W8 - Performance Monitoring Flashcards

1
Q

What is performance monitoring

A

Identification and correct differences between an intended and executed response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Neuropsychological symptoms of performance monitoring deficits

A
  • The difference between knowing and doing
  • Perseverative behaviour
    • i.e. no learning
  • Lack of insight
    • i.e. denial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do many clinical group show neurologically in performance monitoring?

A

Hypoactive ERN/ACC after mistake

  • Cocaine users, SZ, AD, Alcohol, borderline personality disorder; medication-naïve adolescents with ADHD;
    • However, this could be due to a number of different explanations: task is too boring, doesn’t evoke enough emotion when a mistake is made etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the exception group which shows hyperactive ERN

A

OCD and OCD students

Heightened error-related ACC and ERN response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the ERN and what does it correlate with?

A
  • ERN in ACC (Medial Frontal Region) approx 50 to 100ms after making an error
  • ERN correlates with error awareness
    • Confident they made an error = Higher ERN
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the “Rabbitt effect” and who shows it

A

“Rabbitt Effect”

Cautious, or slowing, of response times immediately following an error

  • SZ Patients, or any group with hypoactive ACC/ERN
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the two-factor theory of delusion. What does it explain

A

Explains monoethetic delusions.

  • Factor 1
    • Depends on where brain has damaged cortex
  • Factor 2
    • Each share a common dysfunction in belief evaluation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the one-factor theory of delusion

A
  • Dynamic relationship between top-down and perception.
  • Impaired prediction error system to update beliefs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the 3 hypotheses on what ERN represents?

A
  • Emotional impact of an error #1
  • Response conflict #2
    • Two competing responses
  • Reward less than expected #3
    • Relative outcome
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The conflict monitoring theory of dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) function argues that it responds to the response conflict inherent to many executive function tasks, such conflict arises from what

A

Competition between two competing responses, which are typically congruent and incongruent to the task requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the evidence that ERN represent conflict monitoring (#2)

What is the caveat?

A

2 Evidence:

  • ACC activity during error correlates with slowing of response speed on the following trial
  • Greater ACC during an error thought to reflect response conflict in trials

Caveat

  • Separating the “response” from “accuracy feedback” results in greater ACC activity for the “feedback compared to “response”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the neurobiology behind ERN and the proposed role of ACC based on #2

A

#2

  • ERN in ACC
    • Decrease dopamine in Midbrain (Basil Ganglia)
  • Correct response
    • Increase dopamine in Midbrain (Basil Ganglia)

Proposed Role of ACC

Trasmit value of response to regions critical for behaviour

(.e.g DLPFC for inhibition; hippocampus for learning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the underlying principle underlying human behaviour and how does it relate to prediction errors?

A

Prediction error

  • Greater magnitude of prediction error
  • Greater dopamine cell activity
  • Likely behaviour will be ‘successful’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The reward prediction model of error:

How does ERN represent outcome relative to expectation (#3)

A

Reward prediction model of error #3

ACC activity or ERN reflects outcome relative to prediction

Evidence: Gambling Task

ERN influenced more by relative loss or gain, than whether a participants was correct or incorrect

  • Gain + Correct / Loss + Error was greater than
  • Gain + Error / Loss + Correct
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does ACC lesion relate to prediction error based on animal studies?

What does it suggest?

A

ACC Lesion in Monkeys

  • No impairment in performance immediately after an error
    • Intact learning from immediate feedback
  • Unable to sustain rewarded responses
    • Impaired ability to integrate feedback over time

Suggests ACC integrates value of outcome information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Do PD Patients learn better from Reward or Punishment (Experiment)

A

Patients off-medication (Low Dopemine)

  • Better learning from punishment than reward

Patients on-medication (High Dopemine):

  • Better learning from reward than punishment

[Note: Uncommon weird pattern in PD as usually low dopamine means greater sensitivity to seek reward]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Taq1A and learning patterns: Rewards vs punishment

A
  • Low D2 receptors (Taq1A) learn better from reward
  • But ‘Typical’ pattern (Normal D2) learn better from negative feedback/punishment
18
Q

How does ACC represent perceived and unperceived errors? Evidence from antisaccade task.

A

ERN represents both perceived and unperceived errors similarly (Unconscious detection)

19
Q

What is Error Awareness Task

A

Simiar to stroop task

Incongruent: Repeat words or correct colour words, leading to many unperceived errors

20
Q

What did the Error Awareness Task reveal?

A
  • ACC activity was necessary, but not sufficient, for awareness
    • ERN was similar, does not vary in whether participants were aware
    • ACC is important for awareness, but does not determine if we are aware
  • Insula and parietal activity predicted awareness.

(GSR reveals that they truly were unaware, not just forgetting to tell the experimenter)

21
Q

What brain areas in drug-abusers/others are associated with poor awareness (independent of task perforamance)

A

Cocaine, Cannibis, ADHD, SZ, Traumatic Brain Injury, AD

Reduced activity in both ACC and insula are associated with poor error awareness, independent of task performance

  • Hypoactive ERN
    • Poor insight into their own symptoms
  • Poorer inhibitory control performance
  • Poorer awareness of inhibitory failures
    • Only in repeated trial errors
    • Conscious error perception in congruent trials comparable to controls
22
Q

In cocaine-dependent users, what is the hypoactive ERN associated with and what did it predict?

A

Hypoactive ERN

  • Associated with reduced insight into effects of drug use
  • Predicted likelihood of relapse and extent of cocaine use following relapse
23
Q

What does insula do?

A
  • Involved in all subjective feelings
  • Awareness/ Interoception, of afferent representations of the feelings from the body
24
Q

Why do drug addicts not seek help

A

It is partly due to lower awareness = don’t realize need for help

25
Q

What happened to smokers when the insula is damaged. Why

A

Likely to quit.

Insula critical to awareness of cravings > lost cravings

26
Q

How does the insula and ACC work together

A
  • Insula
    • Limbic sensory
    • Site of awareness on basis of afferent representations
  • ACC
    • Motor cortices
    • Initiation of behaviour.
27
Q

Why does Methylphenidate influence the magnitude of the error-related negativity?

A

Methylphenidate influences prefrontal dopamine release

28
Q

Can we use drugs to enhance ERN (specifically ERN only). What is the underpinning physiological changes

A

Yes.

  • Single dose of MPH can improve error awareness without much change in response speed, accuracy, or inhibitory control
    • Underpinned by physiological changes in ACC (Or parietal in sustained attention)
29
Q

Neural mechanisms of learning

A

Strengthening of synapses.

Learning must be associative (emotions, motor planning)

30
Q

How to maintain durable and flexible encoding

A
  1. ) Meaningful encoding upon broader framework
  2. ) Retrieval Practice
31
Q

What is the relationship between sensitivty to reward and dopamine

A
  • Less D2 = Increased sensitivty to reward
  • Less D2 = Decreased senstiivty to punishment
32
Q

What is the monetary incentive GNG task

A

Adding a punishment factor into GNG task

33
Q

Results of monetary GNG task in drug-abusers vs control (Include Brain Parts)

A

Punishment manipulation

Significantly improved performance for both groups

However,

  • Controls more sensitive to punishment
    • Greater post-error slowing
    • Insula: r = 0.40; dACC: r = 0.37
  • CD shows dimished response to punishment
    • Less post-error slowing
    • Hypoactvity in dACC and insula
    • Insula: r = 0.04 ; dACC: r = -.05
34
Q

Why was paired-associative learning task developed?

A

Examine confound: Do gambllers perform badly because of failed learning or risk-taking?

35
Q

Paired-associative learning in cannabis users - Behavioural and neural results

A
  • Reduced ability to correct
  • Reduced ACC and hippocampus
    • ACC trasmit value to hippocampus to learn
36
Q

What is the outcome measure of paired-association learning task

A

Number of repeated errors

(Number repeats down the sequence. See whether they learn)

37
Q

What were the results of the associative learning task - Brain Parts implicated

A

Mistake Learning/Corrected

ACC and hippocampus (learning)

ACC trasmit value to hippocampus to learn

38
Q

What were the results of the associative learning task when punishment is involved - Neurological results

(What is the implication)

A
  • ACC not modulated by punishment/size of penalty
    • ACC detects how it should influence future behaviour
  • Insula modulated by punishment/size of penalty
    • Insula learn from adverse outcomes, and if no insula, we don’t learn from severity of outcome.
39
Q

What is ACC related to in learning outcomes

A

ACC activity reflects the extent to current outcome should dictate future actions. It is NOT modulated by punishment.

  • Rmb: leisioned ACC in monkeys showed only last outcome affected and they are unable to integrate feedback over time
40
Q

ACC and Insula: Summary

A

ACC

  • Detect error (conscious and unconscious)
    • Both perceived and unperceived errors.
  • Not modulated by severity of punishment.
  • Determines how current outcomes should predict future behaviour by transmitting information to other relevant regions

Insula

  • Afferent representations
  • Detect error (conscious)
    • Perceived erorrs
  • Modulated by severity of punishment

Both needed for learning