usufruct/ estate massing/ accrual Flashcards

1
Q

what is a usufruct

A

It is a personal servitude and it gives the usufructuary a limited real right to use another’s property and to take the fruits along with an obligation to return the property to the owner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

when does a usufruct occur

A

Occurs when ownership is bequeathed to one person, but the right to use, enjoy and take the fruits of the property is bequeathed to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

under a usufruct a usufructuary is …

A

entitled to the use and enjoyment of another’s property; and
can take the fruits of that property
subject to the obligation to return the property upon the termination of the usufruct to the owner salva rei substantia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

the owner of a property subject to a usufruct is …

A

cannot enjoy the property for the duration of the usufruct; and = they are frequently referred to as the ‘nude’ or ‘bare’ owner or, alternatively, the dominusThe nude owner’s full ownership is restored upon termination of the usufruct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the dominus

A

The dominus owns the property although the ownership does not include the right of enjoyment (it is nudum dominium).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the powers of the dominus

A

Limited. They are not entitled to use and enjoy the fruits of the property before a future date.
Right to use and enjoyment is postponed until a certain future event or an uncertain future event occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when does dies cedit and dies venit take place for the dominus

A

dies cedit takes place on the death of the testator, but dies venit is postponed until the death of the usufructuary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

when do dies cedit and dies venit take place for the usufructuary

A

dies cedit and dies venit occur on the death of the testator. The usufructuary obtains a vested right in the property (although it belongs to the dominus) to use and enjoy its fruits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what happens if the dominus dies before the usufructuary

A

The ownership of the property, subject to the usufruct, will pass to the beneficiaries of the dominus.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Although dies cedit and dies venit occur for the usufructuary on the death of the testator, the vested rights are different from the rights of the dominus…

A

In this case, the vested rights are the right to use and enjoy the property subject to a term (resolutive term or time clause) or condition (resolutive condition). In other words, the rights of the usufructuary in the property resolve when the time has come or the condition has been fulfilled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how is a usufruct different from a fidei commissum

A

Two concepts dominus differ in important respects.
In the case of a fideicommissum = the fiduciary obtains a real right in the fiduciary property, which passes to a fideicommissary when the time comes (resolutive term) or on the occurrence of an uncertain future event (resolutive condition).
In the case of a usufruct= the usufructuary never obtains ownership but only a limited real right (ius in re aliena) which ultimately falls away while the dominus obtains full ownership.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the presumption for fidei commissum/ usufructs

A

NB: In cases of doubt, a presumption operates that the testator intended to create a fideicommissum and not a usufruct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is a joint will

A
  • chose to combine their dispositions in one document – the joint will
  • Both spouses retain full freedom of testation prior to death and each can amend/revoke their portion of the joint will during their lifetimes, even without informing the other testator.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is a mutual will

A
  • H and W make a will in which they declare that ‘the survivor of us will be the sole heir of the first-dying to us’
  • If H dies first, W will be H’s sole heir and vise versa
  • H and W each retain full freedom of testation prior to death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what does the massing of an estate refer to

A

the consolidation of estates or parts of estates
by different testators
into a single economic unit
for purposes of joint disposition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the first stage of massing

A

execution of a mutual will

17
Q

when does massing take effect

A

Massing only takes effect when, upon the death of the first-dying spouse, the surviving spouse elects to accept the benefit of the usufruct over the consolidated share portfolios

18
Q

what is the affect of s 37 of admin act in case of adiation

A
  1. they are bound to the provisions of the mutual will and may not amend or revoke those provisions in the future
  2. dispose of assets acquired after the mutual will came into operation, in other words assets that do not form part of the massed estate
  3. The ultimate beneficiary is entitled to claim from the deceased’s executor any rights in respect of the bequeathed assets of the first-dying testator as well as the surviving testator as they are entitled to in terms of the mutual will
19
Q

what is the affect of s 37 of admin act in case of repudiation

A

the survivor may not receive any other benefit(s) in terms of that will
The surviving testator then retains their own assets and may dispose thereof as they wish
The mutual will becomes the will of the first-dying testator only and regulates only the devolution of the first-dying testator’s assets

20
Q

what is the doctrine of election

A

the choice between adiation and repudiation
in instances of an encumbered benefit,
typically where the testator imposed some obligation or other burden along with a benefit

21
Q

what is a good example of doctrine of election

A

a modus

22
Q

what happens in the case of an encumbered request

A

the rule applies that the beneficiary must take the good with the bad
In other words, the beneficiary cannot accept the benefit without also taking on the obligation or burden
If the beneficiary cannot, for whatever reason, take on the obligation or burden, the beneficiary must repudiate the benefit

23
Q

is the choice for an unencumbered bequest absolute

A

if a beneficiary repudiates one benefit (for example, because an obligation is attached to it), the beneficiary must repudiate all other benefits bequeathed to him/her in that same will

24
Q

when is election particularly important

A

Election is particularly important in the context of the massing of estates

25
Q

what is acccrual

A

the right enjoyed by testamentary beneficiaries.
to share proportionally in a benefit.
that another beneficiary under the same will cannot or will not take.

26
Q

when does accrual operate

A

a co-heir or co-legatee has predeceased,
is disqualified from inheritance,
repudiated the benefit,
or was a beneficiary to a benefit subject to a suspensive condition that was not fulfilled.

27
Q

what determines whether accrual operates or not

A

the testator’s intention:
If a testator made express provision for accrual, or expressly excluded the operation of accrual in their will, the testator’s intention regarding the operation of accrual is readily determinable

28
Q

what happens with direct substitution in accrual

A

Where direct substitution operates (either in terms of the testator’s stipulation in the will or statutorily in terms of s 2C(2) of the Wills Act) in the event of a beneficiary’s predecease, disqualification, repudiation or the non-fulfilment of a suspensive condition,

=accrual shall NOT operate

29
Q

what happens when testator intention not clear for accrual

A

If not clear, can look at certain indications to ascertain the testator’s intention.
Principal amongst these indications to be relied upon is the method of joinder of co-beneficiaries in the will

30
Q

Joinder re tantum (joinder through the thing (asset) alone)

A

present when the same benefit was left to different beneficiaries in different clauses/provisions of the willTherefore, in instances of joinder re tantum, the inference is in favour of accrual

31
Q

Joinder re et verbis (joinder through the thing and words)

A

Present when the same benefit was left to different beneficiaries in the same clause/provision of the will without an express allocation of shares to each beneficiary
Therefore, in instances of joinder re et verbis, the inference is in favour of accrual

32
Q

Joinder verbis tantum (joinder through the words alone)

A

Same property left to different people in same clause with allocation of shares.

Example:
Clause 1 : I leave my house to Adam and Ben in equal shares.
Presumption against accrual unless contrary intention in the will.

BUT criticised in case law and legal literature.
Lello v Dales AD: verbis tantaum does not automatically lead to a presumption against accrual. In such cases emphasis should be placed on testator’s probable intention.