Vrijj And Mann: Detecting Lies (Suspects) Flashcards

1
Q

PPs?

A

Volunteer same

  • EXP1: 1 convicted criminal
  • EXP2: 59 male, 6 female police officers West Sussex
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Method EXP1?

A

Coding study (prep)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Method EXP2?

A

Lab exp using independent measures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Procedure EXP1?

A

•suspect (later convicted of murder) videotapes during several hours of interview
-police had 2 eyewitness testimonies
-2 experienced officers present+his lawyer
-suspect denied involvement but later proved guilty
•6 fragments isolated+codes for 12 behaviours
(E.g gaze aversion, smiling, speech rate)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Results EXP1?

A
  • during pre-confession interviews: longer pauses, spoke slower, more speech disturbances than when telling truth
  • in confession interview, showed similar patterns of behaviour
  • appears when lying he had to think harder, telling truth he had to control behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Procedure EXP2?

A

•selected videotape fragments shown to 65 police officers who were asked after each:

  1. Is he lying? (Yes or no)
  2. Is he tense? (Likert scale 1-7)
  3. Is he controlling his behaviour? (1-7)
  4. Is he having to think hard? (1-7)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What were the 2 IVs in EXP2?

A
  • whether murderer lying or not in tape

* whether clips taken before or after confession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Results EXP2?

A
  • accuracy 64% (above level of chance+most deception studies)
  • better at detecting truth (70%) than lies (57%)
  • high individual differences (some based on stereotypes, some more perceptive)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conclusions?

A
  • murderer contradicted stereotypical lying behaviours e.g nervousness
  • murderer had been previously interviewed so possible d.c
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Strengths?

A
  • lab exp= high control, standardised, cause+effect
  • quantitative data
  • high Eco validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Weaknesses?

A
  • low Eco v as lab
  • ethnocentric
  • androcentrically biased
  • small sample
  • reductionist= irl have background info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aim?

A

To investigate the behaviour of a suspect telling lies during police interviews+to assess the accuracy of with which the police identify lies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly