Voluntary Manslaughter Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What type of defence is loss of control?

A

A statutory, partial and specific defence to murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where can loss of control be found?

A

The Coroners and Justice Act 2009

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does s54 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

D shall not be convicted of murder but of voluntary manslaughter if?

-D’s conduct resulted from a loss of self control
-The loss of self control had a qualifying trigger
-A person of D’s age and sex in D’s circumstances, with normal tolerance and self restraint, might have done a similar thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does Jewell define a loss of self control?

A

Losing the ability to act in accordance with considered judgement or a loss of normal powers of reasoning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What behaviours or emotions might indicate a loss of self control?

A

-D snaps
-Rage
-Anger
-Aggression/ violence
-Shaking/ crying
-Calmness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does s54(2) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

The loss of self control doesn’t need to be sudden although the sooner the loss of control is after the qualifying trigger, the easier it will be to prove.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case is an example of s54(2)?

A

R v Dawes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What kind of circumstances might make a person slower or quicker to lose control?

A

-Gender
-Short temper
-Cumulative provocation
-Intoxication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does s54(4) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

The defendant can’t use the defence of loss of control if he acted out of a ‘considered desire for revenge’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How was s54(4) applied to R v Jewell?

A

It was decided that there was a considered desire for revenge so D couldn’t use the defence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does s54(1)(b) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

D’s loss of self control must come from a qualifying trigger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does s55(3) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

To use the fear trigger, D’s loss of control must come from D’s fear of serious violence from V against D or another identified person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What happened in R v Ellis?

A

The older brother couldn’t use the defence because he had a considered desire for revenge meaning s54(4) applies. The younger brother feared serious harm for his brother so he could use s55(3) and so the defence of loss of control applies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is the fear trigger judged?

A

Subjectively, so if D genuinely fears serious harm from V, D can use the defence even if D’s fear is unreasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does s55(4) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

To use the anger trigger, D’s loss of control must come from things said or done by V which must be of an extremely grave character and give D a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happened in Evans?

A

D could not use the anger trigger because the refusal of the offer of a cup of tea was not of an extremely grave character nor was it justifiable to feel seriously wronged because it was very trivial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What does s55(6)(c) Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

The fact that the thing said or done constituted sexual infidelity must be disregarded (i.e you can’t use sexual infidelity as a qualifying trigger).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What did the court say about sexual infidelity in R v Clinton?

A

If only sexual infidelity is relied on for qualifying triggers, it must be disregarded. But it would be unrealistic to exclude it where it is integral to the facts of a case (it can be used as context when necessary).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What does s55(6)(a) and (b) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

D cannot use the defence if he incites the fear or anger trigger in order to provide himself with an excuse for violence.

20
Q

What does s54(1)(c) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

A person of D’s sex and age, with a normal degree of tolerance and self restraint and in the circumstances of D, might have reacted in the same or a similar way to D.

21
Q

What does s54(3) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 say?

A

The circumstances of D refers to all of D’s circumstances other than those whose only relevance to D’s conduct is that they bear on D’s general capacity for tolerance or self-restraint. (i.e if D has a short temper this will generally not be considered).

22
Q

When can factors affecting D’s general capacity for tolerance or self-restraint be considered?

A

Asmelash- when they are relevant/ linked to the thing said or done by V (for example if D was being teased for having a short temper).

23
Q

What is the test for s54(1)(c) of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009?

A

Would a (insert sex and age) who (insert relevant circumstances) but with normal levels of tolerance and self restraint have done something similar to (insert what D did)?

24
Q

Which act gave the 4 elements of diminished responsibility?

A

s2 Homicide Act 1957 (amended by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009)

25
Q

What are the 4 elements of diminished responsibility?

A

-D was suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning
-Arising from a recognised medical condition
-As to substantially impair D’s ability to understand the nature of his conduct, or form a rational judgement, or exercise self control
-And provides an explanation for D’s acts/ omissions in doing/ being party to the killing.

26
Q

Who has the burden of proof for proving diminished responsibility and what is the standard of proof?

A

D must prove it on the balance of probabilities.

27
Q

What is the definition of abnormality of mental functioning?

A

Byrne- a state of mind/ mental functioning so different from that of an ordinary human being that a reasonable man would term it abnormal.

28
Q

What do you look for in scenarios when dealing with abnormality of mental functioning?

A

The symptoms D is displaying.

29
Q

How does D show they are suffering from a recognised medical condition?

A

Psychiatric evidence.

30
Q

What was the recognised medical condition in Martin?

A

Paranoid personality disorder

31
Q

What was the recognised medical condition in Ahluwalia?

A

Battered woman’s syndrome

32
Q

What was the recognised medical condition in Seers?

A

Depression

33
Q

What was the recognised medical condition in Brown?

A

Extreme stress

34
Q

What was the recognised medical condition in Edgington?

A

Schizophrenia and bipolar

35
Q

What was the recognised medical condition in Hennessy?

A

Diabetes

36
Q

What does not count as a recognised medical condition?

A

Di Duca- the immediate effects of alcohol or drugs

37
Q

When can alcohol or drugs be used as a recognised medical condition?

A

Wood- with an alcohol or drug addiction/ dependency

38
Q

When can brain damage be a recognised medical condition?

A

R v Tandy- when the brain is damaged from alcohol or drug misuse or an injury.

39
Q

What does substantially impaired mean?

A

R v Golds- when the impairment made a real difference to D’s conduct.

40
Q

What does it mean for D to not understand the nature of their conduct?

A

D thinks they are doing one thing and in fact are doing another.

41
Q

What does it mean for D to not be able to form a rational judgement?

A

D’s reason for killing is not rational.

42
Q

What does it mean for D not to be able to exercise self control?

A

D can’t control desires or urges.

43
Q

Where is the last element of diminished responsibility defined?

A

s2(1B) of the Homicide Act 1957

44
Q

What is the definition of the last element of diminished responsibility?

A

The abnormality of mental functioning provides an explanation for D’s conduct if it causes or is a significant contributory factor in causing D to carry out that conduct.

45
Q

What is the legal principle of Dietschmann?

A

Other factors can be ignored as long as the abnormality is a significant factor in causing D to act the way they did.