VTE Part 4 Flashcards
see slide 108
k
Low Dose ASA & Recurrent VTE
Unprovoked VTE, initial therapeutic anticoagulation completed 6-24 mos
• Randomized, double-blind trials of ASA 100 mg daily vs placebo
NEJM 2012;366:1959-67
Relative Risk Reduction of recurrent VTE vs placebo:
• 33% decrease with ASA
• ~80% decrease with DOAC
• ASA decreases risk of recurrent VTE by 1/3 vs placebo
What about ASA (CHEST 2016)?
“In patients with an unprovoked proximal DVT or PE who are stopping anticoagulant therapy and do not have a contraindication to aspirin, we suggest aspirin over no aspirin to prevent recurrent VTE (Grade 2C).
– Remark: Because aspirin is expected to be much less effective at preventing recurrent VTE than anticoagulants, we do not consider aspirin a reasonable alternative to anticoagulant therapy in patients who want extended therapy. However, if a patient has decided to stop anticoagulants, prevention of recurrent VTE is one of the benefits of aspirin that needs to be
balanced against aspirin’s risk of bleeding and inconvenience. Use of aspirin should also be reevaluated when patients stop anticoagulant therapy because aspirin may have been stopped with anticoagulants were started.
Mr. Smith is 60 years old and has been treated for 1
year with a DOAC following his unprovoked bilateral
segmental PE. You are seeing him in clinic today and
inform him:
- If he stops therapy, he is more likely to have a
recurrent DVT than a recurrent PE. - Given that he has been treated for a full year, he
should stop therapy as his likelihood of recurrent VTE
is low. - After a year of anticoagulant therapy he should
discontinue his anticoagulant and take ASA to
minimize bleeding yet have some protection against
recurrent VTE. - After taking either rivaroxaban 20mg daily OR
apixaban 5mg BID, he can step down to rivaroxaban
10mg daily OR apixban 2.5mg BID
would not give aspirin (only1/3 reduction compared to 80% with DOAC)
High Risk or Active Clot & Inability to Anticoagulate:
Inferior Vena Cava Filters
• Useful in patients with acute proximal DVT with a
contraindication to therapeutic anticoagulation due to high bleeding risk
• Reduce the risk of fatal PE in the short-term
• Increase the risk of DVT in the long term
• Presence of a permanent IVC filter may require long-term anticoagulation – foreign body in vasculature
• Retrievable Filters – removal rates poor (~20%)
– Remove within 3 months or may be permanent
only in ppt with active DVT
Post-Thrombotic Syndrome
• Occurs in nearly one-third of patients within
5 years after idiopathic DVT1
• PTS is characterized by: – Pain – Edema – Hyperpigmentation – Eczema – Varicose collateral veins – Venous ulceration • Severe PTS can lead to intractable, painful venous leg ulcers requiring on-going nursing and medical care
leg swelling, discolouration
Post-Thrombotic Syndrome vs.
DVT recurrence / extension
compare pain, swelling appearance
Pain ‘not as bad as when I had the clot’, ‘worse
after I’ve been on my feet’, ‘dull ache’
DVT: ‘just like the first time’,
‘worst it has ever been’
Swelling Usually will decrease after feet are
elevated (above level of the heart), gets
worse as leg is used / day evolves
DVT: Present at all times
Appearance Chronic changes
DVT: taut, Red, Warm
elevate them above heart
Post-Thrombotic Syndrome vs.
DVT recurrence / extension
leg symtpos
signs
Leg symptoms – Heaviness – Pain – Swelling – Itching – Cramps – Paresthesia – Burning pain • Aggravated by standing or walking
Signs – Edema – Telangiectasia – Varicose veins – Venous dilation – Hyperpigmentation – Eczema – Redness – Dependant cyanosis – Open/healed ulcers
Compression Stockings
• Designed to fit tight on affected leg, to assist in moving blood from the leg veins to circulation • Worn during waking hours • Avoid if: arterial insufficiency, intermittent claudication, uncontrolled heart failure, infection in area covered by stocking • Efficacy: Routine use found not to reduce PTS or have any important benefits* • Use: To reduce acute symptoms of DVT or chronic symptoms in those who have developed PTS • May start wearing within 1 month
Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary
Hypertension
(CTEPH)
- Serious complication of PE
- Up to 5% of patients with PE are reported to develop CTEPH1
- Thromboemboli may fail to resolve and organize into fibrotic deposits, permanently occluding pulmonary arteries → ↑flow patent vessels → augments shear stress → progressive pulmonary disease
- Initial phase of disease often asymptomatic and followed by progressive dyspnea and hypoxemia2
- Right heart failure can frequently occur
- Progressive condition associated with mortality rates of 4–20%2
need surgical tx
Venous Thromboembolism
Prevention is Key
Treatment –
Existing Clot
• DVT or PE
• PE can be lethal, DVT can
lead to PE
• Must treat with quick acting anticoagulant at full therapeutic dosing
• (Most effective strategy is to prevent VTE)
Prophylaxis –
At risk for Clot
• Risk stratification for patients at risk to develop clot (hospitalized)
• Orthopedic (hip/knee) replacement
• General Surgery
• Provide anticoagulant at prophylactic dose (=lower
than full therapeutic dose)
VTE Prophylaxis
when is it not indicated?
contra
see slide 119
• Very high risk with orthopedic (hip/knee) replacements
(40-80% will develop VTE)
• Medical / general surgery – 10-40% will develop VTE
• Consider for every hospitalized patient
not indicated if pt fully mobile, length of stay<72 hrs, minor surgery, <60 yrs old
contra: active bleeding, thrombocytopenia, severe HTN, bleeding disorder
drugs for VTE prophylaxis
slide 120
Which statement is correct?
- The signs and symptoms of PTS is very similar to
that of an acute DVT. - Post-thrombotic syndrome occurs more
commonly with larger DVTs that destroy venous
valves thereby promoting poor blood return. - Recurrent or large PEs in the pulmonary arteries
can lead to left ventricular dysfunction. - IVC filters should be inserted in patients with
evidence of PE that cannot be anticoagulated.
IVC filters should be inserted in patients with
evidence of PE that cannot be anticoagulated.?
COVID-19 & VTE
• General trend – saw higher VTE rates in hospitalized
patients earlier in the pandemic compared to later in the
pandemic
• Risk: ICU > non-ICU inpatient > ambulatory
– Hospitalized for COVID, prevalence of VTE 25% (95%CI 19-31%)
+/- thromboprophylaxis (double the rate reported in
hospitalized patients)
– ICU setting higher (17-31%) vs hospital ward (7-31%)
• Evidence evolving rapidly