VBM/EVA References Flashcards
O’Hanlon and Peasnell (1998)
suggest very little difference between EVA and residual income
Firk et al. (2016) propose that success of VBM
is dependent on several contingencies, notably firm owners (shareholders) and managers
Firk et al. (2016) found managers
will implement value creating strategies if interests are positively aligned with shareholders
Firk et al. (2016) also found
an externally supportive environment (legislation that prioritises shareholder wealth maximisation) will also support VBM implementation
Malmi and ikaheimo (2003)
consider VBM to be a 6 step process
VBM/EVA in both Malmi and ikaheimo (2003) and Firk et al (2016) papers
depend on external environment which shows similarity to SMA