W10 - SFA Channels, Applications & Monocular Cues Flashcards
How many cells underpin the contrast sensitivity function?
Is it due to having one cell type or multiple cells optimally tuned to different spatial frequencies? (single cell type vs. different population responses)
How would you set up an adaptation experiment to test this?
- Use electrodes in V1 to record different cells to look at different tuning
Behavioural studies: psychophysical electrode: use adaptation study
In conducting an adaptation study to determine the SF tuning of cells that
mediate the CSF, what does the participant view for an extended period of time
and what are they tested on?
Select a spatial frequency (eg 12 cycles per degree) and adapt to that stimulus - In adaptation CSF experiment, participants adapt to a pure sinewave
What pattern of results would indicate that the CSF is due to a single SF-tuned
channel?
all the different spatial frequencies will be reduced/less sensitive, and see a global overall reduction in sensitivity
What pattern of results would indicate that the CSF is due to multiple channels
tuned to different SFs?
Notch adaption =
the sensitivity of cells adapted to a specific spatial frequency will be reduced, while other cells that were not adapted to the spatial frequency will show no change in sensitivity, you only get a reduction in sensitivity around the cells that adapted to the stimulus with a specific frequency
Adoption study: 4. Which pattern of results do you get in those studies?
Get notch adaption (CSF is due to multiple channels
tuned to different SFs)
High SFs are processed by cells with small or large RFs?
High SFs are processed by cells with small receptive field sizes
Low SFs are processed by cells with small or large RFs?
Low SFs are processed by cells with large receptive field sizes
Is the image of Einstein defined by low or high SFs?
Einstein is going to have a lot of high spatial frequencies compared to Monroe
Is the image of Monroe defined by low or high SFs?
lower SFs compared to Einstein
In the Einstein-Monroe illusion - What happens to the SF of the image as viewing distance is increased?
/ Given the above, why do we perceive Einstein at short viewing distances,
and Monroe at long viewing distances?
- The spatial frequency content of the image gets higher with increasing viewing distance, and the more spatial frequencies are processed with smaller retinal image/visual angle and increasing distance
- By a certain distance, the high SFs content of Einstein becomes too fine to resolve under a human CSF, and thus the details of Monroe become more evident
Why does the illusion also work if you squint your eyes?
The process of squinting or looking from further away causes low pass filtering =
strips out the high spatial frequencies and the image is defined by low spatial frequencies
reduces your spatial acuity of the image, which thus reduces the sensitivity of high spatial frequencies to be processed.
You are more likely to make out the image of Monroe which is characterised by lower spatial frequencies
The painting of Mona Lisa has an ambiguous smile. We don’t see the smile when looking directly at it, only when looking away, i.e., in peripheral viewing.
(Explain this using SFA)
Since peripheral vision has less visual input to discriminate the finer details of the face, may lead to the fine details being average out with the shadows of the face, leading to blurring discrepancy of the face shadows and shape of the lips, less CSF components might appear to tell apart the shadows/lips = looking like she’s smiling
Answer = There are more HSF in fovea = looks like she is not smiling, and more LSF in periphery = looks like she is smiling
What is the idea of coarse-to-fine processing and how does is this consistent with the properties of magnocellular and parvocellular cells?
The visual system first processes low spatial frequency information and then fills in the details with high spatial frequencies
The axon conduction speed of p and m cells helps support the idea of course-to-fine processing in the visual system.
As Low SF processed by magnocellular system have a faster axon conduction speed than High SF processed by parvo cells, resulting in the visual system first interpreting an image by its course/outline content and then later processing the finer details by the p-cells.
What information is contained in a shadow boundary, compared to the
luminance boundary produced by a real object boundary?
How can the visual system can use the cell response to determine it is a shadow rather than a real object boundary?
The shadow border and real border both have low SF content
BUT
- the real border can be considered as a square wave of luminance, (characterised by both fundamentals and odd harmonics), so the real border has a COMBINATION of LOW and HIGH spatial frequencies to process the sharp edge (square wave) of the real border
- In the SHADOW border, all the cells tuned to LOW and INTERMEDIATE SFs but there are NO HIGH SF tuned to processing the edge
- Without HIGH SFs being tuned to the shadow, the visual system can determine that there is a discontinuity in luminance in the shadow border and processes it as a shadow instead of a real border / harsh contour.
What is the implication of using cell response to perceive shadows on harsh borders even when the object is gone?
Thus even though the object is no longer shown on the checkerboard, the brain still processes the luminance border as a shadow based on its spatial frequency content and its comparison of other spatial frequency content of the real borders of the checkerboard.