Vocab Flashcards

0
Q

Use of comparison to draw a general conclusion. The concussion drawn is strong in relation to the number of likeness between the things compared.

A

Analogy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

In a debate, the side that favors (affirms) changing the status quo to conform to the debate resolution

A

Affirmative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The process of breaking down an idea or a proposition into its elements. Follows a standard process of seeking pro and con positions on stock issues.

A

Analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2 senses of this term are important to debaters. In the first sense, an argument is a message consisting of a conclusion supported by a reason documented by evidence. The emphasis is on a credible proof and logical structure. In the second sense an argument is a confrontation between two parties in disagreement over a claim. The emphasis is on the refutation.

A

Argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

An unsupported statement, a conclusion that lacks evidence for support.

A

Assertion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A prejudice attitude on the part of the source of evidence quoted in a debate.

A

Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A prepared statement of arguments relating to a single point

A

Block

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

An outline of all the arguments on both sides of the debate resolution- an affirmative brief or a negative brief consists of all the arguments on the respective side of the resolution

A

Brief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The affirmative obligation to present a prima facile case supporting the debate resolution

A

Burden of proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A debate team’s basic position on the resolution, made up of all the arguments that the team presents in support of that position.

A

Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

A relationship between 2 phenomena in which one in believed to cause the other

A

Causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The process of meeting and dealing directly with an argument of the opposition. Dealing with an argument implies denial or minimization, but not agreement with it.

A

Clash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A constrictive argument is one offered in support of, or in opposition to, the resolution. A constructive speech is a time period in which it is permissible to present constructive (new) arguments.

A

Constructive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A subdivision of an issue, an argument essential to support a position on an issue. Contentions may consist of either observations or indictments.

A

Contentions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The believability of a statement or its source.

A

Credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A standard of measurement based on an underlying social value.

A

Criterion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A specified time in the debate when competitors are allowed to ask questions to clarify or point out possible areas for arguments

A

Cross examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

A contest of argumentation

A

Debate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

A reason process that takes general statements or premises and draws a conclusion about particular or specific elements.

A

Deduction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

A forced choice of one of only two possible alternative, either of which would be undesirable

A

Dilemma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

A misrepresentation of a piece of evidence

A

Distortion

21
Q

To neglect to carry on an argument, in future speeches, after an opponents response.

A

Drop

22
Q

Scientifically controlled experiments, usually expression in a statistical form.

A

Empirical studies

23
Q

Data that form the basis for conclusions

A

Evidence

24
Q

Single objects or events used to illustrate and show the possibility of generalized categories of similar groups of examples; a type of factual evidence.

A

Example

25
Q

An authority; one whose experience, training or position and study makes his or her testimony acceptable as evidence.

A

Expert

26
Q

To carry an argument another step forward in rebuttal; to answer the opponents challenge and advance beyond it.

A

Extend

27
Q

Actual, observable objects or events I the real world; used as evidence in debate, these facts usually fall into these types: (a) examples, (b) statics, (c) empirical studies

A

Fact

28
Q

A mistaken infrequency; an erroneous conclusion based on faulty reasoning

A

Fallacy

29
Q

A general objective; an aim

A

Goal

30
Q

An undesirable impact resulting from the operation of policy system. The impact may be stated in terms of deprivation or injury to the party affected by the policy

A

Harm

31
Q

A question concerning which the affirmative and negative teams take opposite sides; a major point of disagreement

A

Issue

32
Q

To fulfill the standards of judgement

A

Justification

33
Q

The system of analysis that shows the nature of relationships between statements, between facts and conclusion, causes and effects, and deductions from premises.

A

Logic

34
Q

In debate the side that opposes (negates) the affirmative position and therefore the resolution

A

Negative

35
Q

An affirmative case construction, in which the affirmative using a systems analysis approach that change is inevitable, presents a proposal to direct that change and expects the negative to proposal to direct that change and expects the negative to propose its own policy system.

A

Net benefits

36
Q

The specific program proposed by the affirmative team to implement the debate resolution

A

Plan

37
Q

A means of achieving a goal, an action

A

Policy

38
Q

Values that reflect judgment as what is expedient, that is, what should or should not be done for the common good

A

Political values

39
Q

The assumption that conditions and polices should remain as they are

A

Presumption

40
Q

Latin for “at first look”

A

Prima facile

41
Q

The relative degree of certainty with which an may be drawn – in statistical language that level of confidence that may be placed in a conclusion expressed as a percentage.

A

Probability

42
Q

That which reduces uncertainty and increase the probability of the truth of the claim

A

Proof

43
Q

A debatable statement, open to interpretation, a statement about which reasonable people may accept arguments on either sides

A

Proposition

44
Q

A philosophical framework within which a case is constructed or the criteria for accepting a premise or conclusion

A

Rational

45
Q

A sort speech devoted to (1) rebuilding arguments that have been attacked (2) refuting opposing arguments, and (3) summarizing the debate from the perspective of the speaker

A

Reasoning

46
Q

The process of attacking and and destroying opposing arguments

A

Refutation

47
Q

A proposition stated in the form of a motion before a legislative assembly.

A

Resolution

48
Q

The degree of importance of a conclusion

A

Significance

49
Q

Descriptive or experimental data, often used in drawing mathematical inferences

A

Statistics

50
Q

A series of broad question encompassing the major debatable issues of any proposition of a policy-for example is there a need for change? Will the plan meet the need? Is the plan the most desirable way to meet the need?

A

Stock issues

51
Q

The state of conformity to the intent of the debate resolution

A

Topicality