Vitiating factors - misrepresentation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Element 1

A

Must be a false statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

False statement doesn’t need to be written or verbal it can be a picture

A

Spice girls v Aprilia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Spice girls v Aprilia world service

A

Appearance in photographs were together even though they knew a member was leaving the group. This was a misrepresentation as it was a false statement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Silence can not be a false statement

A

Fletcher v Krell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Fletcher v Krell

A

Silence was not a false statement so this was not a misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exceptions to the silence rule

A
  1. Where circumstances change - keeping silent can be a misrepresentation
  2. A half truth - being economical with the truth
  3. Relationship between parties is based on trust
  4. In Uberrimae Fidei contracts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Where circumstances change

A

With v O’Flannagan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

With v O’Flannagan

A

Should’ve told the purchaser of the change of situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A half truth

A

Dimmock v Hallet

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dimmock v Hallet

A

A part truth about tenants on a land was a misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Parties are in a position of trust

A

Tate v Williamson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Tate v Williamson

A

Breach of trust by a financial adviser was a misrepresentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Uberrimae fidei contracts

A

Lambert v Co-Operative Insurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lambert v Co-operative Insurance

A

Silence about the criminal conviction of her husband was a misrepresentation. Company was entitled to make the policy void and refuse to pay claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Element 2

A

Must be a statement of material fact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Must be a statement of material fact

A

Bissett v Wilkinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Bissett v Wilkinson

A

Genuinely believed his opinion on sheep in the farm to be accurate, so it was not a misrepresentation.

18
Q

Element 3

A

It must have been made by someone, who was a party to the contract

19
Q

Element 4

A

It must have induced the other party to enter the contract

20
Q

Must have induced the other party to enter the contract

A

Attwood v Small

21
Q

Attwood v Small

A

No misrepresentation as the purchaser relied on the survey report and not the sellers statement

22
Q

The point can still be proved even if C could reasonably have checked to see if the statement was true

A

Redgrave v Hurd

23
Q

Redgrave v Hurd

A

Was entitled to rely on the sellers state more and because this was untrue, this was a misrepresentation

24
Q

Misrepresentation to consumers

A

Consumer Protection Regulations 2014

25
Q

Consumer Protection Regulations 2014

A

Information given to a consumer will be treated as a misleading omission:
- When it omits material information that the average consumer needs, according to the context, to make an informed, transactional decision.
- Hides or provides material. Information in an unfair, unintelligible, ambiguous and untimely manner.
- Fails to identify the commercial intent of the commercial practice if this is not already clear from the context.

26
Q

Types of misrepresenation

A
  • Innocent misrepresentation
  • Negligent misrepresentation
  • Fraudulent misrepresentation

Named in Misrepresentation Act 1967

27
Q

Innocent misrepresentation

A

A representation which is genuinely held on reasonable grounds. This is a false statement made honestly and no element of negligence in that belief.
Remedies available is rescission or damages

28
Q

Negligent misrepresentation

A

False statement made by someone who believed the statement to be true but had no reasonable grounds to believe it to be true.
Howard Marine v Ogden
Remedies: Rescission AND/OR Damages

29
Q

Howard Marine v Ogden

A

Had no registration document of dredges so no reasonable to believe the statement to be true

30
Q

Fraudulent misrepresentation

A

Person making the statement induces the contract by making a statement that they know is untrue, or is reckless at to whether or not it is true.
Greenridge v Kempton
Remedies: Rescission or damages, and in some circumstances damages in the tort of deceit may be appropriate

31
Q

Greenridge v Kempton

A

Untrue representation made recklessly or fraudulently by the seller so buyer was entitled to damages

32
Q

What is rescission?

A

Puts parties back into their original position

33
Q

Examples where courts will not use rescission

A
  • Restitution to pre-contract is impossible
  • Contract is affirmed
  • Delay
  • Third party has gained rights
34
Q

Restitution to pre-contract is impossible

A

Clarke v Dickinson

35
Q

Clarke v Dickinson

A

Rescission was not possible as they could not return the partnership

36
Q

Claimant has affirmed the contract

A

Long v Lloyd

37
Q

Long v Lloyd

A

Court refused because by persevering with the contract, indicated willingness to continue

38
Q

Delay

A

Leaf v International Galleries

39
Q

Leaf v International Galleries

A

Rescission was not allowed because of the 5 year delay in bringing the claim

40
Q

Third party has gained rights to the property

A

Lewis v Avery

41
Q

Lewis v Avery

A

Claim for rescission failed, would be unfair to deceptive third party of the purchased car.