The British Approach/ Deductive Profiling Flashcards
5 factor theory of sexual assaults?
- Interpersonal coherence= extent the victim will correspond to how the offender socially interacts/could represent a person in their life
- Significance of time+place= chosen by offender so could be important for where they live+their schedule
- Criminal characteristics= develop vague subsystems for classification of offender types
- Criminal career= whether criminal has committed before
- Forensic awareness= evidence that offender has knowledge of police techniques+procedures relating to evidence collection
How are victims grouped? (3)
- Victim as person= offender thinks they are developing some type of relationship e.g conversation
- Victim as object= offender concerned with control e.g blindfolding/gagging victim
- Victim as vehicle= violence (both physical+verbal) with demeans the victim, offender is angry
What are the assumptions?
- no offender acts without motivation
- should be investigated in own unique way as no 2 humans act alike
- some offenders have unique motivations/behaviours
- all human behaviour develops uniquely in response to environmental/bio factors
- single offender capable of multiple motives over commission of multiple offences/a single offence
Where is the data collected from to create a deductive profile?
- Forensic evidence
- Crime scene characteristics= determined from all forensic reports, analysis+documentation
- Victimology= victim grouping
Pros?
- higher accuracy= requires specialised training in forensic science
- higher reliability= examines behaviour of criminals as they change over time
- holistic
- less construct bias
- higher eco validity as incorporates many factors= complexity of real life
Cons?
- must have specialised profilers
- emotionally exhausting
- takes longer to specify criminal
- less reliable as subject to profiler bias
What does geographical profiling include?
Marauder= close to/ in home Commuter= travels from home
Canter+Heritage background?
Canters circle theory
•based on the assumption that criminals will commit crime in areas they know but don’t necessarily live in
•marauders= around their home
•commuters= away from home
Canter+Heritage aim?
To identify a behaviour pattern from similarities between offences
Canter+Heritage PPs?
Sexual offences committed by 27 offenders
•33 offence variables found
•could say ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to each^
•e.g variable 2= surprise attack
Canter+Heritage method?
Content analysis of 66 sexual offences from various police forces using small space analysis
Findings of Canter+Heritage?
Key variables: •surprise attack •vaginal intercourse •impersonal language •victims clothing disturbed •no reaction to victim
^occurred in 100% of rape cases, later developed into ‘5 factor theory’
Canter+Heritage conclusions?
- all 5 aspects contribute to all sexual offences, just different patterns for different individuals
- lead to an understanding of how an offenders behaviour changes over a series of offences
- establish whether 2 or more offences were committed by the same person
Canter+Heritage pros and cons?
Pros:
✔️concurrent validity
✔️reliable as consistent across cases
Cons:
✖️ethnocentrism as only studied third crime of a serial killer
✖️low population validity