Varieties of Authoritarian Regimes Flashcards

1
Q

According to Gandhi (minimalistic typology)

How do we classify democracies?

In terms of political systems

A
  1. Parliamentary: The citizens will not directly vote for their chief executive, the prime minister is chosen by the political party and the parliament
  2. Presidential: The citizens of the country vote for the president.
  3. Constitutional monarchy: Hereditary head of state. Difference between the head of state and head of government.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

According to Gandhi (minimalistic typology)

How are authoritarian regimes classified?

A

Authoritarian regimes are usually classified based on the characteristics of their support coalitions:

  1. Monarchies
  2. Military dictatorships
  3. Civilian regimes

We differentiate by looking at who is the head of the state and who their support coalitions are.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

According to Gandhi (minimalistic typology)

How do we identify a monarchy?

And who is the support coalition?

A

Can be identified by looking at the title and hereditary position.

The support coalition:
1) Family: The ability to rely on family is important to maintain power.
2) Kin members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

According to Gandhi (minimalistic typology)

How do we identify military dictatorships?

And who is the support coalition?

A

The military, either led by a single commander or a group of high-ranking officers, has direct control over the government.

The support coalition is the armed forces.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

According to Gandhi (minimalistic typology)

How do we identify civilian dictatorships?

And who is the support coalition?

A

If you are neither a monarchy or military dictatorship, you must be a civilian regime even though you may have some elements in common with the two other.

Support coalition:
1. The political party in Dominant-party dictatorships (e.g. Soviet Union)
2. Personality cults in Personalistic dictatorships (e.g. North Korea)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

According to Gandhi (minimalistic typology)

What are two types of civilian dictatorships?

A
  1. Dominant-party
  2. Personalistic dictatorships

These may shift over time. A country can go from a dominant-party regime to a personalistic dictatorship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

According to Svolik (looks at institutions)

Which two key features does a dictatorship have (or lack)?

Think about in terms of solving conflict

A

1) Lack an independent authority with the power to enforce agreements among key political actors.

2) Violence is the ultimate arbiter of conflicts in authoritarian politics
- This is the only way to settle a conflict.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

According to Svolik (looks at institutions)

Authoritarian regimes can be classified based on which dimensions?

A

It is better to look at the different dimensions, after conceptualizing dictatorship.

Authoritarian regimes can be classified based on conceptual dimensions of authoritarian politics:
1. Military involvement
2. Restrictions on political parties
3. Legislative selection
4. Executive selection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

According to Svolik (looks at institutions)

How we can classify the authoritarian regime based on the dimension of military involvement (none, indirect, corporate and personal) in politics

The four conceptual dimensions of authoritarian politics

A
  1. None = a civilian type of regime
  2. Indirect = the military has removed by force the ruler from the power, but you assign a civilian as a figure head. Still the military makes the decisions.
  3. Corporate = direct involvement of the military. Quite spread, the decisions come from the military in different areas.
  4. Personal = Direct involvement of the military. They still allow civilians to run some parts of institutions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

According to Svolik (looks at institutions)

How we can classify the authoritarian regime based on the dimension of restrictions on political parties

And what does Svolik say specifically about this dimension?

A
  1. Parties banned
  2. Single party
  3. Multiple parties

In Svolik´s view, this dimension crosses through the different typologies of dictatorships. Whether they allow parties or not is the relevant point, not whether it is a monarchy or a civilian dictatorship.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to Svolik (looks at institutions)

How we can classify the authoritarian regime based on the dimension of legislative selection

A

If there is any representation at all.

  1. None
  2. Unelected or appointed legislature
  3. One party
  4. Largest party controls more than 75% of seats
  5. Largest party controls less than 75% of seats
  6. Nonpartisan legislature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

According to Svolik (looks at institutions)

How we can classify the regime based on the dimension of executive selection

A
  1. Unelected
  2. One party or candidate
  3. Selected by a small, unelected body (e.g. Soviet Union)
  4. Elected by more than 75% of the vote
  5. Elected by less than 75% of the vote
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How do Gandhi and Svolik differ in their typologies of authoritarian regimes? Do they criticise each other’s views?

Elaborate.

A

Gandhi’s view is very minimalistic and primarily looks at who is the head of state. Gandhi distinguishes between three types of dictators; monarchs, military rulers and civilian dictators
Distinction of these types is possible through clear observable criteria.

Svolik tries to define dictatorship a bit further than what Gandhi does. Looks more at the institutions and different dimensions, which is important. Which dimension you choose depends on what you want to address.

Svolik is sceptical towards classifying dictatorships into ideal types such as personalist, military and single-party dictatorships. He urges us to look at the different dimensions that we want to measure and then develop appropriate typologies for each one.

He uses three levels of observation: the country, the ruling-coalition level and the leader level.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How should we classify Russia?

What can you say about the Russian political system?

A

Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia has regularly held presidential and legislative elections.

The rules are followed, but
* There are widespread concerns about the lack of free and fair nature of elections.
* International observers have often not been allowed to move and observe elections freely.
* Russia combines electoral competition with some degree of authoritarianism.

Today, Russia is not moving towards democracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some types of hybrid regimes?

Name 4

A
  • Partially democratic regime
  • Tutelary regimes (where elected governments are constrained by non-elected institutions, e.g., the military in Pakistan
  • Semi-competitive democracies where elections are free but a major party is banned.
  • Competitive authoritarianism (a type of hybrid, semi-democratic, subset of civilian dictatorship)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Levitsky and Way

What are the general criteria for a country to be a democracy?

A

1) Free and fair elections
2) Broad protection of civil rights
3) A reasonable level playing field

17
Q

Levitsky and Way

What constitutes free and fair elections? And what are the elections like in FA and CA?

Full Authoritarianism and Competitive Authoritarianism

A

Free: No fraud or voter intimidation
Fair: Opposition parties compete without repression

FA: No multipary elections or non-competitive ones where:
1) Major candidates are formally or informally barred from running regularly;
2) Repression or legal measures prevent opposition parties from running campaigns;
3) Massive fraud

CA: Elections fall somewhere in between this.
1) Major opposition candidates rarely excluded;
2) Opposition parties able to campaign publicly;
3) No massive fraud;
But: elections marred (ruined) by manipulation of voter lists, ballot-box stuffing and/or result falsification.

18
Q

Levitsky and Way

How are civil liberties dealt with in democracies, FA and CA?

A

Democracy: Civil liberties are protected. May be violated on occasion, but not regularly or in way that hinders electoral competition.

FA: the violation of basic civil liberties is very systematic; civic groups, opposition parties and the media are not even minimally protected.

CA: civil liberties are “nominally guaranteed” and at least “partially respected
Independent media, civic & opposition groups operate; they can mostly meet freely

19
Q

Levitsky and Way

When does a lack of reasonably level playing field occur?

How does it look like?

A

1) State institutions are used for partisan end. E.g.: You used the state institutions to support your campaign

2) Incumbents are systematically favoured in an unreasonable matter.

3) Opposition´s ability to organise and compete in elections is seriously handicapped

20
Q

Levitsky and Way

How is a lack of reasonably level playing
field achieved?

A
  1. Access to resources
  2. Access to media
  3. Biased referees (particularly in the judiciary system)
21
Q

Levitsky and Way

How did competitive authoritarian regimes come about?

A

Post-cold war phenomenon.

  • The collapse of the Soviet Union changed the global balance of power, making the West the centre of economic and military power
  • The West largely controlled external assistance like foreign aid.
    Countries wanted to keep the foreign aid, so this created an incentive to mimic a democracy.
  • The West sometimes made elections an explicit requirement for economic assistance, for instance.
  • Full democracy was required for EU membership.
  • International organizations and NGOs committed to promoting human rights & democracy.
22
Q

Schedler

What are Schedler’s requirements for democracy?

“Illiberal democracy is a euphemism for a country that is authoritarian”

A
  1. Empowerment
  2. Free supply
  3. Free demand (people are allowed to form their own preferences)
  4. Inclusion
  5. Insulation (the right to vote without fear of oppression)
  6. Integrity (of the people counting the votes)
  7. Irreversibility (once we have an election outcome, the system can’t change it)
23
Q

Diamond

What is Larry Diamond’s (2002) key argument about hybrid regimes?

Three points

A
  • Most regimes contain a combination of democratic and undemocratic elements.
  • We need to understand the imperfections in both electoral authoritarian systems and democracies.
  • Competitive authoritarian regimes can evolve into democracies, and democracies can become more democratic over time.
24
Q

What do we need to take into account when creating a new typology for regimes?

Three points

A

1) Measuring issues
2) Empirical differences
3) Policy implications