than living in his father’s shadow]
  • linking to the message of the poem: parents cannot protect their children from suffering; they should instead allow them to become independent.
  • ; the fire is ironic, since although it can be emotional painful/harmful, it’s metamorphic, as it morphs and shapes him into his form that he has chosen/decided

I= in contrast to this, the metaphor could also imply his shape has been predetermined by God- the potter- he was what shaped and morphed the son, not himself.

C= this is interesting to note contextually, because Day-Lewis’ father became a victor- so perhaps the speaker perceives/sees his parental relationship [with the son], as God’s will/plan- instead of mother nature’s will/plan.

I= ; this use of this alliterative metaphor- ‘small, scorching’ ordeal, could also reflect’s the speaker’s emotional pain because his son is departing from him. This is emphasised by the adjective ‘scorching’. [sibilance is also used]

I= Alternatively, the juxtaposition of ‘small’ and ‘scorching’ could also imply the speaker knows how he feels/his emotions, are larger than needed for the current situation- perhaps the speaker understand that this process is natural, although it may emotionally hurt him now- the speaker will eventually accept this/learn to live with this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

‘like a satellite, wrenched from its orbit’

Hint: ‘wrenched’ + ‘hesitant’

A

L= dramatic/powerful verb- suggests that the parting was emotionally hard for the speaker, as his son has been ‘wrenched’ from orbit, imitating how the speaker feels/thinks his son has been painfully wrenched from him.

  • But the juxtaposition of ‘wrenched’ and ‘drifting’ might suggest that the speaker has resistance in letting his son go; the the son is ready to gain his independence /freedom- highlighting how helpless the speaker feels at this point, as his only choice is to let his son go.

I= Alternatively, the verb ‘drifting’ could also suggest that the son didn’t want to quickly part.

I= On the contrary, it could perhaps also suggest the son shouldn’t be ‘drifting’ away from the speaker [because there could be consequences].

  • As when a satellite comes out of orbit, it crashes/collides to the ground- is this highlighting the speaker’s terror: his son will fall out of orbit, if he drifts away.

L= simile- the son is described as a satellite, that is orbiting the Earth; he has been savagely taken out of orbit, as the speaker’s son no longer resolves or ‘orbits’ around his father.

C= This is because, its a reference to the space race, as the poem ‘walking away’ was first brought out/published in 1962- in the peak of the space race.

  • Therefore, this [deliberate reference] reflects how this parting has disturbed/unsettled the speaker, similar to how the peak of the space race, had disturbed/unsettled the world.
  • this furthers the idea how the father believes, how he feels absent/a sense of lost, in the [parental/familial] relationship of his son: since the speaker is no longer focus of his son’s universe/world.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Fill in the gaps and give analysis: ‘pathos of a ____-_______ thing’ set free into the ‘___________’

Hint: L- the son is not ready to become independent

Hint #2: R,C

A

‘pathos of a half-fledged thing’

L= emotive metaphor- shows how the son is vulnerable and not ready to become independent + go.

R= A reader may feel pity for the son because he is only a young child.

C= the speaker’s guilt reflect how Day-Lewis had guilt at leaving a young child at boarding school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fill in the gaps and give analysis: ‘_____ at mind still.’

HInt: L- highlights emotional impact of parting, D, C- son’s mother R

Hint#2: animalistic connotations + uncontrollable sadness

A

‘Gnaws at mind still.’

L= verb- suggests how years later, the parting has had a psychological effect on the speaker. But ‘gnaws’ also had animalistic connotations- it shows the uncontrollable nature of the speaker’s sadness.

R= by placing the verb at the beginning of the line, it interests the reader because they want to know what is gnawing in his mind.

L= caesura highlights the emotional impact of the speaker’s son parting.

D= On a deeper level, it suggests the speaker still has guilt from leaving his family which reflects…

C= how Day-Lewis still feels guilt from leaving his son’s mother + the leaving a young child at boarding school (whose mother he has just divorced).

I= perhaps it could also reflect the guilt, from the speaker not noticing his son enough/giving him attention- the speaker finally understands he hasn’t been a nurturing/supportive father figure/parent- is this why their parental relationship had distance- the father caused it.

  • this idea/notion is reinforced by the father claiming he has had ‘worse partings’; the psychological effect of his son distancing himself and growing up seems to be superior than his worse partings- as they were inferior to the other partings that appeared to be dreadful/worse at the time.

C= on a contextual level, this worse partings could be reflective of his affairs he had committed. This is because Cecil Day-Lewis’ son Nicholas largely wrote about this [which was highly disturbing/distressing- to the extent, that Lewis’ other son: Daniel- attempted to take his own life, when he was sixteen years old.]

  • so overall, this could be used to reinforce the idea of what these worth partings in fact were.

I= this could once again reflect the guilt, the speaker is feeling as relating this to context, it could highlight how guilty he feels that he was the root of what caused Daniel and Nicholas to have space between each other/to have distance between each other.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fill in the gaps and give analysis: ‘Perhaps it is roughly Saying what ___ _____ _____ _________ ____-‘

Hint: ______ __ was inevitable

A

‘Saying what God alone could perfectly show-’

L= Biblical analogy- as God let his child go and he was hurt by the world but now the speaker let his son walk away from the father and into the ‘wilderness’.

  • poem ends with a religious reference by saying/claiming only ‘God alone’ could do this- this implies the speaker has reached the conclusion that was inevitable/unavoidable- he must let his child grow up in order to mature (and to do that, he must let him go).
  • ‘perhaps’ is speculative/tentative language- begins the notion, that the speaker isn’t certain whether he should let his son be independent and grow up

R= this leaves the reader in suspension, as they don’t know if the speaker emotional pain will still ‘gnaw’ at his mind, or gradually leave him.

  • L= adverb- ‘roughly’- this has connotations of harm and violence, perhaps reflecting how the speaker feels he was treated ‘roughly’ by the son- [he does this to remind him]

I= or it could perhaps reflect how roughly the speaker’s behaviour was, to the son in this poem- so perhaps could be the guilt that now ‘gnaws’ at his mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

This is another question about this quote. Fill in the gaps and give analysis: a half-fledged thing thing set free into a ‘__________’

Hint: L [uneasy about his feelings]
, dehumanising, C- emphasises relationship- why would Day-Lewis do this?

A

a half-fledged thing thing’ set free into a ‘wilderness’

  • By dehumanising the son and suggesting he is a simply a ‘thing’ that should be set into the wilderness, this further highlights the speaker’s unwillingness to let his son go.
  • L= noun- ‘wilderness’- suggests the speaker is uneasy about his feelings.

C= the speaker is emphasising/highlighting the parental relationship between them, which could reflect why Day-Lewis has decided to do this because…

Day-Lewis was brought up by his father because his mother died young, so this may explain why he is putting so much emphasis on this relationship.

  • the word ‘fledged’ has connotations of feathers, implying this half-fledged creature is similar to a bird; it lacks assurance and confidence to fly- metaphor suggests the son is ready to be ‘set free’, yet ‘half-fledged’ has connotations of peril, disaster and danger.
  • this is a connection to ‘like a satellite, wrenched from its orbit’- this once again highlights the speaker’s terror: he worries his son isn’t out of harm’s way- enjambement of ‘set free’ furthers this
  • ; this is also juxtaposed with into a ‘wilderness’- natural imagery has connotations of a hunter and a predator, therefore perhaps this suggests the son is vulnerable and will suffer from the things that are inside [the wilderness]- perhaps it could also suggest the future will be perilous Aswell.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

‘That hesitant figure, eddying away’

Hint: L, L

A
  • The son is doing badly

L= eddying- verb: suggests that the son is ready to gain independence because he is now also ‘hesitant’, and the use of this adjective highlights that the son has realised his vulnerability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the rhyme scheme of Walking away? Fill in the gaps: Walking away has a ____ rhyme scheme which reflects the speaker making an _____ decision to let his son __.

A

Walking away has a free rhyme scheme which reflects the speaker making an active decision to let his son go.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Quick question: What poems can we compare walking away to?

A
  • mother, any distance
  • Follower
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the rhyme scheme of walking away and what does it reflect?

A
  • walking away has a ABACA rhyme scheme, reflecting the stable nature of familial love (love for a father + child and vice-versa).
  • ; the poem is written in four quatrains [each stanza], that has three lines that are rhyming- this is untypical of poetry, as it would expected that the second and fourth lines rhyme.
  • the use of rhyme could represent an emotional bond between father + son but the 2nd and 4th lines might represent that children need to develop independence, without their parents.

I= But on the other hand, the deliberate and untypical use of the second and fourth lines remaining unrhymed, could perhaps reflect the speaker’s emotions:

  • the speaker feels his parental relationship isn’t fulfilled and complete, therefore the rhyme scheme is partial to reflect this- he argues and feels his son, is ‘walking away’ from him, therefore he must now let him ‘go’, so he can grow.

R= this would slightly disturb a reader, perhaps making them uncomfortable because the rhyme scheme is incomplete, reflecting the unsettling tone of the poem.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Quick question: What are the themes in Walking away?

A
  • parental love
  • family relationships
  • pain
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Fill in the gaps about the structure of Walking away: Walking away has _________ between the end of the first + the beginning of the ______ stanzas. What is the effect of doing this?

A

Walking away has enjambment between the end of the first + the beginning of the second stanzas- creates space between stanzas, like how the father creates space, from the son.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the emphasis of the caesura in the last stanza?

A

Emphasises how much the parting has pained the speaker.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fill in the gaps about the structure of walking away: Day-Lewis has chosen to rhyme some lines but leave others free of a rhyme scheme. What does this suggest about the relationship.

A
  • rhyme represents an emotional bond between father + son but the 2nd and 4th lines represent children needing to develop independence, without their parents.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the form of walking away ?

A
  • the form of walking away seems to be a [parental] love poem- this poem reflects the parental love that a father has, for his son- the speaker.

I/C= this is interesting to note on a contextual level, since although walking away can appear to be dedicated to his son ‘Sean’, as it describes the father leaving hi, alone on his first day at boarding school.

I/C= Alternatively, it could also suggest this poem is dedicated to his second son, ‘Nicholas’ [who rejected following his father’s path, and became an engineer, instead of a writer like his father].

  • So in view of this context, this poem could reflect Nicholas, deciding to ‘walk away’ and not become a writer. [like his father]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What else can you comment on, about the form of walking away ?

A
  • moreover in walking away, it’s interesting to note that each rhyme in the poem ends on a vowel sound. This creates a melancholy tone. [perhaps mirroring the melancholy mood of the poem]
17
Q

What structure point can you tell me about the opening of the poem ?

A
  • L= enjambement- ‘since I watched you play- gives the reader the impression that the father wasn’t particularly a part of/involved [in] his son’s adolescence.
  • This is because, it appears that the speaker didn’t watch his son play ‘football’ till this match.
  • furthermore, by deliberately examining the parental relationship he has with his own son, the speaker highlights the extent/depth of his [parental] love, that he has for his son- by arguing that he can still nearly remember the date of when this happened.
18
Q

Is there any else you can comment on, about the structure of walking away ?

A
  • typically, lines should have an identical syllable pattern [for example, in a sonnet].
  • ; walking away has an asymmetrical/irregular syllable pattern, creating a disturbing/unsettling tone and atmosphere, once again reflecting the speaker’s feelings: allowing his son to drift away from him.
18
Q

What can you tell me about the use of iambic pentameter in this poem ?

A
  • romantic/love poems tend to utilise and have iambic pentameter; not all lines in walking away have iambic pentameter.
  • This is interesting to note, as the iambic pentameter is used in some lines: ‘a sunny day with leaves just turning’, yet it’s also used in the line ‘and love is proved in the letting go- therefore this could suggest the speaker has finally rectified his problem, and is now able to accept that growing up is natural.
  • ultimately this highlights Cecil-Day Lewis’ message: children must grow independent of their parents, in order to thrive, as like seeds they cannot grow in the shadow of a tree, as it needs to fly.
19
Q

‘Behind a scatter of boys’

A
  • L= use of a collective noun- reflects the spark, liveliness and energy that the ‘scatter’ of boys possess.

I= ; it could perhaps once again, reflect how the speaker is feeling because ‘scatter’ has connotations of something that is sprinting, and running away.

  • this is a connection to the title of the poem: ‘walking away’, the son is walking away from his father, as he gains independence and is no longer a child.
  • moreover, the preposition ‘behind’ implies the speaker’s son has been led astray/away by this ‘scatter’ of boys.
  • perhaps this reflects and reinforces the idea that this poem, was dedicated to Nicholas [Cecil Day-Lewis’ son who became an engineer.].
  • as from some perspectives, the son would be percieved as typically masculine, due to his interest in engineering. [compared to the Lewis and his other son], therefore this could support the argument that this poem is dedicated to Nicholas, not Sean.
20
Q

‘Like a winged seed loosened from its parents stem’

A

The use of this simile also portrays this as natural, reflecting how the speaker is now able to see how his son leaving him, is natural [ a and part of life]

L= simile- the speaker compared his child to ‘a winged seed’, because like the seed is loosened and on its own, so is the son- he is now able to free, and to create new life.

This is because when a seed is dispersed, it produces life [in wind dispersal- the seed is blown away and carried by the wind as it eventually plants itself, producing new life of its own], therefore this simile is used to parallel between nature leaving its ‘parent’ [plant] and humans gaining independence, and leaving the shadow of their parents- reinforcing the idea that this is natural.

L= verb- ‘loosened’- perhaps this implies him being loosened from his father, is in his own interest- since he is no longer in the shadow of a parental relationship- and isn’t imprisoned/trapped in their relationship now.

21
Q

‘And love is proved in the letting go’

A
  • the son needs to walk away from his father, to develop a sense of himself as an individual; to prove that he really loves his son, the father must now let him ‘go’.
  • the speaker envisions his son as he lets go of him- seeking his freedom and independence- highlighting how he loves the speaker.
  • there is conflict between how is rejected and accepting this natural path/decision that must be taken- this reflects mother nature’s pattern- parents still showing affection to their children and loving them; also reflecting children leaving their parents