VALIDITY Flashcards

1
Q

is a judgment or estimate of how well a test measures what it purports to measure in a
particular context

A

validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

the process of gathering
and evaluating evidence about validity

A

validation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • relates more to what a test appears to measure than to what the test actually measures
  • judgment concerning how relevant the test items appear to be
  • presentation or physical appearance of the
    psychological test

Ex: A math test with arithmetic problems has high ___because it looks like it measures math skills.

A

face validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

describes a judgment of how adequately a test samples behavior representative of the universe of behavior that the test was designed to sample

Ex: A physics exam designed to measure overall knowledge of mechanics should include questions about forces, motion, energy, and torque. If it only focuses on motion, it lacks___

A

content validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

– a plan regarding the types of
information to be covered by the items, the number of items tapping each area of coverage,
the organization of the items in the test, and so fort

A

test blueprint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

developed by:
a method of gauging agreement among raters or judges regarding how essential a particular item is (essential, useful but not essential, not necessary)

A

C.H Lawshe
content validity ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

a judgment of how adequately a test score can be used to infer an individual’ s most probable standing on some measure of interest—the measure of interest being the criterion

A

criterion related validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the standard against which a
test or a test score is evaluated

A

criterion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

an index of the degree to which a test score predicts some criterion measure
- Test Future Criterion

Ex: A college entrance exam (like the SAT) is said to have good __if high scores accurately forecast students’ academic performance in college.

A

predictive validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the degree to which an
additional predictor explains something about the criterion measure that is not explained by predictors already in use

Ex: After a general aptitude test predicts job performance, a personality test might be added. If the personality test improves predictions beyond the aptitude test

A

incremental validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

an index of the degree to which a test score is related to some criterion measure obtained at the same time

Ex: A new anxiety scale is compared with a well-known anxiety assessment. If both produce similar results when administered simultaneously

A

concurrent validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

a factor inherent in a test that systematically prevents accurate, impartial measurement; systematic variation

A

test bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. occurs when evaluator rates individuals more favorably than their actual performance
  2. evaluator overly harsh or critical rating individuals below actual performance
  3. evaluator avoid extreme ratings (middle answers)
  4. tendency to let one positive characteristics influence overall evaluations
A

leniency error
severity error
central tendency error
halo error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Extent to which a test is used in an impartial, just and equitable way

A

test fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Compute to know if the items should be used in test, Goal is to RETAIN
- If low aalisin sa test
- if High (Retain)

A

Content validity ratio

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2 accept, 1 revisr =____
2 reject, 1 accept =
2 revise, 1 accept =
1 reject, 1 accept, 1 revise=

A

Accept
Reject
Ask for comment
Ask for comment

17
Q

Research to prove validity of the test

A

Validation studies

18
Q

Gagamit ng international scale and then use in Philippines, translate and study the test to become valid

• Kapag mat babaguhin sa isang Adopted scale uulit sa process ng Test development

A

Local validation studies

19
Q

Weakest form of Validity (because it is nonscientific and no need to compute, only look for APPEARANCE)

A

Face validity

20
Q

Item sa loob ng test (lahat ba ng item is dapat nasa scale)

A

Content validity

21
Q

Table of specifications (base to create a test)

A

Test blueprint

22
Q

Opposite of content irrelevance (hindi na present yung full content) (Ex: Math test, but only measure algebra)

A

Construct underrepresentation

23
Q

To determine if the test can be used to infer the performance of an individual to another criterion/performance

(Ex: Entrance exam on Medschool, if it is high and your performance in Medschool)

A

Criterion related validity

24
Q

Ginagamit sa aptitude test (future reference)
- need to wait for years to correlate

A

Predictive validity

25
Under predictive but may nag emerge na dinaman included sa test (Ex: College entrace test and then you created another test about study habits, you realize na both can predict GPA, the study habits )
Incramental
26
No need to wait, kailangan gawin at the SAME TIME (needs to correlate scores immediately) • Maghanap ng same Test and need to be WELL ESTABLISH
Concurrent
27
"MOTHER OF ALL VALIDITY" - almost the same sa content - pag magkasama ang dalawa ito ang piliin
Construct validity
28
ASSUMPTION FOR CONSTRUCT 1. Lahat ba ng items is about the test na nais i-measure (CRONBACH'S ALPHA and VALIDATION ang ginagamit) 2. Dapat nagbabago 3. Dapat magkaiba ang pretest sa post test 4. Dapat di same sa lahat ng participants
Homogeneity Evidence of changes Evidence of pretest and post test Evidence from distinct groups
29
have to prove na valid ang test using another test (Ex: anxiety test correlate to another anxiety test) • Pwedeng ang test is prrsent at the past (ex.2 years ago) correlate to new test • walang established na criterion
Convergent validity
30
Prove na di sila related (Ex: Depression and motivation scale) If high there is wrong since dapat mababa ang isa dahil di sila same construct
Discriminant evident
31
FACTOR ANALYSIS 1. Determine sub factors (Different sub factors ng mga item sa scale) - Mag GENERATE palang ng sub factors 2. Generated na ang sub factors and will be used to measure the MAIN CONSTRUCT • If nag correlate it is highly correlated
Explanatory Conformatory
32
•. ____ first impression last • ____ recent na nakita (e.g., characteristics) • ___ similarity mula sayo sa iba
Primacy effect Recency effect Similar to me effect