Sexual Offences CIB 007 Flashcards
Define Rape
Is a specific form of sexual violation that involves the non-consensual penetration of the complainant’s genitalia by the offender’s penis.
Define Unlawful Sexual Connection
(3) Person A has unlawful sexual connection with Person B if Person A has sexual connection with Person B -
(a) without Person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that Person B consents to the connection
What must be proved for a sexual violation by the Crown?
In all cases of sexual violation the Crown must prove beyond reasonable doubt that:
1) there was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection with the complainant, AND
2) the complainant did not consent to the sexual act, AND
3) the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting, OR
4) if the offender did believe the complainant was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable.
What must any investigation prove in sexual violation?
Either:
1) the defendant knew they did not have the victim’s consent but acted anyway (the offender’s mens rea), OR
2) the defendant’s grounds for believing that the victim consented to the act were unreasonable.
Define Sexual Violation, S128 CA1961.
(1) Sexual violation is the act of a person who -
(a) rapes another person; or
(b) has unlawful sexual connection with another person
(2) Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B’s genitalia by person A’s penis -
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection.
(3) Person A has unlawful sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B -
(a) without person B’s consent to the connection; and
(b) without believing in reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection
(4) One person may be convicted of the sexual violation of another person at a time when they were married to each other.
Define Sexual Connection S2 CA1961 (Interpretation)
Sexual Connection means -
(a) connection effected by the introduction into the genitalia or anus of one person, otherwise than for genuine medical purposes, of -
(i) a part of the body of another person; OR
(ii) an object held or manipulated by another person; OR
(b) connection between the mouth or tongue of one person and a part of another person’s genitalia or anus; OR
(c) the continuation of connection of a kind described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b)
Define ‘slightest degree of penetration is sufficient’ S2 CA1961 (interpretation)
(1A) introduction to the slightest degree is enough to effect a connection.
- penetration of the genitalia or anus must be proved, the extent of the penetration is not relevant; any degree of penetration, no matter how slight or fleeting, is sufficient.
Proof of penetration can be established by:
1) the complainant’s evidence
2) medical examination, including physical injuries and DNA evidence
3) the defendant’s admissions
Define Genitalia S2 CA1961
Genitalia includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to naturally occurring male or female genitalia (where the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
Case Law: R v Koroheke 28/11/01, CA189/01
The genitalia comprise the reproduction organs, interior and exterior… they include the vulva (and) the labia, both interior and exterior, at the opening of the vagina.
Case Law: R v N
“Is sufficiently proved by penetration of the vulva by the penis… proof of penetration of the vagina is not required”
Define Penis S2 CA1961 (interpretation)
Penis includes a surgically constructed or reconstructed organ analogous to a naturally occurring penis (whether the person concerned is male, female, or of indeterminate sex)
Penetration of the anus, what charge would be appropriate?
Sexual violation by unlawful sexual connection S128(1)(b)
Anus is not included within the definition of genitalia, and therefore non-consensual penile penetration of the anus is not rape.
S127 CA1961 - what is it?
No presumption because of age. There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age.
What must the Crown prove to show that sexual connection is unlawful?
1) Subjective test - the complainant did not consent to the sexual act; AND
2) Subjective test - the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting; OR
3) Objective test - if he did believe she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable.
Define consent
Consent is a person’s conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another.
Case Law: R v Cox 7/11/96, CA213/96. What was held?
Consent must be “full, voluntary, free and informed… freely and voluntarily given by a person in a position to form a rational judgment”
Case Law: R v Gutuama 13/12/01, CA275/01. What was held?
Under the objective test the Crown must prove that “no reasonable person in the accused’s shoes could have thought that (the complainant) was consenting”
What is Section 128A, CA1961?
Allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances.
Section 128A, CA 1961 - Allowing sexual activity does not amount to consent in some circumstances. What are they?
1) a person does not consent to sexual activity just because he or she does not protest or offer physical resistance to the activity.
2) a person does not consent to sexual activity if he or she allows the activity because of -
(A) force applied to him or her or some other person; or
(B) the threat (express or implied) of the application of force to him or her or some other person; or
(C) the fear of the application of force to him or her or some other person
3) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is asleep or unconscious.
4) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is so affected by alcohol or some other drug that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.
5) A person does not consent to sexual activity if the activity occurs while he or she is affected by an intellectual, mental, or physical condition or impairment of such a nature and degree that he or she cannot consent or refuse to consent to the activity.
6) One person does not consent to an act of sexual activity with another person if he or she allows the sexual activity because he or she is mistake about who the other person is.
7) A person does not consent to an act of sexual activity if he or she allows the act because he or she is mistaken about its nature and quality.
8) This section does not limit the circumstances in which a person does not consent to sexual activity.
9) For the purpose of this section, -
allows includes acquiesces in, submits to, participates in, and undertakes sexual activity, in relation to a person, means -
(a) sexual connection with the person; or
(b) the doing on the person of an indecent act that, without the person’s consent, would be an indecent assault of the person.
Section 129, CA 1961. What is the penalty?
Term of imprisonment: 10 years
How is someone guilty of an attempt to commit an offence?
1) intent to commit the offence, AND
2) take a real and substantial step towards achieving that aim.
Section 129(1), CA 1961. What is it?
Attempts to commit sexual violation.
Define intent?
1) An intention to commit the act
2) An intention to get a specific result
What is a deliberate act?
“Intent” means that act or omission must be done deliberately. The act or omission must be more than involuntary or accidental.
Who proves intent?
The prosecution must prove the offender’s intent beyond reasonable doubt.
How is an offender’s intent inferred?
1) the offender’s actions and words before, during and after the event
2) the surrounding circumstances
3) the nature of the act itself
What must the Crown prove of the defendant’s conduct?
1) intended to have sexual connection with the complainant, AND
2) the complainant did not consent to the intended sexual connection; AND
3) the defendant did not believe on reasonable groups that the complainant was consenting