Unit 3 Section B Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

How does this section work?

A

2 parts of this, divided into environmental psychology and criminal psychology
For part = 10 marker, 15 marker, 10 marker

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Part A question

A

Outline a key study and then apply the findings to explain something (the conclusions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What approach is needed for part a?

A

Half the time spent on describing the study
Half the time spent applying it to explain something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What to include in the description of the study for part a?

A

The aim, the sample, sample method, experimental design, procedure, data collection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What to include in the application of the study in part a?

A

Suggest 2 results and what these say about the findings thus 2 explanations we can take away on the specific topic at hand

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is part a marked?

A

10 marks in total
5 marks for description, 5 marks for application of findings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Part b questions

A

Discuss a methodological issue/debate in relation to research into one of the topics in environmental/criminal psychology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What mnemonic is needed for part b questions?

A

‘A DOT and 3 PEECs’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Part b: what is the DOT?

A

Definition of the term( methodological issue/debate we are asked about)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What debates could we be asked about in part b?

A

Nature-nurture, individual-situational, reductionism-holism, free will-determinism, ethics, usefulness, social sensitivity, psychology as a science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Part B: what are the 3 PEECs?

A

3x point, example, explanation, counter argument

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In the 3 PEECs, what should the point be?

A

A general point
Research into _ can be seen as supporting this side of a debate/ having this methodological issue if…
But does not mention specific study and is VAGUE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

In the 3 PEECs, what should the example be?

A

A link to the key research or additional research that will demonstrate the original point made
Do NOT go into too much detail, just 1 sentence needed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In the 3 PEECs, what should the explanation be?

A

Explain how the example of research given shows why it supports one side of a debate or demonstrates a methodological issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In the 3 PEECs what should the counter argument be?

A

A general counter to why we could argue the research actually supports the other side of the debate OR why it’s good we have this methodological issue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is part c?

A

Presented with a hypothetical scenario where we need to apply research to help solve a problem

17
Q

How to answer part c?

A

Suggestion, implementation, rationale

18
Q

Mnemonic to remember how to answer part c?

A

3 SIRs
3 suggestions, implementation and rationale

19
Q

Part c: suggestion

A

Make a general suggestion about what you could do
MENTION THE HYPOTHETICAL SCENARIO FOR EACH SO IT HAS CONTEXT

20
Q

Part c: implementation

A

How could we apply the suggestions? Link to the hypothetical scenario and go into detail about how we will actually do it

21
Q

Part c: rationale

A

Why should we use this suggestion? Link to previous research: additional/key research in the area or anywhere else like behaviourism or other theories learnt in unit 2

22
Q

Application for reducing environmental NOISE stress

A

Reduce how much it’s heard = black and black showed chronic exposure negatively affects you
Make it more predictable = Glass and singer showed lower tolerance to frustration with unpredictable noise
RET = linked to RET therapy

23
Q

Application for reducing environmental temperature stress

A

Cool down somehow eg ACs, fans etc = Kenrick and Macfarlane found hotter means more hostility
Remove self from crowds = high density crowd in Ludenberg caused more stress
RET therapy

24
Q

Application to increase conservation behaviour/ recycling

A

Increase proximity to recycling tools = Luyben and Bailey found 52% increase in recycling
Pos reinforcement = rewards system used in Oregon found massive increase if you give a few cents for recycling
Social norm message = Cialdini found 41% will recycle towels
Positive framing = more affective in increasing attitudes to recycling

25
Q

Application for a workplace design using ergonomics

A

Change colour of walls to purple = Higuera-Trujillo found significantly better performance for cognitive tasks
Reduce any stress caused by heat = Kenrick and Macfarlane
Use graphical displays>numerical displays
Reduce noise stress