valuation questions and answers (400 + red book) Flashcards
3 major v aluationn methods
- trading comps, precedent transactions, Discounted cash flow
rank 3 valuation methods in terms of value?
Doesnt always follow the rule
1. precedent transaction: due to control premium
2. DCF - can vary depending on assumptions, DCF model can be very prone and sensitive to assumptions put in, often more bullish
3. Comparable companies
when wouldn you not use DCF in valuation?
- unstable or unpredicted cash flows (tech or biotech startup)
- when debt and working capital are used for different role (banks and FIGs dont re-invest debt)
what other valuation methodology
- Liquidation valuation - a company which needs to be liquidated. To value a companies assets and liabilities to see if they sold off assets and paid off liabiloities, how much capital they can return to equity investors
- LBO: how much a PE firm pays for a leverage buyout, to hit the IRR
- sum of parts: for big conglomerates where they value each division separately and add them at the end
- future share price analysis: projecting a company’s share price based on P/E of public comps and discounting it back to present value
most common multiples to use and why
- split into Enterprise based or equity based
- EV/Rev, EV/EBIT, EV/EBITDA = for all capitals, capital neutral (both debt and equity investors), generally higher due to EV being generally bigger than equity value
- P/B, P/E - equity investor only
how do you compare equity/revenue, vs EV/revenue
- used for FIGs with big cash balances, so negative EV, hence can only use equity value/revenue
- generally use EV when possible
- EV/Rev would generally be greater than Equity/Rev bcuz Ev > equity V, unless for FIGs where equity is bigger
why would we never use Equity/EBITDA
- EBITDA includes before interest, which would mean interest is included in EBITDA, and hence applies to debt and equity investors
- Equity Value only applies to equity shareholders, and numerator and denominator dont include the same things, hence no
would EV based multiple generally be larger than equity based
- generally EV based would be larger bcuz EV> equity
- but also depends, cuz sometimes EV is smaller than equity value
how to select comparable companies/precedent transactions
- time
- industry clasficiation
- financial criteria: revenue, EBITDA
- Geography
how do you aply 3 valuation methods to get an actual value
- after getting multiples for comps or precedents, you multiply it with the relevant metric to get EV
- use a football field to illustrate the different methodologies values in 25th and 75th percentile, and produce a range of values
where do you actually use valuations for?
- pitch books during when pitching for a deal
- client presentations
why would 2 companies w similar growths and profitability and similar financials have different comps
- good news/bad news for a specific company
- one company had more bidders/more competitive biddings
- one had intangiblen assets like IP which isnt shown in financials
flaws w public comps
- not always 100% the same
- smaller companies which dont have a lot of traded stocks may not show its fully value
- market is volatile and sensitive to macroeconomic changes
how to take into account a companies competitive advantage in a valuation?
- 75th percentile or higher multiples rather than median
- add in a premium
- use more aggressive projections
Do you ALWAYS use the median multiple of a set of public company comparables or precedent transactions?
- No, it depends on whether if u think company is performing well
- if you dont, u can chose to look at 25th or below