Attempted Crimes Flashcards

1
Q

Which Act covers criminal attempts?

A

Criminal Attempts Act 1981

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does s1(1) of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 say?

A

D is guilty if, with intent, he commits an act that is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the AR of attempts?

A

Perform an act that is more than merely preparatory to committing a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the MR of attempts?

A

D intends to commit that crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 3 main cases on what counts as more than merely preparatory?

A

-R v Gullefer
-R v Jones
-R v Geddes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does R v Gullefer say?

A

D must have started the actual crime, not just prepared to commit it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does R v Jones say?

A

More than merely preparatory doesn’t mean the very last act before the crime is complete, just that D has started the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does R v Geddes say?

A

To work out if the crime is more than merely preparatory we should ask:

-Had the accused moved from planning/preparation to execution/implementation?

-Had the accused done an act showing he was actually trying to commit the full offence, or had he only got as far as getting ready, or putting himself in a position or equipping himself to do so?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which mens rea is specified by s1(1)?

A

Direct intention (R v Mohan).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What type of mens rea must D have for attempted murder?

A

R v Whybrow- D can’t have implied malice for murder, it must be express.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Is conditional intent sufficient for attempted theft?

A

Attorney General’s Reference (No 1 and 2 of 1979)- conditional intent is fine for attempted theft; D doesn’t need a specific object in mind.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does R v Shivpuri say?

A

It is a crime to attempt to do the impossible offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which sections of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981 apply to impossible offences?

A

-s1(2)
-s1(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does s1(2) say?

A

A person may be guilty of attempting to commit an offence even though the facts are such that the commission of the offence is impossible,.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does s1(3) show?

A

It shows that the facts as D believed them to be would give him intent to commit an offence, even though in reality it would be impossible to commit that offence, he will be treated as having the intent to commit that crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How would you explain impossibility in an exam?

A

s1(2) and (3), as confirmed by R v Shivpuri show that D will be guilty of attempting a crime that was actually impossible to complete, if D believed it was actually possible to complete.