universal jurisdiction Flashcards
Universal Jurisdiction
certain crimes can be prosecuted from anywhere in the world because they are crimes against the human community. As a a result, certain violations of human rights can be investigated and tried regardless of states sovereignty and international borders
ICJ prosecutes who
- Countries
- UN
what is the ICC
In 2002 the International Criminal Court (ICC) was established to ensure that a permanent court of justice existed to remain vigilant over violations of human rights.
Can only prosecute crimes occurring since 2002
Unlike ICJ, ICC prosecutes only individuals, not states
Is a court of “last resort” – wants states to enforce 1st
ICC strengths and weaknesses
Strengths:
1. Attempts to provide consistent enforcement (tries to eliminate ad hoc tribunals)
2. Provides the basis for external intervention when internal remedies are unavailable
3. Tries to deter future atrocities
Weaknesses:
1. US, China, Russia, India are not members
2. Threatens intrusion into the affairs of sovereign states, even for non-member countries.
3. Too slow/too ineffective
4. Possible biases
ad hoc tribunals
The practice of protecting and enforcing human rights at the international level
ICC and ngos
NGOs such as Human Rights Watch help est. the ICC as a permanent body to focus on (a) the prosecution of genocide, (b) crimes against humanity, and (c) war crimes.
- provide support for victims & witnesses in giving evidence
- govts with writing reports, translating services, etc
Regional level
IACHR (INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS)
* Permanent body: Meets several times a year to examine human rights violations in the hemisphere
* Its human rights duties comes from 3 documents
- Individuals can lodge a complaint against member states of the IACHR
- Enforcement, Court can require monetary and non-monetary reparations for damages done
National Level
- states enforce their own human rights laws through local and national court systems.
- The issue with national courts, however, is that not all states have a fair, independent, or transparent court system.
- The practice of human rights at the national level is very uneven and inconsistent because states have different legal systems and have different human rights laws
- Supreme courts do not investigate human rights violations independently.
- Instead, a concerned party (e.g. the person whose rights were violated, an NGO) must bring the case to court in a lawsuit that argues a particular right under the constitution was violated.