W8: Judgement and Reasoning Flashcards

The activity of thinking: how do people learn from experience and how do they make decisions? Cognitive shortcuts used to make judgements and more sophisticated reasoning. Errors in logical reasoning and factors that influence these errors. * Availability and representativeness * Covariation * Two types of thinking * Confirmation and disconfirmation * Decision making

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Heuristic

A

“Cognitive shortcuts” to make judgements. Efficient and often lead to sensible conclusions, but sometimes they can lead to error.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Covariation

A

Relates to cause and effect. Two variables are associated with one another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Illusions from covariation

A

People often detect covariation even where there is none, because of the evidence people consider when judging covariation: in making these judgments, people seem to consider only a subset of the facts, and it’s skewed by their prior expectations. Selection of evidence is likely to be guided by confirmation bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Type 1 thinking

A

Simple. fast. Uses heuristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Type 2 thinking

A

Slower, more sophisticated way of thinking. Likely to come into play only if the circumstances are right and only if the case being judged contains the appropriate triggers for this form of reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Confirmation bias

A

The tendency to be more alert to evidence that confirms your beliefs rather than to evidence that might challenge them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Judgement

A

The process through which people draw conclusions from the evidence they encounter, often evidence provided by life experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ignoring base-rate information

A

People rely only on the descriptive (diagnostic) information about the individual rather than base-rate information.

Example: lawyer or engineer?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Influence of chance on judgement

A

If the role of chance is big, people are more likely to realise that the “evidence” they’re considering may just be a fluke or an accident, not an indication of a reliable pattern. With this, people are more likely to pay attention to the quantity of evidence, on the sensible idea that a larger set of observations is less vulnerable to chance fluctuations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Influence of education on judgement

A

A person’s quality of thinking is influenced by education. How well people think about evidence can be improved, and the improvement applies to problems in new domains and new contexts. Training in statistics, it appears, can have widespread benefits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Inductive reasoning

A

Induction: the process in which you make forecasts about new cases, based on cases you’ve observed so far.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Deductive reasoning

A

Deduction: a process in which you start with claims or assertions that you count as “given” and ask what follows from these premises.

it helps keep your beliefs in touch with reality. Eg. Deduction leads you to a prediction based on your beliefs and the reduction turns out wrong - this indicates that something is off track in your beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Judgement

A

The process through which people draw conclusions from the evidence they encounter, often evidence provided by life experiences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Base-rate info

A

Info about how frequently something occurs in general

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Diagnostic information

A

Information about a particular case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Confirmation bias

A

The tendency to be more alert to evidence that confirms your beliefs rather than to evidence that might challenge them.

A greater sensitivity to confirming evidence and a tendency to neglect disconfirming evidence.

Can take many forms.

17
Q

Belief perseverence

A

Even when disconfirming evidence is undeniable, sometimes people don’t use it.

18
Q

Evidence for belief perseverence

A

Rpss & Anderson (1982) - suicide note task and feedback.

19
Q

Categorical Syllogisms

A

A type of logical argument that begins with two assertions (the problem’s premises), each containing a statement about a category, which can then be completed with a conclusion that may or may not follow from these premises.

Example:

  1. Leibniz worked with logic.
  2. I work with logic.
  3. I am Leibniz.
20
Q

Categorical Syllogisms

A

A type of logical argument that begins with two assertions (the problem’s premises), each containing a statement about a category, which can then be completed with a conclusion that may or may not follow from these premises.

21
Q

Invalid syllogism

A

When the conclusion does not follow from the premises stated in a categorical syllogism.

Example:

  1. Leibniz worked with logic.
  2. I work with logic.
  3. I am Leibniz.
22
Q

Task used to examine people’s reasoning about condition statements

A

Conditional statements: “If X, then Y”, with the first statement providing a condition under which the second statement is guaranteed to be true.

Studied with the selection task (sometimes called the four-card task).

23
Q

Belief Bias

A

If a syllogism’s conclusion happens to be something people believe to be true anyhow, they’re likely to judge the conclusion as following logically from the premises.

Conversely, if the conclusion happens to be something they believe to be false, they’re likely to reject the conclusion as invalid.

24
Q

Utility maximisation

A

Refers to the value you put on a particular outcome. No matter how much you gain utility, the proposal is that you try to make decisions that will bring you as much utility as possible.

25
Q

opt-in vs opt-out

A

Example: organ donors

Opt-in: assumption is that the person will not be an organ donor.
Opt-out: assumption is that the person is an organ donor.

The contrast between opt-in and opt-out decisions reminds us that our choices are governed bnot just by what is at stake but also by how the decision is framed.

26
Q

Reason-based choice

A

Our goal is simply to make decisions we feel good about, decisions we think are reasonable and justified.

27
Q

Affective forecasting

A

Your predictions for your own emotions - often inaccurate. People can usually predict whether their reaction will be positive or negative , but people consistently overestimate how long these feelings will last, apparently underestimating their ability to adjust to changes in fortune and also underestimating how easily they’ll find excuses and rationalizations for their own mistakes.

28
Q

Belief Bias

A

If a syllogism’s conclusion happens to be something people believe to be true anyhow, they’re likely to judge the conclusion as following logically from the premises.

Conversely, if the conclusion happens to be something they believe to be false, they’re likely to reject the conclusion as invalid.

29
Q

When does better-quality thinking seem more likely

A

When the data is described in terms of frequencies rather than probabilities, and also when the data are easily coded in statistical terms (with chance playing a prominent role in shaping the sample). Moreover, when people have background knowledge that helps them to code the data and understand the cause and effect role of sample bias or base rates. Training also makes Type 2 thinking more likely.