VIOLENCE OFFENCES Flashcards
Liability: WOUNDS WITH INTENT TO GBH
S188(1) Crimes Act 1961
With intent to cause GBH To any person Wounds or Maims or Disfigures or Causes GBH To any person
INTENT *
There must be an intention to commit the act and to get a specific result. The act or omission must be done deliberately and be more than accidental.
R v TAISALIKA
R v TAISALIKA *
The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.
GBH *
Harm that is really serious.
DPP v SMITH
DPP v SMITH *
Bodily harm needs no explanation and grievous means no more and no less than really serious.
WOUND *
R v WATERS
A wound is a breaking of the skin evidenced by the flow of blood. May be internal or external.
R v WATERS *
A wound is a breaking of the skin evidenced by the flow of blood. May be internal or external.
MAIMS *
Deprive the victim of the use of a limb or of one of the senses. Needs to be some degree of permanence.
DISFIGURES *
To deform or deface; to mar or alter the figure or appearance of a person.
R v RAPANA and MURRAY
Disfigure covers not only permanent damage but also temporary.
DOCTRINE OF TRANSFERRED MALICE *
It is not necessary that the person suffering the harm was the intended victim.
INJURE *
S2 Crimes Act 1961
Means to cause actual bodily harm
R v DONOVAN *
Bodily harm includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim. It need not be permanent but must be more than transitory and trifling.
WHAT MUST BE PROVED FOR RECKLESSNESS? *
When recklessness is an element in an offence the following must be proved:
- That the defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk (subjective)
- That the risk was one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they were known to the defendant (objective – would a reasonable person take the risk)
R v CAMERON
R v CAMERON *
Recklessness is established if:
(a) the defendant recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(i) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; and/or
(ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed; and
(b) having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable
R v TIPPLE
Recklessness requires that the offender know of or have a conscious appreciation of the relevant risk and it may be said that it requires a deliberate decision to run the risk.
PERSON *
Gender neutral. Determined by judicial notice, circumstantial evidence.
FACILITATE *
To make possible or make easy/easier.
AVOID DETECTION *
The offender causes the specified harm to prevent himself or another person from being caught in the act.
AVOID ARREST OR FACILITATE FLIGHT *
The specified harm is caused to enable the offender or offenders to more easily effect their escape or to prevent their capture
IMPRISONABLE OFFENCE *
An offence punishable by imprisonment.
R v WATI *
There must be proof of the commission or attempted commission of a crime either by the person committing the assault of by the person whose arrest or flight he intends to avoid or facilitate.
R v TIHI *
It must be shown that in addition to facilitating the imprisonable offence that the offender meant to cause the specified harm or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it.
STUPEFY *
To induce a state of stupor; to make stupid, groggy or insensible; to dull the senses or faculties.
R v STURM
R v STURM *
To stupefy means to cause an effect on the mind or nervous system of a person which really seriously interferes with that persons mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime.
RENDER UNCONSCIOUS *
To render means to cause to be or to become. The offender’s actions must cause the victim to lose consciousness.
R v CROSSAN *
Incapable of resistance includes a powerlessness of the will as well as a physical incapacity.
BY ANY VIOLENT MEANS *
Violent means is not limited to physical violence and may include threats of violence depending on the circumstances.
FOR AGGRAVATED ASSAULT, DOES THE IMPRISONABLE OFFENCE NEED TO BE COMPLETE? *
Provided they have the necessary intent at the time the harm is caused it is immaterial whether they actually commit the intended imprisonable offence or not.