Variations in Eurasia Flashcards
List how European political divisions contributed to its economic development
- Political divisions allowed for competition between different regions (Fouquet and Broadberry, 2015)
- The Glorious Revolution in England (Blaydes and Chaney, 2013)
- The ability of European countries to colonize and exploit resources in the Americas and Asia may have contributed to their wealth. (Voigtländer and Voth, 2013)
- o The rise of secular authority (Greif, 1993, 2000)
List how European political divisions hindered its economic development
- Inhibiting the flow of goods, people, and ideas between regions. (Fouquet and Broadberry, 2015).
- Economic development was driven by tech, no political divisions (Landes 1998, Goldstone 2002)
- Aided by its access to the New World’s resources (Acemoglu et al. 2002)
- Driven by its favourable geographical and climatic conditions (Mokyr and Voth 2001)
How did political divisions in Europe allow for more competition between different regions?
Fouquet and Broadberry (2015)
Each region tried to outperform the others > an example of a “race to the top” > improve their economic policies and institutions in order to attract investment and business.
What’s the significant of localised decision-making as a result of political divisions?
More localized decision-making > facilitated economic development by allowing for more tailored and responsive policies.
Allow for policies that are more closely aligned with the specific needs and circumstances of a region, rather than being dictated by a central authority.
What’s the significant of localised decision-making as a result of political divisions?
More localized decision-making > facilitated economic development by allowing for more tailored and responsive policies.
Allow for policies that are more closely aligned with the specific needs and circumstances of a region, rather than being dictated by a central authority.
How did the Glorious Revolution in England contribute to economic development?
Blaydes and Chaney (2013)
the Glorious Revolution in England resulted in the establishment of growth-friendly, sovereign-constraining institutions, such as respect for property rights and the rule of law, which were key to the emergence of sustained economic development in Europe.
These institutions may have been more likely to emerge in a political system with multiple competing jurisdictions, rather than in a centralised system.
How did the high mortality rate in Europe contribute to its economic growth
(Voigtländer and Voth 2013) > cities which had high mortality rates due to poor sanitation and urban overcrowding, may have contributed to the rise in incomes as they reflected rising per capita incomes
Maddison (2001) argues that Europe experienced rapid growth in per capita incomes after the Black Death of 1350, while Africa and Asia stagnated.
How did the high mortality rate in Europe contribute to its economic growth
(Voigtländer and Voth 2013) > cities which had high mortality rates due to poor sanitation and urban overcrowding, may have contributed to the rise in incomes as they reflected rising per capita incomes
Maddison (2001) argues that Europe experienced rapid growth in per capita incomes after the Black Death of 1350, while Africa and Asia stagnated.
How did inhibiting the flow of goods, people, and ideas between regions hinder economic development
Fouquet and Broadberry (2015)
A “prisoner’s dilemma” where regions are unable to fully cooperate and benefit from trade due to their political differences.
How did political divisions lead to conflict and instability?
Conflict and instability, which could have had negative impacts on economic development.
This could be seen in the numerous wars that have occurred in European history, which have disrupted trade and investment and resulted in the destruction of infrastructure and economic resources.
** May have also hindered the development of common institutions and policies that could have supported economic development across the continent (i.e EU)
(Mokyr and Voth 2001)
Europe’s economic development was driven by its favorable geographic and climatic conditions, which allowed for more productive agriculture and a larger population
(North and Weingast 1989)
Europe’s political and economic institutions, such as property rights and the rule of law, as important factors in its economic growth
Fouquet and Broadberry (2015)
(in favour: divisions contributed to economic development)
Each region tried to outperform the others > an example of a “race to the top” > improve their economic policies and institutions in order to attract investment and business.
more localized decision-making > allows for policies that are more closely aligned with the specific needs and circumstances of a region.
(Blaydes and Chaney, 2013)
The Glorious Revolution in England resulted in the establishment of growth-friendly, sovereign-constraining institutions.
Respect for property rights and the rule of law helped to emerge sustained economic development in Europe.
(Voigtländer and Voth 2013).
- High mortality rate cities had higher per capita incomes
- The ability of European countries to colonize and exploit resources in the Americas and Asia may have contributed to their wealth > Access to resources through colonization
Fouquet and Broadberry (2015)
(Against: divisions hindered economic development)
- Created barriers to trade and hindered economic development by inhibiting the flow of goods, people, and ideas between regions.
- “Prisoner’s dilemma” where regions are unable to fully cooperate and benefit from trade due to political differences.
Pomeranz (2000)
Europe’s growing ability to innovate compared to technological decline in other parts of the world was a key factor in its economic growth.
Acemoglu et al. (2002)
Europe’s economic development was aided by its access to New World resources and the ability to exploit them through colonization
Asia’s lack of development?
Mokyr (1990)
- Political centralisation > lack of competition between regions.
- Rights: lack of strong institutions and property rights.
- Culture: cultural and social factors that discouraged entrepreneurship and innovation.
- Resources: lack of access to natural resources and raw materials.
- Links: lack of access to global markets and trade networks.
Define feudal institutions
- The feudal relationships which evolved served as the foundation for military human resources as the landed nobility of Europe emerged as a “warrior class.”
- Sultans in the Muslim world introduced mamlukism or the use of slave soldiers imported from non-Muslim lands
** long story short, the landed nobility had the power to force kings to agree on property rights, while mamlukism and local elites in the muslim world couldn’t
How did feudal institutions contribute to economic development in Europe?
Blaydes and Chaney (2013)
- Forms of executive constraint that emerged under feudal institutions in Western Europe were associated with increased political stability.
- Feudal institutions contributed to political stability.
- Rulers in Western Europe remained in power longer than their counterparts in the Muslim world.
Rubin (2011)
- The relationship between religious and political authorities plays a significant role in the regulation of interest and can impact economic outcomes.
- ‘Legitimacy relationship’ between religious and political authorities affects regulation of interest.
- Changes in interest laws will be greater in societies with a weaker legitimacy relationship and slower to occur in societies with a strong legitimacy relationship.
Define the ‘Legitimacy relationship’
Rubin (2011)
Changes in interest laws will be greater in societies with a weaker legitimacy relationship and slower to occur in societies with a strong legitimacy relationship.
What was the view of interest rates set in Europe?
- Political and religious authorities in Western Europe relaxed interest restrictions, which contributed to the growth of commerce, after the legitimacy of the Church was undermined (Greif, 2002).