Pacta Successoria + donatis mortis causa Flashcards
what is pactum successorium
A contract in which the parties attempt to regulate the devolution of the entire or part of the assets of one or both parties.
(generally invalid)
what is the origin of the prohibition of pactum success.
- common law
- not permitted in roman law
what is the only real objection to pactum succ.
In order to give effect to freedom of testation, a will is to be revocable until death. Pactum successorium may restrict freedom of testation and therefore considered contra bones mores.
what are the two forms of pactum that are considered invalid
- Parties attempt to arrange the inheritance of the assets in the contract itself [We, A and B agree whoever outlives the other will be the sole heir]
- Parties agree that one of them will include certain provisions in their will [We, A and B agree the A will appoint B as his only heir}
what are the two forms of pactum that are valid
- Donatio mortis causa
2. Testamentary provisions on an antenuptial agreement
what are the 5 tests to determine pactum successorium
- Absence of counter performance.
- Revocability test.
- Restriction of freedom of testation.
- Vesting test.
- Intention test.
explain the absence of counter performance test
Schauer v Schauer found that an agreement is an invalid PS unless proof can be provided that a counter performance has been given to the promisor
• generally accepted that giving counter performance is NOT the criterion to establish whether or not an agreement is a PS
explain the revocability test
- If the contract = revocable, you can revoke and change your mind about the disposition at any time. Your FOT is not limited and the contract is not considered a PS
- If it is an irrevocable agreement then it restricts FOT and is regarded as a PS
- However, revocability is not determinative, just one factor to consider
explain restriction of freedom of testation test
- General rule: any agreement that restricts freedom of testation is null and void
- Courts have held that a contract in terms of which a testator is not allowed to dispose of their property in a will is also a restriction on such a person’s freedom of testation and is thus invalid
explain vesting test
- If the right vests in the beneficiary immediately or before the giver’s death, even if use and enjoyment is postponed until after the death, the disposal is inter vivos [during the life of the deceased] and the contract is not an invalid PS.
- BUT, if the rights vest at the time of or after the death of the giver then the disposal is mortis causa and the contract is an invalid pactum
what is the Mcalpine (majority) vesting test
- whether promise makes the right thereto to vest in the promiseeonly upon or after the death of the promissor (which points to apactum successorium)
- whether vesting takes place prior to the death of the promissor, for instance, at the date of the transaction giving rise to the promise (in which case it cannot be apactum successorium).”
explain the intentions of the party ( Mcalpine minority)
- intention not right vesting = dominant feature
- Intention is a factual question and different considerations can be taken into account, including the revocability of the agreement and the vesting of rights
what did the majority in mcalpine hold
Court held right to shares conditional upon survivorship and vesting postponed until death of 1st dying. Therefore, invalid pactum successorium.
can pension schemes / partnership agreements/ life insurance policies pactum successorium?
Cannot be considered pactum successorium.
Concluded without animus testandi and can therefore not be regarded as invalid pactum successorium.
explain donatio mortis causa
A donation aimed at the death of the donor and must comply with the formalities laid down in the will.
Although the DMC deals with the transfer of property from one person to another, it is a contract.
There is an offer from the donor which is accepted by the other.