Unit 4: Singapore's Separation from Malaysia Flashcards
Main Topics
- Economic Disagreements – a question of priorities
- Disagreement over formation of Common Market & removal of tariffs
- Common Market supposed to be set up for long-term economic survival but there was a delay in setting up the common market
- Tariffs supposed to be removed on sg goods but it was continued to be imposed to protect MY’s industries - Disagreement over Singapore’s contribution to the federal government
- Federal government increased Singapore’s contribution from 40% to 60% as defence spending had risen significantly due to Konfrontasi
- SGs population only numbered 17% of entire federation, and yet she needs to contribute 60% of revenue to the federation, hence SG felt that it was unfair - Political Differences
- Communalism (UMNO) vs Non-Communalism (Multiracial; PAP)
- PAP: Non-Communal approach based on an idea of multiracialism, believed in equal treatment of all races and aimed to represent the interests of all racial communities
- UMNO: Communal approach based on racial lines, believed in special rights and privileges of Malays. sought to protect Malay interests and believed that political parties should protect the interests of their respective ethnic communities - Emergence and Escalation of Political Rivalry between Alliance Party (UMNO-MCA-MIC & PAP)
- Formation of Alliance Party (UMNO-MCA-MIC) during Malaysian elections
- Formation of Singapore Alliance – SG branch of UMNO, MCA and MIC during 1963 Singapore Elections
- This was so that they could capture more seats & retrain dominance in politics - 1963 State Elections
- Singapore Alliance: A political party made up of SG branch of UMNO-MCA-MIC
- Singapore Alliance contested in the State Election to try to reduce the no. of seats PAP would win to make sure that PAP would never dominate the federal government – did not win & lost all 7 seats previously held by SPA
- Meant that UMNO’s pro-Malay policy had no appeal among Singapore Malay residents = felt threatened and challenged
- Alliance Party vowed to re-organise Singapore Alliance to defeat PAP in next election = start of political rivalry, increased tensions - 1964 Federal Elections
- PAP won 1 seat = increased no. of seats in federal government from 12 to 13 – became leading opposition party in the federal govt = deepened UMNO’s view of PAP as a political rival + LKY announced that PAP would remain a loyal opposition party to create a non-communal society with equal treatment for all races (opposite Alliance Party’s ideals – worsened tensions)
- Extremists in UMNO started an anti-PAP campaign using media, spread rumours to Malays to spoil PAP’s reputation = created more tensions & problems b/w PAP & Alliance Party - 1964 Race Riots (21 July 1964)
- The Alliance Party’s anti-PAP campaign created tension and anger between the Chinese and Malays in Singapore - tension turned into violence during the celebration of Prophet Muhammad’s birthday in July 1964 (clash between Chinese policemen and Malay participants – turned into full-blown riots)
- Caused PAP and UMNO to declare a political truce
- agreed to set aside their differences and worked together to rebuild Singapore’s social fabric and re-integrate the 2 communities affected by the riots
- determined not to let Malaysia fall apart because of the riots (caused separation on 9 Aug 1965)
- Economic Disagreements – a question of priorities - summary (2pt, 3subpt, 1sspt)
- Economic Disagreements – a question of priorities
- Disagreement over formation of Common Market & removal of tariffs
- Common Market supposed to be set up for long-term economic survival but there was a delay in setting up the common market
- Tariffs supposed to be removed on sg goods but it was continued to be imposed to protect MY’s industries - Disagreement over Singapore’s contribution to the federal government
- Federal government increased Singapore’s contribution from 40% to 60% as defence spending had risen significantly due to Konfrontasi
- SGs population only numbered 17% of entire federation, and yet she needs to contribute 60% of revenue to the federation, hence SG felt that it was unfair
- Political Differences - summary
2pt, 4 subpt (2 2)
- Political Differences
- Communalism (UMNO) vs Non-Communalism (Multiracial; PAP)
- PAP: Non-Communal approach based on an idea of multiracialism, believed in equal treatment of all races and aimed to represent the interests of all racial communities
- UMNO: Communal approach based on racial lines, believed in special rights and privileges of Malays. sought to protect Malay interests and believed that political parties should protect the interests of their respective ethnic communities - Emergence and Escalation of Political Rivalry between Alliance Party (UMNO-MCA-MIC & PAP)
- Formation of Alliance Party (UMNO-MCA-MIC) during Malaysian elections
- Formation of Singapore Alliance – SG branch of UMNO, MCA and MIC during 1963 Singapore Elections
- This was so that they could capture more seats & retrain dominance in politics
- 1963 State Elections summary (2pt, 2subpt)
- 1963 State Elections
- Singapore Alliance: A political party made up of SG branch of UMNO-MCA-MIC
- Singapore Alliance contested in the State Election to try to reduce the no. of seats PAP would win to make sure that PAP would never dominate the federal government – did not win & lost all 7 seats previously held by SPA
- Meant that UMNO’s pro-Malay policy had no appeal among Singapore Malay residents = felt threatened and challenged
- Alliance Party vowed to re-organise Singapore Alliance to defeat PAP in next election = start of political rivalry, increased tensions
- 1964 Federal Elections summary - 1pt, 1subpt
- PAP won 1 seat = increased no. of seats in federal government from 12 to 13 – became leading opposition party in the federal govt = deepened UMNO’s view of PAP as a political rival + LKY announced that PAP would remain a loyal opposition party to create a non-communal society with equal treatment for all races (opposite Alliance Party’s ideals – worsened tensions)
- Extremists in UMNO started an anti-PAP campaign using media, spread rumours to Malays to spoil PAP’s reputation = created more tensions & problems b/w PAP & Alliance Party
- 1964 Race Riots (21 July 1964) summary - 1pt, 1subpt, 2sspt
- 1964 Race Riots (21 July 1964)
- The Alliance Party’s anti-PAP campaign created tension and anger between the Chinese and Malays in Singapore - tension turned into violence during the celebration of Prophet Muhammad’s birthday in July 1964 (clash between Chinese policemen and Malay participants – turned into full-blown riots)
- Caused PAP and UMNO to declare a political truce
- agreed to set aside their differences and worked together to rebuild Singapore’s social fabric and re-integrate the 2 communities affected by the riots
- determined not to let Malaysia fall apart because of the riots (caused separation on 9 Aug 1965)
- Economic Reasons for Separation
i. Disagreement over formation of the common market
2pt
- A question of priorities - the one in the position to command was Malaya - now does not place priority on SG’s concerns (e.g. SG tried to place priority on removing tariffs - but it wasn’t mutually beneficial for MY - MY didnt not place priority on it)
- conflict rose from the tensions that came from the terms agreed on – the 2 key terms was that there would be a common market set up & the removal of tariffs (both did not happen)
- Economic Reasons for Separation
ii. Disagreement over Singapore’s contribution to the Federal Government
2pt, 3subpt
ii. Disagreement over Singapore’s contribution to the Federal Government
* Based on the terms of the Malaysia Agreement – Singapore would contribute 40% of its revenue to the federal government
- Federal government increased Singapore’s contribution of its revenue from 40% to 60%
- Singapore felt that this was an unfair decision since its original contribution was already a larger proportion of her revenue
- (SGs population only numbered 17% of entire federation, and yet she needs to contribute 60% of revenue to the federation, hence Singapore felt that it was unfair)
* Singapore was seen as an economic rival (for Malaya)
- Economic Reasons for Separation
Summary
Issue
What Singapore expected as Part of the Merger
What the Federal Government Decided
Common Market
* Common market set up for its long-term economic survival
* tariffs of Singapore-made goods would be removed
- There was a delay in setting up the common market
- tariffs continued to be imposed on Singapore-made goods to protect Malaya’s industries
- meant Singapore products became more expensive and could not compete with the locally made goods in the federation
Revenue Contribution
* Singapore would contribute 40% of its revenue to the federal government
- Federal government increased Singapore’s contribution to 60% as defence spending had risen significantly due to Konfrontasi
- Singapore felt that the decision was unfair and that its original contribution was sufficient. (bc SGs population only numbered 17% of entire federation, and yet she needs to contribute 60% of revenue to the federation)
- Political Reasons for Separation
Communalism vs Multiracialism (Non-Communalism)
5pt, 4subpt (2 2), 1sspt
- The basis of the political conflict between Singapore and the Federal Government was the conflicting political approaches adopted by the ruling parties of these countries that caused each to view the other as a political rival. (UMNO – Communal-based approach, PAP – Non-Communal based approach)
- Tensions arose from the conflicting political approaches adopted by the ruling parties of the federation, UMNO and PAP (main opposition party).
- Singapore’s leading party, the PAP’s political approach: characterised by non-communal ideals based on an idea of multiracialism
- believed in equal treatment of all races (racial equality)
- aimed to represent the interests of all racial communities
- Malaya’s leading political party, UMNO’s political approach: characterised by communal ideals based on racial lines
- believed in special rights and privileges for Malays
- It was a distinctively pro-Malay organisation and sanctioned the policy of how Malays were to be given special privileges and rights.
- sought to protect Malay interests and believed that political parties should protect the interests of their respective ethnic communities
- While the contrasting political approaches did not, in themselves, mean that there would be conflict between the two political parties, the fact that each of them (ie UMNO and the PAP) sought to compete against each other (for their own reasons) in state and federal elections was what created the rising tensions as each began to view the other as political rivals.
- Political Reasons for Separation
What was PAP’s political approach?
1pt, 2subpt
- Singapore’s leading party, the PAP’s political approach: characterised by non-communal ideals based on an idea of multiracialism
- believed in equal treatment of all races (racial equality)
- aimed to represent the interests of all racial communities
- Political Reasons for Separation
What was UMNO’S political approach?
1pt, 2subpt, 1sspt
- Malaya’s leading political party, UMNO’s political approach: characterised by communal ideals based on racial lines
- believed in special rights and privileges for Malays
- It was a distinctively pro-Malay organisation and sanctioned the policy of how Malays were to be given special privileges and rights.
- sought to protect Malay interests and believed that political parties should protect the interests of their respective ethnic communities
- Political Reasons for Separation
Emergence and Escalation of Political rivalry between Alliance Party (UMNO-MCA-MIC) and PAP
3pt, 2subpt
- The rising tensions & conflict can be seen from the 1963 Singapore Elections, 1964 Federal Election and the Malaysian Solidarity Convention.
- This communal approach reflected in the formation of the Alliance Party formed along racial lines:
- UMNO (United Malays National Organisation), MCA (Malayan Chinese Association), MIC (Malayan Indian Congress)
- Formation of Alliance Party (UMNO-MCA-MIC) during Malaysian elections
- Formation of Singapore Alliance – SG branch of UMNO, MCA and MIC during 1963 Singapore Elections
- This was so that they could capture more seats & retrain dominance in politics
- NOTE: SAP (Singapore Alliance Party) is NOT Singapore People’s Alliance (SPA)
- Political Reasons for Separation
Emergence and Escalation of Political rivalry between Alliance Party (UMNO-MCA-MIC) and PAP
Summary Table
Issue
Singapore (PAP)
Federal Government of Malaysia
Political Approach
* Non-communal approach based on multiracialism
- believed in racial equality and sought to represent the interests of all racial communities
- Communal approach based on racial lines
- recognising that certain races (the Malays) have special rights and privileges – believed that political parties should protect the interests of their respective ethnic communities
Composition of Political Parties
* Singapore’s major political parties, such as the governing PAP, were multiracial and sought to represent the interest of all communities.
- The federal government was formed by the Alliance Party, which comprised three communal (race-based) parties: the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO), Malayan Chinese Association (MCA), and Malayan Indian Congress (MIC).
- These parties sought to look after the interests of their respective ethnic communities.
Treatment of Races
* Singapore’s Government felt that everyone, regardless of race, should be given an equal opportunity to succeed.
- It believed that the best way of enabling Malays to gain better employment opportunities was by providing free education.
- Employment, business and education were given to the Malays with the aim of improving their economic and social position.
- For instance, a certain number of jobs in the government were reserved for Malays.
- 1963 Singapore State Elections
Backgrond + Motivation
4pt, 1subpt + chain reaction
- 21 September 1963
- Singapore Alliance: A political party made up of SG branch of UMNO-MCA-MIC
- Singapore Alliance decided to challenge PAP in the Singapore Election of 1963.
Aim: to win seats in the Singapore Legislative Assembly - they came to contest in the Singapore state election to try to reduce the number of seats PAP would win - tunku was just happy if it was less – wanted to make sure that PAP would never dominate the government
- tunku was afraid that sg would uphold a political approach in complete divergent to Malaysia - did not want to sustain such a party in federal govt
- If the Singapore Alliance wins seats in Singapore’s state election,
= less seats for PAP in state parliament
= less seats for PAP in federal parliament
= more seats for Malay representatives (from UMNO-MCA-MIC) in federal govt
= more dominance in politics
-> consequence: started tension b/w PAP and federal govt