VIOLENCE - Definitions Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

THEFT

A

THEFT - Section 219(1), Crimes Act 1961

  • Dishonestly
  • without claim of right
  • takes
  • any property
  • with intent to
  • deprive any owner permanently of that property or of any interest in that property.
  • Theft is complete the moment the item is moved with the intent to steal it.

R V SKIVINGTON

“Larceny [or theft] is an ingredient of robbery, and if the honest belief that a man has a claim of right is a defence to larceny, then it negatives one of the ingredients in the offence of robbery, without proof of which the full offence is not made out.”

R V LAPIER

Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession by the thief is only momentary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PROPERTY

A

PROPERTY - s2, Crimes Act 1961

Property includes any real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, [money, electricity,] and any debt, and thing in action and any other right or interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ASSAULT

A

ASSAULT – s2, Crimes Act 1961

Intentionally applying or attempting to apply force to the person of another, directly or indirectly,

or threatening by any act or gesture to apply such force to the person of another,

if the person making the threat has, or causes the other to believe on reasonable grounds that he has, present ability to effect his purpose.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PROVING INTENT/INFERRED INTENT

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

A

PROVING INTENT/INFERRED INTENT

Circumstantial evidence from which an offender’s intent may be inferred can include:

  • The offender’s actions and words before, during and after the event
  • The surrounding circumstances
  • The nature of the act itself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

VIOLENCE

A

VIOLENCE

In the context of robbery it must be

  • more than a minimal degree of force; and
  • more than a technical assault ;
  • but does not require physical bodily injury.

PENEHA v POLICE

The actions of the defendant forcibly interfered with personal freedom or amount to forcible, powerful or violent action or motion producing a very marked or powerful effect tending to cause bodily injury or discomfort.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Threats

A

Threats

  • A direct or veiled warning that violence will be used..

May also be conveyed by

  • The defendant’s conduct, demeanour or appearance.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Extort

A

Extort

  • “to obtain by coercion or intimidation.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

To Prevent

A

To Prevent

means “to keep from happening.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Overcome

A

Overcome

To “defeat; to prevail over; to get the better of in a conflict.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

ROBS

A

ROBS

Robbery - Section 234(1), CA61

Theft accompanied by violence or threats of violence to any person or property used to extort the property stolen or used to overcome resistance to the property being stolen.

All ingredients must be proved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Causes GBH

A

Causes

A person causes GBH

  • If his actions make him criminally responsible for it.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Grievous Bodily Harm

A

Grievous Bodily Harm

GBH can be defined as harm that is really serious.

DPP v SMITH

Bodily harm needs no explanation, grievous means no more and no less than really serious.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

PERSON

A

PERSON

Gender neutral proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

At the time

A

At the time

  • During the commission of the theft coupled with the required intent.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Being together with

A

Being together with:

There must be proof that, in committing the robbery, the defendant was part of a joint enterprise by two or more persons who were physically present at the robbery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Being Armed

A

Being Armed

The defendant is carrying the item or has it available for immediate use as a weapon.

17
Q

Offensive Weapon

A

Offensive Weapon – Section 202A (1) Crimes Act 1961

  • any article made or altered
  • used to cause bodily injury or
  • intended for such a use.
18
Q

Instrument

A

Instrument

Any item

  • intended to be used as a weapon or
  • used to intimidate and overbear the victim.
19
Q

Anything appearing as such

A

Anything appearing as such

It must be proved that

  • The item appeared to be an offensive weapon or instrument; and
  • The defendant intended or was reckless that it would be perceived as a weapon.
20
Q

Intent

A

Intent

A person does something intentionally if the mean to do it. They desire a specific result and act with the aim or purpose of achieving it. (MOHAN, WAKKA & MOHI).

R v Mohan

Intent involves “a decision to bring about, in so far as it lies within the accused’s power, the commission of the offence

R v Waaka

A “fleeting or passing thought” is not sufficient; there must be a “firm intent or a firm purpose to effect an act”

R v Taisalika

The nature of the blow and the gash which it produced on the complainant’s head would point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.

21
Q

Grievous bodily harm

A

Grievous bodily harm

Grievous bodily harm can be defined simply as “harm that is really serious”.

DPP v Smith

“Bodily harm” needs no explanation and “grievous” means no more and no less than “really serious”.

22
Q

Actual bodily harm

A

Actual bodily harm

  • Actual bodily harm may be internal or external, and it need not be permanent or dangerous.

R v Donovan

‘Bodily harm’ … includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of [the victim] … it need not be permanent, but must, no doubt, be more than merely transitory and trifling.

23
Q

PERSON

A

PERSON

Gender neutral proven by judicial notice or circumstantial evidence

24
Q

WOUND

A

WOUND

R v WATERS

A wound is the breaking of the skin with the flow of blood and can be internal or external.

25
Q

MAIMS

A

MAIMS

  • mutilating, crippling or disabling a part of the body
  • so the victim is deprived of the use of a limb or one of the senses.
26
Q

DISFIGUREMENT

A

DISFIGUREMENT

  • To deform, deface, mar or alter the figure or appearance of a person.
27
Q

Reckless Disregard

A

Reckless Disregard

  • While it is necessary to prove that the defendant foresaw the risk of injury to others,
  • it is not necessary that he recognized the extent of the injury that would result.
28
Q

COMMIT

A

COMMIT

To do, perform, perpetrate

29
Q

FACILITATE

A

FACILITATE

  • To make possible or
  • To make easy or easier.
30
Q

IMPRISONABLE OFFENCE

A

IMPRISONABLE OFFENCE

Normal meaning – any offence punishable by a term of imprisonment

31
Q

Avoid Detection

A

Avoid Detection

Offender causes the specified harm to prevent himself or another person from being caught in the act.

32
Q

Avoid Arrest

A

Avoid Arrest

Acts done by offenders to avoid their own or other’s arrest

33
Q

INTENT & OFFENCE PROVEN

(Two-fold test for intent)

Relates to Aggravated Wounding

A

INTENT & OFFENCE PROVEN (Two-fold test for intent)

The Defendant

  • Intended to commit an imprisonable offence or one of the intents specified in paras (a) (b) (c)

AND

  • Intended or was reckless in causing the specified harm.

R v Tihi

In addition to one of the specific intents outlined in paragraphs (a), (b) or (c), “it must be shown that the offender either meant to cause the specified harm, or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it”.

34
Q

Stupefy

A

Stupefy

R V STURM

  • To cause an effect
  • On the mind or nervous system of a person
  • Which seriously interferes with their mental or physical ability
  • To act in any way that may hinder the intended crime.
35
Q

RENDER UNCONCIOUS

A

RENDER UNCONCIOUS

  • To cause to be rendered unconscious.
  • Must cause victim to lose consciousness.
36
Q

Incapable of Resistance

A

Incapable of Resistance

  • A powerlessness of the will; and
  • A physical incapacity.

R v CROSSAN

37
Q

ILL TREATMENT OR NEGLECT OF A CHILD OR VULNERABLE ADULT

  • Who does the offence apply to?
  • What are the mens rea and actus rea?
A

ILL TREATMENT OR NEGLECT OF A CHILD OR VULNERABLE ADULT s195 CA61

The offence applies to

  • Members of the same household as the victim
  • People who are staff members of any hospital, institution or residence where the victim resides

Mens Rea

  • KNOWS the victim is at risk of death, GBH or sexual assault as a result of an act or omission of another person; and

Actus Reus

  • FAILS to take responsibile steps to protect the victim from that risk.
38
Q

THEFT BY SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP

A

Theft by person in special relationship - s220 CA61

(1) This section applies to any person who has

  • received or has possession of or control over,
  • any property and
  • knows they are required to—

(a) account to any other person for that property, or proceeds; or
(b) deal with the property, or proceeds on behalf of any other person.