Vicarious Lability Flashcards

1
Q

What is the legal principle set out by the case Yewens v Noakes (1880)?

A

Legal principle: sets out the control test as a way of defining an ‘employee’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was legal principle set out by the case Performing Rights Society v Mitchell and Booker?

A

Legal principle: The nature and degree of control can determine an employee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was the legal principle was set out by the case Mersey Docks and Harbour Board v Coggings and Griffiths Ltd?

A

Legal principle: the control test can be used when employees are borrowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the legal principle set out by the case Hawley v Luminar Leisure?

A

Legal principle: The control test can be used for bouncers outside a premises.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What legal principle was set out by the case Viasystems Ltd v Thermal Transfer Ltd?

A

Legal principle: two employers can be responsible for and employees negligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What authority did the case Ready Mixed Concrete Ltd v Minister of pensions and national insurance set out?

A

It best out the authority for the economic reality or multiple test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What legal principle did the case Cox v Ministry of justice (2016) set out?

A

Legal principle: some may be considered on employee even without a contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What legal principle did the case Fletcher v Chancery Supplies Ltd set out?

A

Legal principle: No vicarious liability as there was no connection between the job and the harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What legal principle did the case Limpus v London General set out?

A

Legal principle: an employer can still be liable even when an employee goes against order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What legal principle did the case Rose v Plenty set out?

A

Legal principle: an employer can still be liable even when an employee goes against orders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What legal principle did the case Twine v Beans Express set out?

A

Legal principle: going against orders can remove liability if the act is not part of the employees job.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What legal principle did the case Beard v London General Omnibus co. set out?

A

Legal principle: if the employee causes injury by doing something outside what he is employed to do the employer will not liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What legal principle did the case Lister v Hesley Hall set out?

A

Legal principle: Established the test for ‘close connection’ between employment and crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What legal principle did the case N v Chief Constable of Merseyside police set out?

A

Legal principle: the use of a uniform to gain trust and commit a crime not a close connection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What legal principle did the case Century Insurance Co. Ltd v Northern Ireland Road Transport Board set out?

A

Legal principle: the employer can be liable for negligent behaviour of their employees and should be more dangerous behaviour clear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What legal principle did the case Hilton v Thomas Burton set out?

A

Legal principle: the employee is not liable if the employee is acting and frolic of his own.

17
Q

What legal principle did the case Smith v Stages set out?

A

Legal principle: the employer is liable if the the employee is being paid to travel.