w6 Flashcards
expectations-augmented Phillips curve
The cyclical unemployment rate (the difference between actual and natural unemployment rates) depends only on unanticipated inflation (the difference between actual and expected inflation).
Anticipated increase in money supply
AD shifts up and SRAS shifts up, with no misperceptions.
Result: P rises, Y unchanged.
Inflation rises with no change in unemployment.
Unanticipated increase in money supply
AD expected to shift up to AD 2old (money supply expected to rise 10%), but unexpectedly money supply rises 15%, so A D shifts further up to A D 2 ,new
SRAS shifts up based on expected 10% rise in money supply
Result: P rises and Y rises as misperceptions occur
Why is output above the full-employment level in year 2?
- In year 2 the 15% rate of inflation is less than the 20% rate of money growth but greater than the 10% expected rate of inflation
- Because the price level grows by less than does the nominal money supply in year 2, the real money supply, M/P, increases, lowering the real interest rate and raising the aggregate quantity of goods demanded above Y.
- Because the price level grows by more than expected, the aggregate quantity of goods supplied also is greater than Y.
- So, higher inflation occurs with lower unemployment.
Long run: P rises further, Y declines to full-employment level.
when the public correctly predicts AD growth and inflation
unanticipated inflation is zero, actual unemployment equals the natural rate, and cyclical unemployment is zero
if AD growth unexpectedly speeds up
the economy faces a period of positive unanticipated inflation and negative cyclical unemployment
an unexpected slowdown in AD growth
the AD curve to rise more slowly than expected; for a time unanticipated inflation would be negative (actual inflation less than expected) and cyclical unemployment would be positive (actual unemployment greater than the natural rate).
The relationship between unanticipated inflation and cyclical unemployment implied
πβπ^π=ββ(π’βπ’Μ )
expectations-augmented Phillips curve
π
=π
^πβπ(πβπΜ
)
βactual inflation exceeds expected inflation if the actual unemployment rate is less than the natural rateβ
π=π^π β π’=π’Μ
ππ’Μ
π>π^π β π’
A supply shock in the classical model
A supply shock in the Keynesian model
- increases the natural rate of unemployment, because it increases the mismatch between firms and workers.
- reduces the marginal product of labor and thus reduces labor demand at the fixed real wage, so the natural unemployment rate rises.
So, an adverse supply shock shifts the short-run Phillips curve up and to the right.
The short-run Phillips curve will be unstable in periods with many supply shocks
Can the Phillips curve be exploited by policymakers?
Classical model: NO
- The unemployment rate returns to its natural level quickly, as peopleβs expectations adjust
So unemployment can change from its natural level only for a very brief time
Also, people catch on to policy games; they have rational expectations and try to anticipate policy changes, so there is no way to fool people systematically
Keynesian model: YES, temporarily
- The expected rate of inflation in the Phillips curve is the forecast of inflation at the time the oldest sticky prices were set
It takes time for prices and expected prices to adjust, so unemployment may differ from the natural rate for some time
The Lucas critique
When the rules of the game change, behavior changes!
Lucas applied this idea to macroeconomics, arguing that historical relationships between variables will not hold up if there has been a major policy change
The short-run Phillips curve is a good exampleβit fell apart as soon as policymakers tried to exploit it
Evaluating policy requires an understanding of how behavior will change under the new policy, so both economic theory and empirical analysis are necessary
The long-run Philips curve
- Long-run: π’=π’Μ for both Keynesians and Classicals
- The long-run Phillips curve is vertical, since when (π=π^π) π’=π’Μ
- Changes in the level of money supply have no long-run real effects; changes in the growth rate of money supply have no long-run real effects, either!
- Even though expansionary policy may reduce unemployment only temporarily, policymakers may want to do so for example, timing economic booms right before elections helps them (or their political allies) get re-elected.