Violence Flashcards

1
Q

What was held in DPP v SMITH?

A

GBH - ‘grievous’ - really serious and bodily harm needs no explanation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was held in R v Rapana & Murray?

A

Disfigures - covers not only permanent damage, but also temporary damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was held in R v Waters?

A

A wound is a breaking of the skin, evidenced by the flow of blood. May be internal or external.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was held in R v Wati?

A

There must be proof of the commission or attempted commission of a crime either by the person committing the assault or by the person whose arrest or flight he intends to avoid or facilitate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was held in R v Tipple?

A

Recklessness requires that the offender know of or have the conscious appreciation of the relevant risk, and it may be said that it requires a “deliberate decision to run the risk”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was held in Cameron v R?

A

Recklessness is established if:
(A) recognised that there was a real possibility that:
(I) his or her actions would bring about the proscribed result; (subjective test) and/or -
(Ii) that the proscribed circumstances existed and:
(B) having regard to that risk these actions were unreasonable (objective test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was held in R v Broughton?

A

threat of violence
Manifestation of an intention to inflict violence. Direct or veiled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was held in R v Taisalika?

A

INTENT
Nature of blow and the gash which it produced point strongly to the presence of the necessary intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define the term “maiming”

A

Depriving another of the use of such of his members as may render him the less able in fighting, either to defend himself or to annoy his adversary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define the term disfigurement

A

To deform or deface; to mar or alter the figure of appearance of a person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the “Doctrine of Transferred Malice”?

A

It is not necessary that the person suffering the harm was the intended victim. Where the defendant mistakes the identity of the person injured, or where harm intended for one person is accidentally inflicted on another, he is still criminally responsible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define the term injure

A

Means to cause actual bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was held in R v Donovan?

A

“Bodily harm” - includes any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with the health or comfort of the victim. It need not be permanent, but must, no doubt, be more than merely transitory and trifling.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define the term “reckless”

A

Consciously and deliberately taking an unjustifiable risk.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What must be proved for reckless?

A

That the defendant was:
- aware of the risk and proceeded regardless (a subjective test); and
- that it was unreasonable for him to do so (an objective test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was held in R v Tihi?

A

It must be shown that the offender either meant to cause the specified harm, or foresaw that the actions undertaken by him were likely to expose others to the risk of suffering it.

17
Q

Define the term stupefy

A

To cause an effect on the mind or nervous system of a person, which really seriously interferes with that person’s mental or physical ability to act in any way which might hinder an intended crime.

18
Q

What are the elements of assault?

A

For conviction, you will need to prove all the elements of Assault. They are:
- intention to apply or attempt to apply force to another
- application or attempted application of force, whether directly or indirectly, or
- threaten to apply force in circumstances where the victim believes the offender will be able to carry out the threat

19
Q

What was held in R v Pekepo?

A

A reckless discharge of a firearm in the general direction of a passer-by who happens to be hit is not sufficient proof. An intention to shoot a person must be established.

20
Q

What is the definition of discharge?

A

To fire or shoot.

21
Q

What is the definition of a firearm?

A

firearm—
(a)
means anything from which any shot, bullet, missile, or other projectile can be discharged by force of explosive; and
(b)
includes—
(i)
anything that has been adapted so that it can be used to discharge a shot, bullet, missile, or other projectile by force of explosive; and
(ii)
anything which is not for the time being capable of discharging any shot, bullet, missile, or other projectile but which, by its completion or the replacement of any component part or parts or the correction or repair of any defect or defects, would be a firearm within the meaning of paragraph (a) or subparagraph (i); and
(iii)
anything (being a firearm within the meaning of paragraph (a) or subparagraph (i)) which is for the time being dismantled or partially dismantled; and
(iv)
any specially dangerous airgun

22
Q

What is the definition of the term explosive?

A

explosive—
(a)
means any substance or mixture or combination of substances which in its normal state is capable either of decomposition at such rapid rate as to result in an explosion or of producing a pyrotechnic effect; and
(b)
without limiting paragraph (a), includes gunpowder, nitroglycerine, dynamite, gun-cotton, blasting powder, fulminate of mercury or of other metals, coloured flares, fog signals, fuses, rockets, percussion caps, detonators, cartridges, and ammunition of all descriptions; and
(c)
without limiting paragraph (a) or paragraph (b), includes any device, contrivance, or article, which uses any substance or mixture or combination of substances to which paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) applies as an integral part of it for the purposes of producing an explosion or a ballistic or pyrotechnic effect; but does not include a firearm; and
(d)
does not include any firework as defined in section 2 of the Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996

23
Q

What type of substance is boiling water?

A

Destructive.

24
Q

When are the offences under 198 completed?

A

Although offences under s198(1)(a) require the actual discharge of a firearm at a person, under s198(1)(b) it is not necessary for an explosion to occur; the offence is complete when an explosive or an injurious substance or device is sent, delivered, or put in place. However, the substance must have the capacity to explode or cause injury.

25
Q

Define the term property?

A

Includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, money, electricity, and any debt, and any thing in action, and any other right or interest.

26
Q

Define the term “Uses in any manner whatever” (in relation to S198A)

A

It is sufficient if the defendant has handled or manipulated the firearm so as to convey an implied threat of its further use against the police officer.

27
Q

What was held in R v Kelt?

A

Very close physical link/degree of immediate control of firearm - re has firearm with him.

28
Q

What was held in Simester and Brookbanks?

A

Knowing means “knowing or correctly believing”… the defendant may believe something wrongly but cannot ‘know’ something that is false.

29
Q

What was held in Fisher v R?

A

It is necessary in order to establish a charge under section 198A(2) for the Crown to prove that the accused knew someone was attempting to arrest or detain him because otherwise the element of mens rea of intending to resist lawful arrest or detention cannot be established.