Vicarious Liability Flashcards
Hawley v Luminar Leisure LTD
Control test - how much control does the employer have over what the employee does and the way in which it is done
Ready Mixed Concrete v MOP
Employee agreed to provide work or skill for a wage , they accept the work then will be subject to control of employer
COX v Ministry of Justice
Court has extended to situations outside of traditional “employment status” court considers if the work is for benefit of employer.
Barclays Bank
No relationship ‘akin to employment’ where the employer is a customer of the tortfeasor
Smith v Stages
Authorised acts
Forbidden acts
Rose v Plenty
Authorised acts carried out in a negligent manner
Century Insurance v NI Transport
An Unauthorised act
Beard v LGOC
Frolic of their own
N v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police
Mohamed v Morrisons supermarkets
- What was the nature of the job
- Was there a sufficient connection between the job and the wrongful conduct to make it right for the employer to be held liable under the principle of social justice
Morrisons v Various Claimants
Was the wrongful conduct so closely connected that it was fair and proper to be in the course of employment