validity✅ Flashcards
definition of validity
- extent of which an observed effect is genuine, does it measure what it was supposed to
whats internal validity?
how can this be affected?
- whether the effects observed in an experiment are due to the manipulation of the IV and not other factors
- if ppts respond to the demands characteristics and act in a way they believe is expected
what is external validity?
relates to factors outside of an investigation such as generalising to other settings or areas
what are the 4 types of validity?
1️⃣ face validity - a measure is scrutisininsed to determine whether it appears to measure what its supposed to measure
2️⃣ concurrent validity - the extent to which a psychological measure relates to an existing and similar measure
3️⃣ ecological validity - extent that findings can be generalised to other settings and situations
4️⃣ temporal validity - research findings from a study can be generalised to other historical times (external validity)
how do you assess face validity?
how do you assess concurrent validity?
- whether a test appears to measure what its supposed to measure. can be passed by an expert
- when the results obtained match other results found by well established tests
what are the 5 ways of improving validity:
1 → experimental research 2→ questionnaires 3→ observations 4→ qualitative 5→ interviews
IMPROVING VALIDITY - EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH:
why are single and double blind studies useful?
why are standardised procedures good?
what do control groups do?
- improves validity and ensures focus is on reliability
- minimises the impact of ppt reactivity and investigator effects
- see if changes in the DV were due to effects of the IV
IMPROVING VALIDITY - QUESTIONAIRES:
what type of questions are m more ideal?
how should data remain?
what scale should be incorporated?
- closed questions more than open
- annomous and reliable
- incorporate a ‘lie scale’ to assess the consistency of responses to control social desirability bias.
IMPROVING VALIDITY - OBSERVATONS:
which type of observation has high ecological validity?
what must categories not do?
covert - as behav. is natural and authentic
- mustn’t overlap, making sure they’re measurable
IMPROVING VALIDITY - QUALITIATIVE:
how does triangulation enhance validity?
does this have higher validity than quantitative methods?
- use of the number of different sources of evidence
- yes
IMPROVING VALIDITY - INTERVIEWS:
what structure should they be?
what can you do with the interviewer to make it more valid?
- structured and free flowing
- use the same interviewer repeatedly