Venue Flashcards

1
Q

what is venue

A

where among the courts in this judicial system is the appropriate court to hear the case (whether this district is a proper court to hear this action)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

whose responsibility is it to object to improper venue

A

the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what happens if the def fails to make a timely objection to improper venue

A

there is a waiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

when must a claim of improper venue be made

A

at the first opportunity or it is waived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the first opportunity

A

either a pre-answer motion to dismiss if the def chooses to file one, or if he does not choose to file one the defendant’s answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Federal venue is proper in a district: (3)

A

1) where any defendant resides as long as all defendants reside in the same state
2) where the claim arose
3) if neither of the above (rare) any district where the defendant is subject to pj has venue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what does it mean “where the claim arose”

A

where a “substantial part of the events or omissions” on which the claim is based occurred or where a “substantial part of the property” that is subject to the action is located

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

where does fed venue generally not rest

A

does not rest on plaintiff’s residence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what does residence mean for individuals

A

domicile (residence plus an intent to reside there indefinitely)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what does residence mean for business entitites

A

every district in which pj exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the venue for a case that is removed to federal court

A

venue is automatically proper in the fed district where the state court sits, even if that district would have not been proper originally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

when are transfers granted to a different fed court

A

transfers are granted in the interest of justice and for the convenience of the parties and witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the general rule for transfers

A

transfer is only to a district with proper venue ( a place where case could have been brought originally)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the exception to the general rule for transfers

A

transfer to a district without proper venue may occur when all parties agree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

if a case is brought originally in a district with proper venue what happens in regards to transferring

A

may be transferred for convenience to another district with proper venue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

if a case is brought originally in a district without proper venue what happens in regards to transferring

A

case will be dismissed OR transferred to a district with proper venue

17
Q

if a suit is brought in a district with proper venue, whose law controls if it is transferred

A

the law of the transferor (first) forum controls

18
Q

if suit is brought in a district without proper venue, whose law controls if transferred

A

the law of the transferee (second) court controls

19
Q

What is forum non conveniens?

A

common law doctrine allows a court to dismiss an action, even if pj and venue are proper, if the court finds that the forum would be too inconvenient for parties and witnesses, and that another, more convenient venue is available

20
Q

how has the CL forum non conveniens been relaxed?

A

allows the remedy of transfer as opposed to outright dismissal

21
Q

who bears the burden of showing forum non conveniens?

A

the defendant bears the heavy burden of showing the plaintiff’s chosen forum should be displaced

if a forum-selection clause designates a state or foreign forum that modifies the conventional rule, then the burden is on the plaintiff to show why the court should disregard the forum-selection clause