Untitled Deck Flashcards

1
Q

What was the main strength related to the experimental setting?

A

The experiment took place in a controlled lab environment, increasing internal validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is using a standardised lab environment a strength?

A

It ensures that all participants had similar experiences, reducing variability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How was the dependent variable clearly operationalised?

A

The dependent variable was whether participants correctly identified or rejected faces in a line-up.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Why is having a clearly operationalised DV important?

A

It allows for precise measurement and easier analysis of results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kind of data did Pozzulo et al. collect?

A

Quantitative data, which made analysis straightforward and objective.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is quantitative data considered a strength?

A

It allows for statistical analysis and reduces subjectivity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What steps did researchers take to control demand characteristics?

A

Instructions and lab conditions were consistent to minimise participants’ expectations or biases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why is controlling demand characteristics a strength?

A

It reduces the chance that participants’ responses were influenced by cues in the experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How did the study demonstrate ethical practices with children?

A

Researchers obtained consent from guardians and emphasised the right to withdraw without penalty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why was obtaining consent and ensuring no harm important in this study?

A

It ensured ethical standards were maintained, especially when working with young children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What methods were used to make children comfortable during the study?

A

Experimenters engaged in crafts with children before testing and wore friendly, professional-casual clothes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Why did the experimenters wear professional-casual clothes?

A

Overly formal attire could create social pressure, affecting children’s responses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was a key ethical strength of the study?

A

It was child-friendly, with attention to comfort, consent, and the right to withdraw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was a major weakness regarding ecological validity?

A

The lab setting does not accurately replicate real-world conditions for eyewitness testimony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why might ecological validity be important in eyewitness studies?

A

In real cases, witnesses experience emotional stress, which wasn’t present in this experiment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was a potential weakness related to emotional involvement?

A

Participants were not emotionally involved as they would be in a real crime scenario, affecting results.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Why is the lack of emotional involvement a limitation?

A

Emotional factors in real crimes can impact memory and decision-making.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is an ethical concern in Pozzulo et al.’s study?

A

Some participants were deceived about the true purpose of the experiment.

19
Q

Why is deception considered an ethical weakness?

A

Deception can harm participants’ trust and raises ethical concerns, especially in sensitive studies.

20
Q

What was the research design for comparing adults and children?

A

An independent measures design was used for this comparison.

21
Q

What was the design used to compare line-up types?

A

A repeated measures design was used to compare identification and rejection line-ups.

22
Q

Why is using an independent measures design beneficial in this study?

A

It reduces carry-over effects between age groups, as each age group only participates in one condition.

23
Q

What was the purpose of using a repeated measures design for line-up type?

A

It allowed each participant to experience both target-present and target-absent line-ups.

24
Q

What materials were used to present line-up targets?

A

Videos and photoarrays of cartoon and human faces.

25
What did the researchers show in each video clip for human targets?
Each video was a short clip of a person performing an everyday task, showing 2-3 seconds of their face.
26
How were the human foils selected?
Four foils were chosen based on similar facial features, hair length, and color.
27
Why were cartoon characters used in some line-ups?
Cartoons were familiar to children and easier to identify, reducing cognitive load.
28
What were participants asked after each video?
They were asked a free-recall question about the character's appearance as a filler task.
29
What was the purpose of the filler question?
To reduce focus on the upcoming line-up task and mimic more natural recall.
30
How did children provide their responses during line-ups?
Children pointed to their chosen image in the line-up, recorded by the experimenter.
31
How did adult participants record their responses?
Adults indicated their choice on a response sheet.
32
What was the primary dependent variable (DV)?
Whether the participant identified the correct face or the blank silhouette.
33
How were line-up photos standardised?
All photos were cropped to include only the face and neck area to avoid clothing cues.
34
What was the purpose of including a blank silhouette in line-ups?
To give participants an option to indicate that the target was absent.
35
What was the sample size for children?
59 children aged 4-7 years old.
36
What was the sample size for adults?
53 adults aged 17-30 years old.
37
Where were the child participants recruited from?
They were recruited from pre-kindergarten and kindergarten classes in Eastern Ontario, Canada.
38
Where were the adult participants recruited from?
From the Introductory Psychology Participant Pool at Eastern Ontario University.
39
What was a strength of using both children and adults as participants?
It allowed for age-related comparisons in decision-making accuracy.
40
Why did researchers counterbalance the order of video and line-up presentations?
To minimise order effects and ensure balanced exposure to conditions.
41
What were some limitations of using cartoon characters in the experiment?
Cartoons do not replicate real-life human targets, which may impact generalisability.
42
Why might cartoon targets limit the study's generalisability?
Cartoons are less complex than real faces, potentially simplifying children’s identification task.
43
How did the study minimise social pressure on children during testing?
Experimenters dressed in professional-casual attire to appear approachable rather than authoritative.
44
Why is high internal validity considered a strength in this study?
It indicates that results are more likely due to experimental conditions rather than external factors.