Vascular II Flashcards
What is a pro/con to direct reconstruction (anatomic reconstruction)?
What is a pro/con to extra-anatomic reconstruction?
- Aorta-iliac bypass
- Normal anatomy (left)
- Percutaneous revascularization (top right)
- Surgical revascularization (bottom right)
-
Direct reconstruction
- Higher morbidity (more complications)
- Better long-term patency
- Aorto-Fem; Fem-Pop; Fem-Tib; etc
-
Extra-anatomic reconstruction (reconstruction does not mimic normal anatomy?)
- Reduced morbidity
- Long term patency inferior to direct reconstruction
- Fem-Fem; Ax-Fem
-
Direct reconstruction
Extra-anatomic bypass is typically reserved for patients deemed particularly high risk for direct surgical reconstruction such as previous graft or stent complication, infection, or previous intra-abdominal surgery with resultant abdominal adhesions. Open revascularization of infrainguinal disease depends on the level of the lesion(s), and may involve the femoral, popliteal, or infrapopliteal vessels.
Risk factors for PAD?
Indications for surgery?
first symptom PAD?
Lower Extremity PAD
- The same risk factors that lead to PAD also cause:
- CAD (50% concurrence)
- CVD
- Aortic vascular disease
-
Indications for surgery for PAD:
- gangrene, ischemic ulceration, & intermittent claudication/ischemic rest pain
- PAD patients are at high risk for adverse CV events
- Previous graft/stent complications, abdominal adhesions
-
Intermittent claudication often first symptom
- Slow, progressive decline in function
Risk factors for PAD
- Nonwhite
- Male
- Age > 50 yo
- Smoking
- DM
- HTN
- HLD
- Chronic renal insufficiency
- Hyperviscous/hypercoaguable states
- Hyperhomocysteinemia
- Elevated inflammatory markers
- Vulnerable to stoke, MI, death
- Tx: Antiplt, anticoagulation medications → when stopped, high risk for periop event
- Vulnerable to stoke, MI, death
Outcomes of patients with PAD?
- Individuals with atherosclerotic lower extremity PAD may be
- asymptomatic (without identified ischemic leg symptoms, albeit with a functional impairment)
- OR have leg symptoms (classic claudication or typical leg symptoms)
- OR present with critical limb ischemia ( CLI ).
- All individuals with PAD face a risk for
- progressive limb ischemic symptoms
- high short-term cardiovascular ischemic event rate
- increased mortality.
- These events rates are most clearly defined for individuals with claudication or CLI and less well-defined for individuals with asymptomatic PAD.
FROM PIC- doubtful we need to know specifics. overall takeaway is these are sick patients with very high moribidty/mortality
What are indications for peripheral revascularization for acute ischemia?
- Acute ischemia patho:
- emboli
- thrombus
- pseudoaneurysm postop from femoral arterial line
- Irreversible ischemic damage:
- occurs 4-6 hours
- Urgent thrombolytic therapy and or angioplasty
- Arteriography → assess flow
- Surgical intervention (emergency case → with full stomach?)
What are indications for peripheral revascularization with chronic ischemia?
- Chronic limb ischemia: demand > supply
- s/s: Rest pain, ulceration, gangrene
- Often present with multi-segmental occlusion
- Patho:
- atherosclerotic plaques progressively narrowing vessel → claudication w/ eventual thrombosis of vessel
- Surgery indicated when:
- severe disabling claudication
- unable to establish METs → will need CV testing (cant walk w/o severe pain)
- critical limb ischemia (limb salvage)
- ankle-brachial index (ABI) is clinical standard for documenting severity of PVD
- severe disabling claudication
- Semi-elective sx (time to optimize)
What is the ankle brahcial index?
- ABI <0.9= PAD diagnosis
- Performed by taking systolic pressure in arms and in legs. Patient should rest supine in warm from for 10 minutes prior to testing
- highest average ankle pressure/highest average arm pressure
- each side done separately
What is the traditional surgical approach for peripheral occlusions?
- Unobstructed blood flow source (donor) artery exposed. Ex:
- common femoral
- superficial femoral
- deep femoral
- Target distal artery (recipient) is exposed at or below the knee. Ex:
- dorsalis pedis artery
- posterior tibial artery
- If saphenous vein used →
- vein dissected all branches ligated → divided and excised (reversed - permits blood flow in direction of valves).
- Proximal anastomosis first with clamping, then can unclamp and move distal
- Bypass area with graft that has reduced flow
Summary of Fem-Pop bypasS?
Anatomic Bypass: ex. Fem-Pop
- After donor and recipient arteries are exposed a tunnel is created and graft is passed
- Graft may be saphenous vein or prosthesis
- Femoral cross clamping is required
- Fewer hemodynamic changes than with AoX
- Heparin IV given
- Anastomosis constructed
- Arteriogram to confirm adequate flow
- Heparin not likely to be reversed
Summary of aorto-fem bpyass?
Anatomic Bypass: Aorto-Fem
- Aortic cross-clamping (Aox) and uncross-clamping is required
- better tolerated than for aneurysmal disease
- more distal clamp location (why its more tolerated)
- likelihood of extensive collateralization related to chronic atherosclerotic disease → tolerate crossclamp better w/ collaterals
- Note: with aneurysms this collateral flow is not present
- better tolerated than for aneurysmal disease
What type of patient is more likely to undergo an extra-anatomic bypass (ie ax-fem/fem-fem bypass)?
Considerations for the procedure?
Do they need to cross clamp during the procedure?
Extra-Anatomic Bypass:
Ax-Fem/ Fem-Fem
- Reserved for high risk patients → examples:
- previous graft or stent complication
- infection
- adhesions from previous abdominal surgery
- No need for Aox and uncross-clamping
- Frequent site:
- axillary artery to ipsilateral femoral artery
- with +/- fem-fem
-
Considerations:
- Less durable → 5 year patency
- Art-line must be on opposite side of Ax-fem site
- → Axillary artery clamping
-
Tunneling (mid-axillary)
-
*key point in the surgery à MOST STIMULATING PART
- Deepen anesthetic!
-
*key point in the surgery à MOST STIMULATING PART
Preop management of LE Revascularization procedures?
- Preop – beta-blockers and/or other chronic medication
-
A-line*
- (plan for very difficult insertion- US recommended)
- Adequate vascular access –>min EBL though
- Continuous EKG monitoring + ST analysis
- Monitor volume status
- Foley catheter
- +/- CVP or PA catheter/ TEE (more likely needed for Aorto-fem with Aox
- Non-invasive/ minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring
- I stat/ Hemochron to follow labs (coag status)
-
For emergency surgery: carefully watch →
- K+ levels
- acidosis
- Myoglobinemia
- Coagulation status
- ECG ischemia
- fasciotomy may be required (compartment syndrome)
Regional vs general for LE revascularization procedures?
Regional vs. General
- Assess for coagulopathy or anticoagulation therapy
- Spinal may be best to avoid hematoma
- Most studies have shown no difference between RA and GA in terms of cardiopulmonary complications**
-
**Significant difference (5X) in complication rate in terms of graft occlusion with regional being superior
- Perfusion to limbs (Regional > GA)
- Studies regarding efficacy of post-op pain mgt. w/ epidural vs. opioids are poorly designed
What is graft occlusion higher with GA versus RA?
Hypercoagulable state with GA as opposed to RA
Reasons:
- With GA →
- Decreased Fibrinolysis → fibrinogen not broken down and clots form
- Increased Epi, NE, and cortisol release (compared to RA)
- Patency of graft maintained with RA secondary to increased blood flow with sympathectomy
Anesthetic maintenance with LE revascularization?
- AVOID Vasopressors
- Keep warm
-
GA –> balanced anesthetic with opioids, inhalation agent, nitrous oxide, neuromuscular blocker
- Minimal opioids to facilitate extubation
- Do have postop pain
- Deepen anesthetic level during the tunneling phase
- Example: 3-5 mcg/kg fentanyl
- Avoid hemodynamic extremes – short acting β blockers intraop often necessary
- Minimal opioids to facilitate extubation
-
RA –> L1-L4 dermatomes (T10 level adequate)
- Epidural dosing usually - 9-12 ml including test dose
- Remember elderly patients require decreased dosing!
- Epidural dosing usually - 9-12 ml including test dose
Postop managmeent for LE revascularization procedures?
- Control Pain and anxiety
- High risk for MI in this period - stress reduction essential!
- Epidural catheter is beneficial for postop pain control but must consider use of anticoagulants
- Avoid Anemia
- Control HR and BP
- Frequent checks of peripheral pulses (doppler)
- Continuous EKG monitoring + ST analysis
Review of abdominal aorta branches?
What is critical during abdominal aorta surgery?
*Higher clamp → more complications pt will have*
Review and be prepared to discuss branches and levels.
- abdominal branches
- inferior phrenic
- middle suprarenal
- celiac
- first lumbar
- Superior mesenteric artery
- renal
- gonadal
- second lumbar
- inferior mesenteric artery
- third lumbar
- fourth lumbar
Ex: higher clamping in thoracic or abdominal aorta → anticipate more complications
Surgical Procedures Overview
- Surgeon-anesthesia communication critical
- All open procedures have a degree of ischemia-reperfusion
- Reconstruction for aneurysmal
- Reconstruction for aortic dissection
- Endovascular aortic surgery
- ~60-70% of patients requiring infrarenal repair
- Trials ongoing for juxtarenal, suprarenal and thoracoabdominal repair
What is an aneurysm?
Most frequent location of aneurysms?
-
> 50% dilation of normal expected arterial diameter
- abdominal aortic diameter > 3.0 cm
-
Abdominal aorta: most frequent location of arterial aneurysm
- 9x more common than thoracic
-
Statistics:
-
Thoracic:
- ascending (40%)
- descending (35%)
- aortic arch (15%)
-
Thoracic:
-
AAAs: classified as:
- Infrarenal (85%)
- Juxtarenal
- Suprarenal
- Must know level of aneurysm: location of Aox is critical
What is the pathophysiology behind an aneurysma?
- Distinct patho from atherosclerotic disease
-
Degenerative process
- degradation of aortic wall connective tissue
- primarily, the medial and adventitial layers (muscular layer)
- Turbulent BF causes →
- inflammation and immune responses
- biomechanical wall stress
- Size of aneurysm = single most important predictor of subsequent rupture and mortality
What is a anuerysm rupture vs dissection?
AAA Rupture
- Catastrophic
- Many don’t even make it to the OR
- 50% mortality for repair of ruptured AAA
- 85%-90% mortality rate
- Many don’t even make it to the OR
- Goal: balance risk of surgery with risk of rupture
- Current recommendations:
- serial monitoring of known aneurysms
-
Elective Surgical repair indication: (decrease risk of rupture)
- AAAs = > 5.5 cm
- Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm = > 6.5 cm
Aortic Dissection
- Tear in the intimal layer of the arterial wall that creates a false lumen
- propagated by pulsatile blood flow
- Acute = < 14 days
- Chronic = >2 weeks symptom duration
- propagated by pulsatile blood flow
- Approximately ½ of aortic dissections originate from the ascending aorta
-
Ascending Aorta Dissection
- Surgical emergency
-
Leads to:
- acute aortic regurgitation
- pericardial tamponad
- myocardial ischemia
-
Acute descending aortic dissection:
- → end-organ compromise due to malperfusion of the visceral vessels → death
Open abdominal aortic aneurysam repair overview of procedure
- Challenging Intraoperative Management
- Aortic cross clamping
- hemodynamic changes/metabolic changes
- renal impairment
- spinal cord damage
- bowel ischemia
- Unclamping
- hemodynamic changes/metabolic changes
- effect anesthesia management
- Aortic cross clamping
Pic:
- left top and bottom
- clamps are placed across aorta and common iliac arteries
- anerysm is opened
- clot is removed
- inimtal lining is repaired
- right top and bottom
- a graft is sutured between upper and lower ends of aorta
- preserved wall is wrapped around the graft
- the clamps are removed to allow blood flow
What determines the effect of aortic cross clamp?
What are some effects of cross clamping?
Pathophysiology depends on:
- 1. Level & duration of clamp
-
2. Volume status of patient
- 2 most important predictors of outcomes while clamping*
- extent of CAD
- myocardial function
- degree of arterial collateralization (chronic pts w/ collateral flow → do better!)
- anesthetic agents used
- vasodilators used
- body temperature
- neuroendocrine activation
Clamping effects
- Little to no effect on HR
- Effects:
- Catecholamine surge
- ↑ SVR and MAP as a result of the sudden impedance to aortic flow
- Extent depends on cross clamp level applied
- Ex:
- infrarenal cross-clamping → ↑ BP 2%-10%
- Supraceliac clamp → ↑ MAP up to 50%
- Ex:
- ↑ or ↓ in cardiac preload, central filling pressures, and CO → depends on where clamp located
- Catecholamine surge
- BV redistribution occurs proximal to clamp placement
- Lower clamping →
- BV shift into compliant splanchnic vasculature –> all redistributes to gut (wont really see change)
- like a reservoir for majority of autotransfusion
- splanchnic organs hold 25% total BV
- > 800 ml can be autotx to systemic circ in seconds
- like a reservoir for majority of autotransfusion
- Increases in plasma epinephrine & norepinephrine = venoconstriction of splanchnic capacitance vessels – translocates blood to central circulation. Infraceliac cross-clamping is relatively well tolerated compared with supraceliac crossclamping.
- BV shift into compliant splanchnic vasculature –> all redistributes to gut (wont really see change)
-
Supraceliac cross-clamp → don’t have ability to shift BV to splanchnic vasculature (not going to compliant gut) →
- ↑ VR
- ↑ central filling pressures
-
↑ CO
- ↑ myocardial workload – large 90% develop new LV wall motion abnormalities d/t acute ↑ in BV –> HARD on already sick heart (especially those with CAD or decreased EF)
- Lower clamping →
Supraceliac has most significant impact on MAP, PAP and EF
What si the systemic hemodynamic response to aortic crossclamping?
- Passive recoil distal to clamp → ↑ preload
-
↑ Catecholamines (and other vasoconstrictor) →
- Active venoconstriction proximal and distal to clamp →
- leading to ↑ preload
- Active venoconstriction proximal and distal to clamp →
-
↑ Ao flow impedance
-
→ ↑ afterload
-
Overall:
- ↑ Preload
- ↑ Coronary flow
- ↑ Afterload
-
↑ contractility → ↑ CO
- But if no ↑ in coronary flow or contractility → ↓ CO
-
Overall:
-
→ ↑ afterload
- Systemic hemodynamic response to aortic crossclamping (AoX).
- Preload does not necessarily increase.
- Most dramatic and consistent effect →
- ↑ SVR and MAP (result of sudden aortic flow).
What is the blood volume redistribution following aortic cross clamp placement?
- Passive venous recoil distal the aortic cross-clamp →
- Result: shift BV from distal to aortic occlusion to proximal to the occlusion.
- 1. Aorta occluded above celiac axis level → splanchnic reserve redistributed to organs and tissues proximal to the clamp.
-
2. Infraceliac cross-clamp placed →
- BV shift into splanchnic system
- Shift into other organs proximal to clamp
- The ability to shift into or out of the splanchnic vasculature accounts for variability in preload augmentation.
- Result: shift BV from distal to aortic occlusion to proximal to the occlusion.