US 11: The US and the world Flashcards
Why were there changes in US foreign and imperial policies in 1890-1914?
- Accidental Empire
- Progressive Imperialism
- Need for Markets
- End of West Expansionism
- Preclusive Imperialism
Explain ‘accidental empire’ as a reason why foreign and imperial policies changed.
historians such as Harold Evans 1998 argue that the US didn’t seek an empire and the decision to annex the Philippines was due to the deciding vote of Vice-President Hobart. It didn’t need an empire for economic reasons (huge trade with Britain)
Explain ‘progressive imperialism’ as a reason why foreign and imperial policies changed.
- The term was coined first by McDougall in 1997 - US imperialism was motivated by a desire to improve the lives of the non-Americans e.g. removal of yellow fever in Cuba export of American values to less developed countries ⇒ in reality it wanted to dominate and expand their sphere of influence (linked to missionary work)
- Sentiment of the monroe doctrine (WASPS were ‘better than others and it was their role to spread Christianity’)
Explain ‘need for markets’ as a reason why foreign and imperial policies changed.
- In the 1950s, William A. Williams said the primary motive for a shift in foreign policy was the need for new markets and economic growth - met by an ‘open door’ policy.
- Niall Ferguson in 2003 said another economic motive could be the 1893 Depression, the USA ended up being faced with a surplus in farm produce
Explain ‘end of western expansionism’ as a reason why foreign and imperial policies changed.
Argument that the end of westward expansion meant that the US could turn its head to the rest of the world
Explain ‘preclusive imperialism’ as a reason why foreign and imperial policies changed.
- term was first used by William Langer and it refers to the idea of taking colonies before other countries did so first.
- The US wanted to copy the European powers’ attempts to create their empires in Africa and Asia → so they took Latin America
What was the argument between expansionists and isolationists?
Expansionists like Roosevelt, Mahan, Sen. Lodge believed in ‘forward’ foreign policy underpinned by modern sea power. → Driven by a ‘civilising mission’ to raise up non-whites
Isolationists like Bryan (pacifist and religious moralist) led American Anti-Imperialism League 1898 along with Cleveland (ex-pres.), Carnegie (steel robber baron) and Samuel Gompers (TU leader)
Why did the USA become involved in war with Spain 1898?
A major turning point for American foreign and imperial policy was their expansion into Latin America and the Pacific. Their war with Spain symbolised this.
US involvement in the Pacific: Samoa
- PRECLUSIVE imperalism
- 1972 King of Samoa offered the US the naval base Pago Pago on the eastern Island of Tutuila = it was refused but the US became aware of British/German interest in the area (German trading in Samoa became important trading post)
- Samoan Civil war = USxBritain supported one side whilst Germany supported the other -> abolisged monarchy leading the US establishing protectorate in East whilst Germany had colony in West
US involvement in the Pacific: Hawaii
- 1898 Hawaii was annexed, it was an important stopping station for US missionaries on way to Japan/China
- Hawaii became increasingly dependent on US economy because of sugar imports by US
- 1887 USA established first major pacific naval base at Pearl Harbour in Hawaii
- 1890 McKinley Tariff removed taxes on raw sugar -> lost trading advantage
- 1891, new Cuban queen led a rebellion -> marines intervened + surrendered in 3 days = USA planned to annex hawaii (people feared them becoming an imperial power)
US involvement in the Pacific: The Philippines
- Treaty of Paris 1898 (which ended Spanish-American war) = US could by Philippines Islands from Spain for $20 million
1. Many thought Americans would ‘civilise’ people by converting them to Christianity
2. Preclusive imperialism = fear that Philippines would be taken over by Britain, Germany or Japan
3. Despite wanting independence, could not be returned to Spain or Filipinos = ineffective
4. Gained support from nationalists like Emilio Aguinaldo by promising independence → didn’t happen = Revolt in 1899 (suppressed in 1902 with military)
McKinley protested that the US was motivated not by greed but a ‘civilising mission’ but Cuba and Philippines were manipulated to gain popular support
The Anti-Imperialist League attacked the government for betraying the traditions of the founding fathers after the conquest of the Philippines (violence, paternalism, racial prejudice against ‘little brown brothers’)
US involvement in Latin America: Cuba
- Cuba
- After Spanish defeat, debate started about what to do = given independence or become a colony/protectorate
- April 1898 Congress passed Teller Amendment which stated US wouldn’t annex it
- Still there was belief that Cuba couldn’t rule itself + independence might threaten commercial interests
- This led to 1901 Platt Amendment (gave US control of Cuban financial and commercial affairs)
- Final treaty with Cuba signed in 1903 which imposed new political system and made economy heavily dependent on USA e.g. Cuban sugar, tobacco tied to US through preferential tariffs + US goods entered Cuba at varying rates
- US forces withdrew in 1902 but went back in 1906-1909 because of unrest about presidential election
- USA invaded again in 1912 with marines to help gov. put down revolt of slaves
1901, Platt Amendment authorised intervention in Cuba → incorporated into Cuban-American Treaty 1903
US in Latin America: Puerto Rico, Venezuela
- Although no intention to annex Latin America, wanted to extend influence for trade and political purposes
- US business interests sought to exploit ^ and increase living standard
Puerto Rico:
- Island was a Spanish colony, had slight independence before the war -> invaded in 1898 then under was to be administeredOrganic Act 1900
Venezuela:
- 1895 Britain and Venezuela in dispute about border with colony = Pres. Cleveland demanded that British send dispute to arbitration, rejected by PM Salisbury but then threatened by US to send 54 vessels (Venezuela won)
US in Latin America: Panama Canal
- Panama Canal1900, McKinley was re-elected, assassinated in 1901, replaced by RooseveltPanama Canal was one of his greatest achievements - vital for expansion of American sea power, trade and strategic interests
- USA had long supported building of a canal to connect Atlantic and Pacific Oceans
- US SoS William Seward in 1860s began negotiations with Colombia but stopped by senate
- 1881 French company who had built the Suez Canal in Egypt started to build Panama canal but suffered financial issues so American company (New Panama Canal Company) took rights
- Colombia demanded $15 million from US gov. and $10 million from company to build = Roosevelt refused to pay
- 1903 Panamanians staged national revolt for independence from rule of Colombia + supported by USA = achieved independence and accepted US offer of $10 million for strip of land
- Completed in 1914
US in Latin America: Nicaragua
- Nicaragua
- Important because of close proximity to possible canal site and high level of economic investment
- Interests threatened by anti-American president Jose Santos Zelaya (1909 cancelled economic privileges granted to US about mining concerns)
- Taft sent in marines to install pro-American pres. Who extended American influence by providing huge loans = USA controlled national bank
- In 3 years Diaz’s position was threatened to USA sent in 3000 troops = set up protectorate
US in Latin America: Dominican Republic
- Dominican Republican
- Example of USA using its ‘police power’
- 1903 Republic defaulted on repayment of American loans worth $40 million
- Roosevelt reluctant to invade -> 1904 took control of customs rev. + used to pay off debt = ‘Big Stick Policy’
US in the Far East: China
- Unlike other ‘great powers’ didn’t want to expand into China
- US SoS John Hay realised Americans would oppose acquisition of territory so 1899 introduced ‘Open Door Policy’ (first note asking states to respect each other’s trading rights in China)
- 1900 uprising called ‘Boxer Rebellion’ against foreigners broke out in China because of instability caused by the decline of imperial rule → was going to be partitioned between European powers → threat to US interests so the sent troops to assist whilst SoS John Hay announced extension of policy asserting principle of equal and impartial trade in all parts of China not just spheres of interest + asserted that US gov. would protect the lives and property of US citizens in China
US in the Far East: Japan
- Relations tense at turn of century
- Fear of Japanese modernisation → heightened by seeing their naval efficiency in the Russo-Japanese war
- Japanese immigration into Hawaii and USA but 1900 legislation stopped this = racism upset Japanese along with annexation of Philippines
- USA felt threatened by Japanese navy and ambitions in China
- Threats increased when Japan won Russo-Japanese War1904-5. Roosevelt helped negotiate end of war with Treaty of New Hampshire where Japan was given a free hand in Korea -> Japan blamed him for not forcing Russia to pay ‘war indemnity’
- Roosevelt concerned about Japanese imperialism = 1908 Root-Takahira Agreement signed for better relations => agreed to respect each other’s interests in China and maintain situation in Pacific
- Open Door policy confirmed for USA (without consulting Korea), Japan’s ‘right’ to annex Korea