Validity and Reliability of diagnosis Flashcards
Validity:
have we given the correct diagnosis/has the correct illness been diagnosed
Reliability:
If they were diagnosed again would they get the same diagnosis
Concurrent
Two separate test/measures give the same diagnosis i.e. DSM/ICD
Construct
Do the symptoms in the DSM match up with the symptoms of the patient- your symptoms should match those listed for the illness I’ve diagnosed you with
Predictive validity
We can suggest how your illness will progress (and we’re right) and/or I can give you medication for your illness and your symptoms should go away
aetiological
you characteristics match up to what we expect about that illness i.e. genetic history of Sz
Inter-rater
two different doctors give the same diagnosis
Retest
You get the same diagnosis again when rediagnosed (could be on different versions of DSM…or just later on the same version)
Things which effect V&R
- Standardised symptoms in diagnostic manuals e.g. in depression….
- DSM and ICD differences might lead to different diagnoses
- Co-morbidity (diagnosed as one by one and another by a different doctor)
- Updates to the DSM and ICD which might effect what illness you’re diagnosed as (either reliability or construct validity)
- Patients may lie/omit information
- Bias i.e. gender or racial bias
- Cultural bound syndromes
- Cultural differences may impact
AO3- Rosenhan
(Good reliability (all but one) but bad for validity- patient’s lie)—validity point too because the nurses interpreted normal behaviours (bias)
AO3- Kim-Cohen et al. (2005)
children diagnosed with conduct disorder were more likely to describe themselves are having antisocial behaviours than comparison children. Also, during observational assessments these children were more likely to behave disruptively. (Construct & Concurrent)
AO3- Lee (2006)
ADHD in Korea Lee looked for concurrent validity by comparing the DSM-IV-TR criteria with criteria arising from the questionnaire, and compared DSM behavioural and psychological characteristics with those found in an ADHD test.
AO3- Jakobsen et al (2005)
completed a random sample of Danish patients with schizophrenia. An ICD-10 diagnosis showed 93% sensitivity and 87% predictive value when diagnosing schizophrenia
AO3- Kirk and Kutchins (1992)
In a review paper, Kirk and Kutchins argued that methodological problems with studies conducted to test the reliability of the DSM, they argued that there had been insufficient training and supervision of interviewers
AO3- Goldstein (1988)
found that 169 of the 199 patients diagnosed according to DSM-II as having some form of schizophrenia met the DSM-III criteria too, so reliability was seen as good with the DSM. Of the patients assessed by the clinical experts as well, she found high levels of inter-rater reliability.