Validity and Reliability of diagnosis Flashcards

1
Q

Validity:

A

have we given the correct diagnosis/has the correct illness been diagnosed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reliability:

A

If they were diagnosed again would they get the same diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Concurrent

A

Two separate test/measures give the same diagnosis i.e. DSM/ICD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Construct

A

Do the symptoms in the DSM match up with the symptoms of the patient- your symptoms should match those listed for the illness I’ve diagnosed you with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Predictive validity

A

We can suggest how your illness will progress (and we’re right) and/or I can give you medication for your illness and your symptoms should go away

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

aetiological

A

you characteristics match up to what we expect about that illness i.e. genetic history of Sz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Inter-rater

A

two different doctors give the same diagnosis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Retest

A

You get the same diagnosis again when rediagnosed (could be on different versions of DSM…or just later on the same version)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Things which effect V&R

A
  • Standardised symptoms in diagnostic manuals e.g. in depression….
  • DSM and ICD differences might lead to different diagnoses
  • Co-morbidity (diagnosed as one by one and another by a different doctor)
  • Updates to the DSM and ICD which might effect what illness you’re diagnosed as (either reliability or construct validity)
  • Patients may lie/omit information
  • Bias i.e. gender or racial bias
  • Cultural bound syndromes
  • Cultural differences may impact
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

AO3- Rosenhan

A

(Good reliability (all but one) but bad for validity- patient’s lie)—validity point too because the nurses interpreted normal behaviours (bias)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

AO3- Kim-Cohen et al. (2005)

A

children diagnosed with conduct disorder were more likely to describe themselves are having antisocial behaviours than comparison children. Also, during observational assessments these children were more likely to behave disruptively. (Construct & Concurrent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AO3- Lee (2006)

A

ADHD in Korea Lee looked for concurrent validity by comparing the DSM-IV-TR criteria with criteria arising from the questionnaire, and compared DSM behavioural and psychological characteristics with those found in an ADHD test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

AO3- Jakobsen et al (2005)

A

completed a random sample of Danish patients with schizophrenia. An ICD-10 diagnosis showed 93% sensitivity and 87% predictive value when diagnosing schizophrenia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

AO3- Kirk and Kutchins (1992)

A

In a review paper, Kirk and Kutchins argued that methodological problems with studies conducted to test the reliability of the DSM, they argued that there had been insufficient training and supervision of interviewers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

AO3- Goldstein (1988)

A

found that 169 of the 199 patients diagnosed according to DSM-II as having some form of schizophrenia met the DSM-III criteria too, so reliability was seen as good with the DSM. Of the patients assessed by the clinical experts as well, she found high levels of inter-rater reliability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

AO3- Brown et al. (2001)

A

found good-to-excellent reliability for most of the DSM-IV categories (most of the disagreements tended not be on what the symptoms were, but simply if there were enough of them). However, they found some boundary problems with certain disorders, which made it hard to diagnose patients with disorders if they were at boundary level.

17
Q

AO3- Ford & Widiger (1989)

A

men and women with the same symptoms diagnosed with different illnesses (inline with stereotypes)

18
Q

AO3- Ward et al (1962)

A

IRR- 5% of inconsistencies due to patient giving faulty info, inconsistency in interpretation 32.5% and inadequacy of the classification system 62.5%

19
Q

AO3- Beck (1954)

A

The same set of symptoms were only diagnosed as the same disorder in about 50% of cases showing low reliability.

20
Q

AO3- Chandrensa

A

Catatonia seen in some countries more than others i.e. Sri Lanka Vs UK

21
Q

AO3- Sato

A

Japanese doctors less likely to diagnose SZ because its socially sensitive