UTILITY Flashcards

1
Q

usefulness of some things or some process.

A

UTILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In the context of psychometrics, it pertains to the usefulness of a test.

A

UTILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Practical value of testing to improve efficiency/training program or intervention.

A

UTILITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SOME FREQUENTLY RAISED UTILITY ISSUES

A

COST EFFICIENCY
SAVINGS IN TIME
COMPARATIVE UTILITY
CLINICAL UTILITY
DIAGNOSTIC UTILITY
PERSONNEL SELECTION

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

FACTORS THAT AFFECT A TEST’S UTILITY

A

PSYCHOMETRIC SOUNDNESS
COSTS
BENEFITS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Higher criterion-related validity of test scores for making a particular decision, the higher the utility of the test is likely to be

A

PSYCHOMETRIC SOUNDNESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

a reliable and valid test is a useful test

A

PSYCHOMETRIC SOUNDNESS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In the context of test utility, it refers to disadvantages, losses, or expenses in both economic and noneconomic terms.

A

COSTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Expenditures associated with testing or not testing.

A

COSTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

refers to profits, gains, or advantages.
Some benefits that can be acquired for using a well-designed testing program

A

BENEFITS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

BENEFITS THAT CAN BE ACQUIRED USING WELL-DESIGNED TESTING PROGRAM

A

An Increased in the quality of the workers’ performance
An increased in the quantity of the workers’ performance
A decrease in the time needed to train workers
A reduction in the number of accidents
A reduction in worker turnover

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

family of techniques that entails a cost-benefit analysis designed to yield information relevant to a decision about the usefulness of a tool assessment

A

UTILITY ANALYSIS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

evaluates whether the benefits of using a test outweigh the costs

A

UTILITY ANALYSIS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

It helps in making decisions regarding whether:
➔ one test is preferable to another test for use for a specific purpose
➔ one tool of assessment is preferable to another tool of assessment for a specific purpose

➔the addition of one or more tests to one or more tests that are already in preferable for purpose
➔ no testing or assessment is preferable to any testing or assessment

A

UTILITY ANALYSIS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

an indication of the likelihood that a testtaker will score within some interval of scores on a criterion measure—an interval that that may be categorized as “passing”, “acceptable”, or “failing”.

A

EXPECTANCY DATA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

WHAT DATA IS USE TO CONDUCT UTILITY ANALYSIS

A

EXPECTANCY DATA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

It provides an estimate of the extent to which inclusion of a particular test in the selection system will improve selection

A

TAYLOR-RUSSEL TABLES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

● It provides an estimate of the percentage of the employees hired by the use of a particular test who will be successful at their jobs, given different combinations of three variables: test’s validity, selection ratio, and base rate.

A

TAYLOR-RUSSEL TABLES

19
Q

number of available positions ÷ total number of applicants

A

SELECTION RATIO

20
Q

used for obtaining the difference between the means of the selected and unselected groups to derive an index of what the test is adding to already established procedures

A

NAYLOR-SHINES TABLE

21
Q

the proportion of people that an assessment tool accurately identifies as possessing or exhibiting a particular trait, ability, behavior, or attribute

22
Q

The proportion of people that an assessment inaccurately identifies

23
Q

● a specific type of miss whereby an assessment tool falsely indicates that the testtaker possesses or exhibits a particular trait, ability, behavior, or attribute

A

FALSE POSITIVE

24
Q

a specific type of miss whereby an assessment tool falsely indicates that the testtaker does not possesses or exhibits a particular trait, ability, behavior, or attribute

A

FALSE NEGATIVE

25
developed by Hubert Brodgen, is a formula for the utility gain resulting from the use of a particular selection instrument under specified conditions
BRODGEN-CRONBACH-GLESER FORMULA
26
refers to an estimate of the benefit of using a particular test or selection method
UTILITY GAIN
27
refers to an estimated increase in work output
PRODUCTIVITY GAIN
28
SOME PRACTICAL CONSIDERATION
THE POOL OF JOB APPLICANTS THE COMPLEXITY OF THE JOB CUT SCORE IN USE
29
There is a limitless supply of potential employees looking for employment
THE POOL OF JOB APPLICANTS
30
Some jobs have require unique skills or demand great sacrifice that there are relatively few people who would even apply, let alone be selected
THE POOL OF JOB APPLICANTS
31
May also vary depending on economic climate
THE POOL OF JOB APPLICANTS
32
Same sorts of approaches to utility analysis are put to work for positions that vary greatly in terms of complexity
COMPLEXITY OF THE JOB
33
reference point derived as a result of a judgement and used to divide a set of data into two or more classifications.
CUTOFF SCORE
34
reference point that is set based on norm-related considerations rather than on the relationship of test scores into a criterion
RELATIVE CUT SCORE
35
a reference point that is typically set with reference to a judgement concerning minimum level of proficiency required to be included in a particular classifications.
FIXED CUT SCORE
36
the use of two or more cut scores with reference to one predictor for the purpose of categorizing testtakers
MULTIPLE CUT SCORE
37
a cut score is in place for each predictor used.
MULTIPLE HURDLE
38
an assumption is made that high scores on one attribute can “balance out” or compensate for low scores on another attribute.
COMPENSATORY MODEL OF SELECTION
39
METHODS OF SETTING CUT SCORES
ANGOFF METHOD IRT- BASED METHODS BOOKMARK METHOD
40
this method for setting fixed cut scores can be applied to personnel selection tasks as well as to questions regarding the presence or absence of a particular trait, attribute, or ability.
ANGOFF METHOD
41
cut scores are typically set based on testtakers’ performance across all the items on the test.
IRT-BASED METHODS
42
cut scores are typically set based on testtakers’ performance across all the items on the test.
IRT-BASED METHODS
43
a standard setting method used to establish one or more cut scores associated with interpretable levels of performance on an assessment
BOOKMARK METHOD