Versailles + LoN Flashcards

1
Q

What is the treaty of Versailles?

A

The treaty of Versailles was a treaty which signified the end of WW1 on June 29th 1919.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who were the big three?

A

France, The British Empire, The USA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what were the main terms of the ToV

A

Guilt
Germany had to accept sole guilt for starting WW1
Reparations
Germany had to pay £6.6billion to allies, set to last until 1948 (over £400 billion today)
Territory
Germany lost 13% of European territory, 12% population, 16% coal, 48% iron (and the ‘Polish corridor’ separated East Prussia rom rest of Germany)
! ALSO forbade Germany from reuniting with former ally Austria (via Anschluss)
Colonies
G lost all its colonies which was split between France and Britain
Rhineland
No soldiers/fortifications allowed on the Rhineland (bordering France)
Military
G’s army was capped to 100,000 (in 1914 it was at 2 million), its navy could only have 6 battleships, and submarines, aircraft and armoured vehicles were banned.
Conscription was banned, Rhineland became a demilitarised zone
LoN
Organisation made for settling disputes peacefully and avoiding war (Germany not allowed to join)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who of the Big Three would’ve been pleased/not about the guilt term?

A

Fr, Br would have been pleased, however USA would have viewed this as revenge and not liked it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Who of the Big Three would’ve been pleased/not about the reparations term?

A

This would cripple Germany, meaning they would remain weak and not a threat to Fr (+Br)

All 3 would’ve been happy as they all benefited

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who of the Big Three would’ve been pleased/not about the Territory term?

A

Took away money (in terms of coal and iron), keeping G weak
Fr benefited and would have been pleased as they gained land
It didn’t particularly benefit USA, and they might’ve viewed it as too harsh

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who of the Big Three would’ve been pleased/not about the Colonies term?

A

Took away all of G’s international power
Benefited Br and Fr as they gained all colonies and therefore more power.
The USA/Wilson not as pleased because they didn’t like colonies and would rather they be independent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who of the Big Three would’ve been pleased/not about the Rhineland term?

A

More safety and protection for France
This would please France as they have more protection against Germany

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Who of the Big Three would’ve been pleased/not about the military term?

A

It humiliates Germany
It leaves them more vulnerable, meaning they are less likely to go to war
This would please all three as this means more safety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who of the Big Three would’ve been pleased/not about the LoN term?

A

To achieve world peace
USA would be particularly pleased

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What were WIlson’s 14 points?

A

In 1917, when the USA joined WW1, WIlson drew up 14 points as the basis for ending the war fairly and preventing future war

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what’s a summary of Wilsons points (14)

A

A summary of the points:
No secret treaties
Free access to seas in peacetime or wartime
Free trade between countries
All countries to work towards disarmament
Colonies have a say about their own futures
German troops to leave Russia
Independence for Belgium
France to regain Alsace-Lorraine
Frontier between Austria and Italy to be adjusted
Self determination for people in Eastern Europe (rule themselves, not be a part of an empire)
Serbia to have access to the sea
Self determination for people in the Turkish empire
Poland to become an independent state with access to the sea
League of Nations to be set up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How Successfully were the points implemented?

A

Success- many of the points were implemented such as France regaining Alsace and Lorraine, independence for Belgium, Italy - Austria frontier being adjusted, point 10
Not Success- THere was some failed self determination such as when the Ottoman empire was split, British empire, Germany’s colonies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the Paris Peace Conference? 1919-1920

A

The PPC took place in the Palace of Versailles and lasted for 12 months.
At the conference, 32 countries were supposed to be represented, but none of the defeated countries were invited.
5 treaties were drawn up including the ToV (dealing with Germany), and others dealing with Germany’s allies. All important decisions were made by ‘The Big Three’, who were supported by a huge army of diplomats and expert advisers (however they were often ignored).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When was the Paris Peace Conference?

A

1919-1920

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the specific clashes between the Big Three at the Paris peace conference?

A

C vs W - USA did not suffer anywhere as much as Fr and wilson was more generous. They disagreed over the Saar coalfields, Germany’s Rhineland. In the end W had to compromise but in return W got self determination (affecting the other 4 treaties not ToV).
C vs LG - LG didn’t want to be too harsh and C felt that the Br were happy to treat G fairly, where Br and Fr were most under threat but not happy to allow G to keep navy and colonies, which would be more of a threat to Br (Clemenceau thought Britain was self-interested)
W vs LG - Self determination threatened the British empire and Br didn’t want all nations ot have access to the seas

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

In the Paris peace conferences, the B3 used the treaty of Bret-Litvosk to justify their actions.
What was the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk?

A

In March 1918, Russia surrendered to Germany. R lost 34% of its population, 54% of its industry, 89% coal, and lots of its land.
However, this was the old government, which was overthrown at the end of the war, and therefore many Germans found this unfair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What were German criticisms of the Treaty of Versailles?

A

Germans had to accept blame for everything - they disagreed and felt at least that the blame was shared
also bitter that germany was expected to pay for all damages of war even though Germany’s economy was severely weakened
Disarmament was very small for a country of Germany’s size, the army was a symbol of German pride. No other countries were forced to disarm in this way despite W14P calling for this
The loss of territory was a huge blow for Germans as it damaged both their pride and economy. E.g., both the Saar and Upper Silesia were important industrial areas. In addition, Br and Fr were gaining power from their colonies whilst Germany just grew weaker
Non representation meant that Germany’s government was not represented at peace talks and was treated harshly
Not being invited to LoN, forbidden Anschluss with Austria etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What was the Weimar republic?

A

The ‘government’ of Germany from 9th November 1918 to 23rd March 1933. This new government overthrew the government that took Germany to war in 1914, (in the revolution in 1918). They hoped for fair, equal treatment from the allies but were horrified when the terms of the ToV were announced (7th May). It seemed as though war would break out as the new government rejected the treaty, however they could not afford another war.
In the Weimar republic there were left and right wing parties, the left wanted equality, worker’s rights etc., and the right wing valued the importance of traditional values, supported capitalism, and were nationalistic.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What were the issues in the Weimar republic?

A

the threat from the left (e.g., Spartacist uprising), and right (Kapp Putsch, Munich Putstch), other problems like occupation fo the Ruhr and hyperinflation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what threats were there from the left for the Weimar republic?

A

The spartacist uprising was a general strike against the government from the 4th-15th January 1919. The leaders of the Spartacists were Rosa Luxemborg and Karl Leibknecht and they wanted to achieve a communist revolution, inspired by the Bolsheviks in Russia in 1917. They were supported by some soldiers and sailors.
The leader of Germany, Freidreich Ebert, was forced to bring in the Freikorps, groups of ex-soldiers who had not/refused to disarm. They hated the communists more than they hated the Weimar Republic so they agreed to help
The uprising was swiftly defeated; both leaders were shot among others. However, the communists were undeterred and continued in Bavaria, Munich being the capital (redistributing food, money, houses to the working class) from 7th April 1919. However in May they were crushed again (by Freikorps) and over 600 communists were killed in Munich alone.
Later on in the Ruhr industrial workers liked the idea of communism and the police, army, Freikorps dealt with it (around 2000 casualties).
This had a negative impact on the Weimar republic as it created chaos, instability, and made the government look weak (like a mouse being thrown between two cats). The treaty of Versailles was not responsible for this as it was before it was signed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what threats were there from the right for the Weimar republic?

A

The Kapp Putsch was a result of the uprising of communism. This is because the government used the Freikorps, ex military and right wing, to crush communism, but after all communist movements were crushed, their nationalist/monarchist views were threats to the new system because many wished to return back to a monarchy. On 29th February 1920, Defence minister Noske ordered the disbandment of the 2 most powerful Freikorps, which set in motion a series of events led by right wing Wolfgang Kapp and other high ranking military personnel. Kapp and his followers seized Berlin.
The government tried to use the army to suppress this new threat however the Freikorps were all ex-army so almost all army units refused to fight all their old comrades. Therefore the German government fled Berlin and Kapp declared himself the chancellor of Germany. In the last attempt, the German government appealed to the workers of Berlin (who were mostly not conservative/communist) to resist the Kapp Putsch. It worked and so a general strike was declared, meaning there was no public transport, factories, or even utilities like oil and gas being supplied. This caused a standstill and Kapp and his followers fled (Kapp died awaiting trial).
It had a negative impact on the Weimar republic as it weakened support. The treaty of Versailles could be partially to blame as it could’ve sparked anger in the German people, making the nationalists become a threat.
The Munich Putsch was a failed attempt by the Nazi party under Adolf Hitler to seize Bavaria from the 8-9th November 1923. Hitler hoped that there would be general right wing support due to the occupation of the Ruhr, hyperinflation which increased poverty and made Germans furious with the government.
In November, he surprised right wing leaders at gunpoint during a meeting and demanded their support; however they were easily defeated by the regular army who had been warned in advance. Despite the failure, Hitler, who was imprisoned, received public support (especially at trial where he presented his revolt as a way to undermine the ToV and make Germany great again). Whilst in prison, where he spent 9 months, he wrote Mein Kampf.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what was the Kapp Putsch?

A

The Kapp Putsch was a result of the uprising of communism. This is because the government used the Freikorps, ex military and right wing, to crush communism, but after all communist movements were crushed, their nationalist/monarchist views were threats to the new system because many wished to return back to a monarchy. On 29th February 1920, Defence minister Noske ordered the disbandment of the 2 most powerful Freikorps, which set in motion a series of events led by right wing Wolfgang Kapp and other high ranking military

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what was the Munich Putsch?

A

The Munich Putsch was a failed attempt by the Nazi party under Adolf Hitler to seize Bavaria from the 8-9th November 1923. Hitler hoped that there would be general right wing support due to the occupation of the Ruhr, hyperinflation which increased poverty and made Germans furious with the government.
In November, he surprised right wing leaders at gunpoint during a meeting and demanded their support; however they were easily defeated by the regular army who had been warned in advance. Despite the failure, Hitler, who was imprisoned, received public support (especially at trial where he presented his revolt as a way to undermine the ToV and make Germany great again). Whilst in prison, where he spent 9 months, he wrote Mein Kampf.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

when was the Munich Putsch?

A

8-9th November 1923

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

when was the Kapp Putsch?

A

Feb 1920

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

when was the occupation of the Ruhr?

A

1923

28
Q

what was the occupation of the Ruhr?

A

The occupation of the Ruhr in 1923 happened because the ToV required Germany to pay reparations. The first instalment of £50 million was paid in 1921, however in 1921, nothing was paid. France and Belgium occupied the Ruhr as it would pay them back through raw materials and goods (legal under the treaty). The German government ordered workers to strike, which in turn made the French very angry, causing 100,000 workers to be expelled from the region and 100 workers to be killed. The strike meant that Germany had no food, goods to trade with, money to buy things leading to hyperinflation.
The occupation of the Ruhr had a negative impact as it caused hyperinflation, caused general unrest, and made Germany look weak

29
Q

what was hyperinflation fo the Weimar Repubic?

A

Some historians say that the reparations were too high and so Germany couldn’t pay, however some say that Germany could pay but simply didn’t want to or wanted to create a crisis to force the international community to revise the terms of the treaty. Either way it is almost no doubt that the reparations caused this and that they were too high.
Hyperinflation was an important issue which was more money being printed as they didn’t have enough, but this meant that the money became worthless and so all prices shot up. Wages were paid daily instead of weekly by the government and big industries were able to pay off huge debts in worthless money. This built resentment with the ToV and government.

30
Q

Was the Treaty of Versailles fair? YES because…

A

Germany got off lightly in the ToV in comparison to the Bret Litvosk
Germany posed a threat after WW1 as it had a growing population, was powerful (with an army of over 2 million)
Germany increased tensions itself in Europe by taking Alsace and Lorraine, and the Naval race between Britain and France.
Germany’s problems were self inflicted - for example Germany racked up huge debts during the was to fund the war (which was worsened by reparations)
Germany’s economic crash was caused by itself
Germany did in fact make many people suffer

31
Q

Was the Treaty of Versailles fair? NO because…

A

Germany was not given a say in the ToV, and it was almost forced to sign it.
Germany was not included in the League of Nations
Germany lost lots of territory, colonies which decreased its strength and power as well as land which could be economically beneficial.
Hyperinflation and reparations made Germany spiral down a path from which they could hardly recover
The reparations were unpayable, and it was evident Germany couldn’t pay
Although the occupation of the Ruhr was legal, it was not fair as it had great economic importance to Germany and many people were injured or killed.
Two wrong things don’t make a right. Just because Germany made a mistake doesn’t mean the new government should suffer

32
Q

what were the other treaties of the ToV?

A

Other settlements in the ToV:
The Treaty of St Germain 1919 - separated Austria from Hungary, A’s army limited to 30,000, and more
The Treaty of Neuilly 1919 - Bulgaria lost land to Greece, Romania, Yugoslavia, lost access to Mediterranean, armed forces limited to 20,000, forced to pay £100 million in reparations, governed by foreign powers by 1920
The Treaty of Trianon 1920 - Hungary lost substantial territory, and population, industries suffered from loss of population and raw materials, it was supposed to pay reparations but its economy was so weak it never did.
Treaty of Sevres 1920 - Turkey lost substantial territory, its original empire was broken up, parts of Turkey were under zones of influence controlled by British, French, or Italians. Armenia and Kurdistan became independent and Turkey’s tax system, finances, and budget were controlled by the allies. Its army was limited to 50,000. More on this on pg. 25 in textbook

33
Q

What was the LoN? What did the B3 want from it?

A

Wilson wanted it to be a world Parliament
Britain wanted it to be small and only used in emergencies
Clemenceau wanted it to be strong, with its own army
The final League ended up being closest to Wilson’s vision, it was an international organisation which every country could join, aiming to increase cooperation and stop war.(It was a precursor for the UN)
To join, countries had to promise to obey the League’s decisions, help each other if invaded, and gradually disarm. If any country started a war, the rest of the countries would stop trading, if necessary, send troops.
The league came into existence on the 10th January 1920. 42 member states met in Geneva for the Assembly’s first session (70% of the world’s population). Its aims were to discourage aggression from any nation, encourage disarmament, co-operation (especially in trade, business), improve living and working conditions in the world.

34
Q

Was the League of Nations a hopelessly optimistic dream?
YES because…

A

Article 5 stated that no decisions could be made unless all countries agreed on it
The USA didn’t join the LoN meaning its power was limited which also made countries like Br and Fr doubtful that the LoN would succeed from the beginning
Incomplete representation among nations - only Britain, France, Italy, and Japan had permanent seats
The LoN had limited power of enforcement
Germany was excluded
Countries had priorities e.g., Br wanted to rebuild British trade and looking after the British empire rather than it being an international police force and Fr was concerned about Germany and that without an army, the League was too weak to protect Fr making Fr prepared to bypass the League if necessary to strengthen its position against G

35
Q

Was the League of Nations a hopelessly optimistic dream?
NO because…

A

Aimed for world peace and many of the articles seemed like a good idea, e.g., Article 8 (more on articles in folder) stated that there would be an aim to reduce armaments, the LoN was planned to be held in Switzerland as it was a neutral country, collective security (article 10-by acting together the LoN could prevent war by defending interests of all nations)

36
Q

Why did the USA not join the LoN?

A
  • The ToV was hated by Americans as they thought it was unfair
  • The League imposed sanctions that the US didn’t want to follow
  • The US didn’t want to use their soldiers
  • Many US citizens were anti-imperialists
  • WIlson needed approval from the congress and the idea of the LoN was not popular (Wilson and the democratic party campaigned for the league, however in 1920 after a stroke Wilson became to ill)
37
Q

Was the LoN was destined for failure since the USA wasn’t a part of it?

A

It was difficult for the LoN to function as even though the USA made the league, it wasn’t a part of it and it was the missing piece for the LoN. It was a symbolic blow to international cooperation as the USA, and extremely rich and powerful country, didn’t join. The USA also benefited from the league. In addition, many at the time believed that the USA was the only nation with the resources and influence to make the league work (especially trade sanctions)

38
Q

How was the league organised?

A

The council
The Assembly
The Secretariat
The Permanent Court of International Justice
The International Labour Organisation (ILO)
The Mandate commission
The Refugees committee
The Slavery Commission
The Health Committee

39
Q

what was the council?

A
  • Smaller than the assembly
  • met 5 times a year (more if emergency)
  • Consisted of permanent members (in 1920 - Br, Fr, It, Jap,) and temporary members (elected by assembly in 3-year periods)
  • main aim to resolve disputes by talking (and using a range of powers like moral condemnation, economic and financial sanctions, military force)
40
Q

what was The Assembly?

A
  • It was the League’s ‘Parliament’
  • every country had a representative which could recommend and action to the council
  • all decisions had to be unanimous
41
Q

what was The Secretariat?

A
  • a civil service serving everyone else in the LoN
  • it kept records of meetings and prepared reports
  • brought together experts for key issues like health, disarmament, economic matters
42
Q

what was The Permanent Court of International Justice?

A
  • was supposed to play a key role in settling disputes peacefully e.g., border disputes but there was no way in making sure rulings were followed
  • was based in Hague and made up of judges form member countries
43
Q

what was The International Labour Organisation (ILO)?

A
  • ILO brought together employees (government workers representative) to improve the conditions of workers around the world by trying to persuade member countries to adapt its suggestions
44
Q

what was The Mandate commission?

A
  • reports are made to the League on conditions in the mandate (colonies given to Br and Fr at Versailles)
45
Q

what was The Refugees committee?

A
  • Helping refugees (e.g., trying to get back to their home in WW1, those who lost their home
  • most pressing problem in the Balkans (Greece, Armenia, Turkey)
46
Q

what was The Slavery Commission?

A
  • working to abolish slavery around the world (e.g., East Africa) and help people who were not technically slaves but treated as such
47
Q

what was The Health Committee?

A
  • dealt with the problem of dangerous diseases and educated people about health and safety
  • brought together experts and worked with charities and other independent agencies to develop programmes to fight disease and collect statistics about health issues
48
Q

How successful was the League of Nations in the 1920s?

A

Although there was no major conflict in the world, this would appear as misleading. After WW1 the emphasis was on domestic and economic reconstruction, with little spare capacity or energy to pursue international disputes (recharging their batteries)
In addition, although it seemed fair, friendly, and a great improvement to archaic systems, countries weren’t willing to sacrifice their opinions for collective security and unless all the interests of the Great powers aligned it was doomed for failure (as it couldn’t do anything). E.g., In Corfu the Anglo-French policy was divided meaning they didn’t want to work together and in the end Italy got what is wanted

49
Q

was the Refugee organisation a success/failure?

A

SUCCESS because…
- 425,000 displaced people were helped
- it was an imaginative logistical triumph
- they found suitable transport, set up camps, created new settlements, taught new trades and skills, issued identity documents etc.
- However, they were constantly short of funds and their work became more difficult in the 30s as the international situation became tense and the authority of the league decided

50
Q

was the Health organisation a success/failure?

A

SUCCESS because…
- Typhus epidemic prevented in SIberia
- vaccines for Diphtheria, TB, Tetanus created
- an international campaign to exterminate mosquitoes was created to prevent malaria and yellow fever
- international campaigns formed to educate people
((became WHO after 1945 showing this))

51
Q

was the Economic and Financial organisation a success/failure?

A

A SUCCESS because…
- aided countries such as Austria, Hungary, Greece, and Bulgaria, with successful resume programmes
- increased trade helped to reduce international tension (making war less likely)

52
Q

was the International Labour organisation a success/failure?

A

a failure because…
- didn’t have much success as they could only recommend actions, which member states could easily ignore
- it was hampered by lack of funds, power and refusal to adopt suggestions because it would cost industries too much (e.g., 48-hr work week)
- however many countries did implement better work practices and hours thanks to the organisation

53
Q

was the Slavery commission a success/failure?

A

a (partial) success because…
- a partial success as it helped white slavery and trafficking with methods such as persistent enquiry, publication reports, and the constant coaxing of governments
- a number of countries abolished slavery overall such as Iraq, Jordan, and Nepal
- organised raids against slave owners and traders in Burma
- 200,000 slaves were freed in Sierra Leone
- However it was still a prevalent issue

54
Q

was the Disarmament commission
a success/failure?

A

a failure because…
they could only recommend actions which could be ignored
- only countries such as Germany disarmed because of the ToV (forced to)
- damaging to the League’s reputation

55
Q

what was the dispute in Vilna? when was it?

A

1920
Poland and Lithuania are 2 new states created by treaties
Vilna was made capital of L, yet population mainly Polish
In 1920, Private Polish Army took control of VIlna causing L to appeal to the League
The League protested to Poland but they didn’t withdraw
The League didn’t send in troops, P kept Vilna

56
Q

was the Vilna dispute a success/failure for LoN?

A

Failure - French not prepared to upset Poland as they wanted a possible ally against Germany and Britain wasn’t prepared to act alone. This and not sending troops in allowed P to get away with it. L was left unhappy and sent a message that League might not act decisively, perhaps encouraging further aggression.

57
Q

what was the dispute in Upper Silesia? when was it?

A

1921
Upper Silesia was an industrial region on the border between Poland and Germany, inhabited by both P and G people
Both countries wanted control over is due to rich and steel industry (profitable)
In 1920 a plebiscite was organised for Silesians to vote on which country they wished to join; Fr and Br troops kept order at polling booths
Industrial areas voted mainly for Germany, Rural for Poland, so the League divided the region along these lines but built in safeguards to prevent future disputes e.g., rail links, water, power supplies were shared. The decision was accepted

58
Q

what was the dispute in Aaland Islands? when was it?

A

1921
Sweden and Finland both wanted Aaland Islands (midway between both countries)
Both were threatening to fight for it
The league decided to give the islands to Finland and Sweden accepted

59
Q

what was the dispute in Corfu? when was it?

A

1923
Greece-Albania border dispute and conference ambassadors given the job to decide who gets what and the Italian general was there to supervise
On the 27th August the Italian general Tellini and his team were murdered on the Greek side
The Italian leader was furious and blamed the Greek government and on the 29th August Italy demanded compensation and for the murderers to be executed
However, the Greeks didn’t know who the killers were
On the 31st August Mussolini occupied Corfu and 15 people were killed
Greece asked the league for help
The league condemned Mussolini’s actions and agreed a sum was to be payed to the League (and given to Italy if the killers were found), however, Mussolini convinced the League that the money should be given to him
Mussolini withdrew from Corfu triumphantly on 27th September

60
Q

what was the dispute in The Geneva protocol? when was it?

A

1924
Britain and France made the protocol so that if 2 countries disagreed they’d have to accept the LoN verdict, in hopes of strengthening the League (especially after the Corfu incident). However, before it could be put into the effect, a general election in Britain meant that the conservatives came into power and they didn’t want to sign it as they were worried Br would be forced into doing something that wasn’t in its own interest

61
Q

what was the dispute in Bulgaria? when was it?

A

1925
In October 1925, Greek troops invaded Bulgaria after an incident on the border where Greek soldiers were killed
Bulgaria appealed for help and the League condemned Greece’s actions and ordered Greece to pull out and pay compensation to Bulgaria
Faced with disapproval, the Greeks obeyed but complained

62
Q

was the Upper Silesia dispute a success/failure for LoN?

A

Success - Both countries had access to supplies such as rail links, water, and power supplies which were built on many safeguards to prevent future disputes. The Silesians were able to decide themselves what they wanted. Showed the League could resolve disputes and strengthened it

63
Q

was the Aaland Islands dispute a success/failure for LoN?

A

Success - war was avoided however Sweden didn’t get what it wanted and the situation could’ve escalated

64
Q

was the Corfu dispute a success/failure for LoN?

A

Failure - 15 people were killed showing the situation had gotten out of hand. Although Mussolini got what he wanted, Greece was left unhappy, mistreated, and forced to take the blame for the situation. The league’s decision was also altered by Mussolini showing that there was one rule for the big powers and another for the smaller ones and that the LoN could be undermined by its members. This made the Leagues credibility worse, and weakened the League.

65
Q

was the Geneva Protocal dispute a success/failure for LoN?

A

Failure - it weakened the League instead of making it stronger (and showed that Britain was self interested?)

66
Q

was the Bulgaria dispute a success/failure for LoN?

A

Failure - it weakened the legitimacy of the League as it seemed that there was one rule for large states and another for smaller states. It also built up tensions in the League. However, it was a partial success as a war didn’t break out.