Virtual Relationships In Social Media Flashcards

1
Q

Less sd - social media

A

Catfishing
Lack of personal cues
Edit messages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

More sd - social media

A

Anonymity
More Time to think about response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

2 opposing theories

A

Reduced cues theory (sproull + kiesler)
Sd is lower

The hyper personal model (Walther)
Sd is higher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reduced cues theory

A

Sproull + kiesler
CMC (computer mediated communication) r less effective than ftf ones as lack many cues
Physical appearance, face expressions, tone of voice
Leads to de individuation as reduces people’s sense of individual identity encouraging disinhibition
Virtual rels - blunt + even agg communication
U r unlikely to initiate a rel with someone who is impersonal or reveal inter most feelings to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The hyperpersonal model

A

Walther - online rel can be personal + involve greater sd
As cmc rels can quickly develop as sd happens earlier and once established = intimate
Can also end quick cause of high excitement level isn’t matched by level of trust
Walther - selective self presentation = having time to manipulate online image, control
So much easier to manipulate self disclosure to promote intimacy In v rels by self presenting in idealised way
Anonymity - feel less accountable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the boom-and-bust phenomenon?

A

Cooper + sportolari
V rels can end quick as high excitement level of interaction doesn’t match with level of trust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Strangers on a train - Bargh

A

When confederates disclosed intimate details of their lives to strangers, strangers self disclosed personal info back to the confederate
Won’t see them again
Info likely to remain confidential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Gates and examples

A

Feature/obstacle that could interfere with the development of a face to face relationship
Attractiveness, stammer, disability, age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Absence of gating in virtual relationships

A

People r free to create inline identities they could not do as easily in real life
These gates can remain hidden online
Allows sd + intimacy to develop with communication
Introvert could become an extrovert
Individuals stretch the truth to seem more desirable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Support for absence of gating

A

McKenna + Bargh found that socially anxious people feel they r able express themselves more in social media than ftf relationships + 70% of these survived more than 2 years which is longer than most rels ftf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Support - bargh

A

Train study

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lim - ruppel et al

A

Ma of 25 studies that compared sd in ftf and virtual interactions
Found self report studies showed mire breath an depth in ftf rels than virtual

Self report tho - sdb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lim of reduces cues theory

A

Ther r online cues
Walther + Tidwell
We use emojis as subs facial expressions, capitals, shouting and timing of messages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly