Unit 3 - Social Challenges Flashcards

1
Q

Three Methods of Social Change

A
  1. Behaviour Modification
  2. Social Cognitive Theory
  3. Social Persuasion Theory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Part One: Behaviour Modification

A

Process where behaviour is changed due to experiences and environmental changes
* Classical - learning by association
* Operant - learning by reward/punishment system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who discovered Classical Conditioning?

A

Ivan Pavlov

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Classical Conditioning Function

A

Process of repeatedly pairing a neutral stimulus with a natural response - eventually elicit the desired response from the neutral stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Classical Conditioning Equation

A

Unconditioned Stimulus (UCS) - Uncondidtioned Response (UCR) - Neutral Stimulus (NS) - Conditioned Stimulus (CS) - Conditoned Response (CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Classical Conditioning Equation (Extra)

A
  • UCS causes UCR
  • automatically, naturally, untrained, untaught, universally
  • NC becomes CS
  • starts neutral, than changes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who discovered Operant Conditioning?

A

B.F Skinner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Operant Conditioning Function

A
  • operates on a reward - punishment basis
  • systems of rewards and punishments can change behaviour
  • uses positive and negative reinforcement
    “rewarding behaviour is likely to occur” - Edward Thorndike’s “Law of Effect”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Operant Conditioning Equation

A

Spontaneous Behaviour (SB) - Consequence (C) - Stimulus (S) - Response (R)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Operant Conditioning with Children

A
  • parents shape children’s action using operant conditioning: didnt finish dinner = no dessert
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Learning by Observation

A
  • conditioning minimizes how much is learned through observation and modeling
    ex. Albert Bandura’s “Bobo Doll Study”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Part Three: Social Persuation Theory

A

all types of behaviour modification shape our behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Robert Cialdini

A
  • outlines the 6 levels of influence used by marketers to elicit automatic responses
  • argues humans rely on mental shortcuts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Level 1: Reciprocation

A

rooted in the social belief that we should repay in kind what others do for us
ex. free samples of products

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Level 2: Commitment and Consistency

A

created by two general characteristics:
1. inner desire to meet out commitments
2. dislike appearing inconsistent
both drive people to become attached to something once they’ve committed to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Level 3: Liking

A
  • more likely to buy from those we like - like those who are similar to us
17
Q

Level 4: Social Proof

A

human behaviour

18
Q

Liking vs Social Proof

A

Liking: small scale, direct connection, persuaded by someone (similar) that we know
Social Proof: large scale; broad social observations; general influence

19
Q

Level 5: Authority

A
  • most people obey those in authority - more likely to ober those we trust
20
Q

Level 6: Scarcity

A

Human thought:
- opportunities seem more valuable when their availability is limited”

21
Q

Define Stereotype

A

a belief about the personal attributes of a group of people

22
Q

Define Prejudice

A

an attitude towards a person because of their group membership

23
Q

Define Discrimination

A

behaviour or action towards a group or its members

24
Q

Overt vs Subtle

A

Overt: out in the open
Subtle: less obvious

25
Q

1970s Experiment With Whites

A
  • group of white people watch a black man being pushed around by white men - seen as “playing aroud”; “horsing aroud”
  • group of white people watch a white man being pushed around by black men - seen as “violent”; “aggression”
26
Q

The 2 Social Discrimination Theories

A
  1. Socialization
    2.
27
Q

Socialization

A

stereotypes are taught at impressionable age especially by parents

28
Q

Jane Elliott

A

American diversity educator and school teacher in Iowa

29
Q

Blue eyes/Brown eyes Experiment

A
  • the kids are told that Blue eyed kids are better (they get more recess, extra serving of lunch etc)
  • Blue eyes kids begin to other the Brown eyed kids
  • Next day the role is switched.
30
Q

Impact on those facing discrimination

A
  1. lack of control; helplessness; increased anxiety
  2. self-esteem; not affected
  3. mental health; higher chance of depression
  4. stereotype threat: fear one will conform to negative stereotypes
31
Q

Social Impacts

A

long-term social advantages: income, opportunities, choices

32
Q

Muzafer Sherif Study

A

Name: Robber’s Cave Experiment
- experimented on 22 boys (11-12 years old), separate them in two groups (Eagles vs Rattlers)

33
Q

Phase One of Robber’s Cave Experiment

A

In-group formation
- creates group identity, team-building

34
Q

Phase Two Robber’s Cave Experiment

A

Friction
- create conflict between the two groups
- competitions added: one group wins at the expense of others
- name-calling, cabin raids, food fights

35
Q

Phase Three of Robber’s Cave Experiment

A

Integration
- remixing the groups (doesnt work)
- mutual cooperation approach (works) - creates crisis to promote team work

36
Q

Aislinn Bohren Experiment

A

Defines discrimination as “differences in observable outcomes (wages, hiring, evaluation) that cannot be attributed directly to underlying differences in performance.”

37
Q

Possibility #1: Taste-Based Discrimination

A
  • rooted in dislike for the group
38
Q

Possibility #2: Belief-Based Discrimination

A
  • expect different performance outcomes between groups
  • no preference or dislike for the group
  • action: judge an individual’s likely outcome based on the belief about group membership
39
Q
A