Unit 3 | Motivational assessment Flashcards
How can we know if someone is motivated?
Motivation can be analyzed at different levels or planes of analysis, including:
Physiological
Individual
Social
Philosophical
What are the motivation measurement techniques based on?
Motivation measurement techniques are based on the measurement of:
Observable Behavior
Physiological Responses
Subjective States (Self-Report)
What is meant by “Observable Behavior” in motivation measurement?
Observable behavior refers to the visible actions or reactions of an individual that indicate motivation, such as task completion, energy levels, or participation in activities.
What are “Physiological Responses” in motivation measurement?
Physiological responses refer to changes in the body that are linked to motivation, such as heart rate, hormone levels, or brain activity, which can indicate states of arousal or stress tied to motivation.
What are “Subjective States (Self-Report)” in motivation measurement?
Subjective states involve self-reports from individuals, such as surveys or questionnaires, where they rate or describe their feelings, thoughts, and levels of motivation.
What is the assessment of motivated behavior based on?
The assessment of motivated behavior is based on observable behavior, which can be inferred from publicly reported actions or behaviors that are spontaneously emitted by the subject.
What are the types of measures for assessing observable behavior?
The types of measures for assessing observable behavior include:
Frequency: Response rate, or the number of times the behavior is emitted in a given time (commonly used with animals).
Accuracy: Number of successes/misses, degree of efficiency in performing a task, number of attempts, and proportion of successes/false alarms.
Election: Actions of free choice, or the preference for one option among several possible choices.
Temporary: Response time, persistency, and effort put into a task.
What is measured under “Frequency” in assessing motivated behavior?
Frequency measures the response rate, or the number of times a behavior is emitted in a given time. This is one of the most common measures, particularly in studies with animals.
What does “Accuracy” measure in motivated behavior assessment?
Accuracy measures:
Number of successes/misses in completing a task.
Degree of efficiency in performing the task.
Number of attempts made.
Proportion of successes versus false alarms.
What is assessed under “Election” in motivated behavior?
Election measures the actions of free choice. This refers to the individual’s preference for one option among several possible choices, reflecting motivational preferences.
What does “Temporary” measure in the context of motivated behavior?
Temporary measures include:
Response Time: The speed at which a behavior is performed.
Persistency: How long the individual continues the behavior.
Effort: The amount of energy or resources put into performing the task.
How can we assess Homer’s motivation to work from home?
We can assess Homer’s motivation by observing his behavior through measurable indicators such as:
Frequency: How often he works from home.
Accuracy: How efficiently he completes tasks or avoids mistakes while working from home.
Persistence: How long he stays focused or continues working despite distractions or challenges.
Choice: Whether he actively chooses to work from home over other alternatives (such as going to the office).
What behavioral indicators can be used to determine Homer’s motivation to work from home?
Behavioral indicators to assess Homer’s motivation to work from home include:
Frequency: The amount of time he spends working from home.
Accuracy: His level of success in completing tasks without errors.
Persistence: How long he works without getting distracted or giving up.
Choice: Whether he actively opts for working from home over other options.
How can we measure Homer’s persistence in working from home?
Homer’s persistence can be measured by:
Response Time: How quickly he starts or continues tasks after interruptions.
Effort: The level of energy he puts into his work tasks despite potential distractions or difficulties.
Duration: How long he stays focused on his tasks when working from home.
How can we assess Homer’s accuracy in working from home?
Homer’s accuracy can be assessed by:
Number of successes/misses: How often he successfully completes tasks versus making mistakes.
Degree of efficiency: How well he performs tasks within the required time frame.
Proportion of successes/false alarms: The ratio of correct work compared to errors.
What are the limitations of assessing motivated behavior through observable behavior?
The limitations of assessing motivated behavior through observable behavior include:
Variability of the Response Time: Response time can vary due to situational factors or individual differences.
Difficulty in Differentiating Errors from Successes: It’s challenging to distinguish
How can the variability of response time impact the assessment of motivated behavior?
Variability in response time can be affected by:
Situational Factors: External circumstances, such as distractions or task complexity, may influence how quickly the subject responds.
Subject Factors: Individual differences, such as mood or fatigue, can also impact response time.
Why is it difficult to differentiate errors from successes in motivated behavior assessments?
It’s difficult to differentiate errors from successes because tasks, such as preference judgments, often involve subjective interpretations that may not have clear-cut right or wrong answers, making it harder to evaluate accuracy and success clearly.
What are some possible solutions to address limitations in assessing motivated behavior?
Possible solutions to address these limitations include:
Provide Clear Instructions: Ensuring the subject understands the task can reduce errors and variability in response time.
Schedule Practice/Familiarization Trials: Giving the subject practice opportunities can help minimize errors and increase consistency.
Use Designs in Which the Subject is His or Her Own Control: Comparing a subject’s performance over time can help identify individual trends and minimize variability.
What is the relationship between physiological responses and motivated behavior?
Physiological responses play a key role in assessing motivated behavior by measuring how the body reacts to stimulating situations. These responses help us understand the underlying processes that drive behavior in both animals and humans.
What does physiological psychology focus on in the context of motivated behavior?
Physiological psychology, or psychophysiology, focuses on studying how physiological processes, such as brain activity, heart rate, and hormone levels, mediate and influence motivated behavior in both animals and humans.
What structures mediate motivated behavior?
Motivated behavior is mediated by various physiological structures, including:
The Brain: Especially areas like the hypothalamus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex, which regulate emotions and motivation.
The Autonomic Nervous System: Controls bodily functions like heart rate and breathing, influencing arousal and motivation.
Hormonal Systems: Hormones like cortisol and adrenaline can affect motivation levels and responses to stress.
What physiological changes occur in response to certain stimulating situations?
In response to stimulating situations, several physiological changes may occur, including:
Increased Heart Rate: Often seen during excitement or stress.
Increased Breathing Rate: Associated with heightened arousal or effort.
Hormonal Release: Such as adrenaline and cortisol during stress or motivation to act.
Muscle Tension: Can indicate readiness for action in high-stakes situations.
How are physiological responses measured in motivated behavior assessments?
Physiological responses can be measured through tools like:
Heart Rate Monitors: To track changes in heart rate during different levels of motivation.
Electroencephalography (EEG): Measures brain activity and can indicate mental states tied to motivation.
Skin Conductance Sensors: Measure sweating and arousal during motivational tasks.
Hormonal Assessments: Track changes in cortisol or adrenaline levels in response to motivational stimuli.
What is electrodermal activity (EDA) and how is it related to motivated behavior?
Electrodermal activity (EDA) reflects the functioning of the endocrine sweat glands. It is influenced by thermal and psychological stimuli and is used to measure physiological responses related to motivation, stress, or emotional arousal.
What is the difference between exosomatic and endosomatic measurements of electrodermal activity?
Exosomatic: Refers to the measurement of electrodermal activity with an external electrical stimulus applied. A common example is Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) or skin conductance, where electrodes are placed on the skin to measure conductance or resistance to a small electrical stimulus.
Endosomatic: Refers to the measurement of electrodermal activity without an external electrical stimulus. It is measured through spontaneous skin potentials and is not influenced by an external electrical stimulus, reflecting the body’s natural response to stimuli.
What is the Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) and how does it measure motivated behavior?
The Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) measures the electrodermal activity by assessing skin conductance or resistance. Electrodes placed on the skin detect how much sweat is produced in response to psychological stimuli, reflecting changes in emotional arousal or motivation. It is commonly used to assess stress or emotional reactions.
What does endosomatic measurement of electrodermal activity indicate?
Endosomatic measurement of electrodermal activity involves tracking spontaneous skin potentials without applying an external electrical stimulus. It indicates natural, physiological responses to stimuli, such as emotional or motivational arousal, without the influence of an artificial external stimulus.
How does electrodermal activity reflect changes in motivation or arousal?
Electrodermal activity reflects changes in motivation or arousal by measuring sweat gland activity in response to stimuli. Increased emotional or psychological arousal (such as stress, excitement, or motivation) leads to increased skin conductance, which is measurable through GSR or other electrodermal response techniques.
What are cardiovascular measures used for in the assessment of motivated behavior?
Cardiovascular measures, such as heart rate, blood flow, and blood pressure, are used to assess physiological responses related to motivation, emotional states, and arousal, as these can vary with motivational levels and stress.
How is heart rate measured and what does it reflect in the context of motivated behavior?
Heart rate is measured by the number of cardiac contractions per minute (ECG). It can vary with the respiratory cycle and reflects arousal or stress levels. An increase in heart rate often indicates higher levels of emotional arousal, motivation, or physical exertion.
What does blood flow indicate in motivated behavior assessments?
Blood flow measures the dilation or contraction of blood vessels. Changes in blood flow reflect how the body responds to psychological or emotional stimuli, such as motivation, stress, or arousal. Increased blood flow typically occurs during times of heightened motivation or excitement.
What does blood pressure measure in relation to motivated behavior?
Blood pressure refers to the force of blood against the walls of the blood vessels, measured in two phases:
Systolic Pressure: The pressure when the heart contracts.
Diastolic Pressure: The pressure when the heart is at rest between beats.
Blood pressure changes can indicate levels of motivation, stress, or emotional arousal, with higher press
What are the limitations of using physiological responses to assess motivated behavior?
The limitations of using physiological responses include:
Indirect Measures of the Motivational Process: Physiological responses may not directly reflect motivation and could be influenced by other factors.
Indices of Various Psychological Processes: Physiological responses can indicate many different psychological processes, not just motivation, making it difficult to pinpoint motivation specifically.
Questionable Psychological Significance: Some physiological responses may not have a clear or reliable connection to motivation, leading to uncertainty about their interpretation.
What is meant by indirect measures of the motivational process in physiological response assessments?
Indirect measures refer to the fact that physiological responses, such as heart rate or skin conductance, do not directly measure motivation but instead reflect a range of psychological or physiological states that could be influenced by factors like stress, emotion, or physical activity.
Why are physiological responses considered indices of various psychological processes?
Physiological responses like heart rate, blood pressure, and skin conductance are influenced by multiple psychological processes (e.g., stress, excitement, fear, and motivation), making it difficult to pinpoint which specific process is being measured.
What does it mean when the psychological significance of physiological responses is considered questionable?
It means that physiological responses may not always have a clear or consistent link to motivation. Other psychological or physiological factors, such as anxiety or physical exertion, can cause similar responses, making it hard to interpret the specific motivational significance.
What are some possible solutions to address the limitations of physiological response measurements?
Possible solutions include:
Using More Than One Psychophysiological Measure: Combining multiple measures (e.g., heart rate, skin conductance, and blood pressure) can provide a more accurate assessment of motivation.
Continuous Measurement: Continuously monitoring physiological responses over time can help identify consistent patterns and better correlate changes with motivational shifts.
What is self-reporting in the context of assessing motivated behavior?
Self-reporting refers to standardized techniques where individuals report their own thoughts, feelings, or activities, often through questionnaires, scales, or standardized tests. It is commonly used to assess subjective experiences related to motivation.
What are some advantages of using self-reporting for assessing motivated behavior?
Advantages of self-reporting include:
Older Procedure: A well-established and widely used method in psychological research.
Useful for Assessing Unobservable Aspects: It is valuable for evaluating aspects of life or behavior that cannot be directly observed or manipulated, such as internal thoughts, emotions, or desires.
Versatility: Can evaluate both general repertoires of motives (overall motivational patterns) or specific motivations (motives for a particular task or situation).
Why is self-reporting considered an older procedure for obtaining information?
Self-reporting is considered an older procedure because it has been widely used in psychological assessments for many years. Despite the rise of newer methods like physiological and behavioral measurements, self-reports remain a standard tool for gathering subjective data.
What can self-reporting help assess that cannot be known directly?
Self-reporting is useful for assessing aspects of life that cannot be directly observed, such as:
Internal states: Thoughts, emotions, and feelings about specific experiences or situations.
Motivational tendencies: General motivations or specific drives that influence behavior but are not outwardly visible.
What types of motivations can self-reporting evaluate?
Self-reporting can evaluate:
General Repertoires of Motives: Overall motivational patterns or tendencies across different situations.
Specific Motivations: Motivations tied to a particular task, goal, or situation, such as the desire to succeed in a job or motivation to complete a particular task.
What are the types of subjective state assessments used to evaluate motivated behavior?
The types of subjective state assessments include:
Interviews
Questionnaires
Self-records
Self-observation
What is an interview as a method for assessing subjective states?
An interview involves a direct, face-to-face conversation between the researcher and the subject. It is often semi-structured, allowing for open-ended responses that provide detailed insights into the subject’s motivations, em
What is a questionnaire used to assess subjective states?
A questionnaire is a written set of questions or statements that a subject responds to, often using rating scales or Likert-type scales. This method allows for standardized data collection from multiple subjects, making it easier to compare responses across a group.
What are self-records in the context of assessing motivated behavior?
Self-records involve the subject keeping track of their own behavior or experiences over time. This method can include journaling or using tracking tools to monitor specific behaviors, actions, or feelings related to motivation. It’s often used in real-time to record behavior as it happens.
What is self-observation as a method of assessing motivated behavior?
Self-observation is a method where the subject actively observes and reflects on their own behavior and thoughts. This can be done through mental note-taking or informal reflection. It involves a more introspective approach compared to self-recording or questionaires
What are the differences between interviews, questionnaires, self-records, and self-observation?
Interviews: Involve direct interaction with the subject and allow for in-depth exploration of motivations and experiences. Responses are more flexible and can be clarified on the spot.
Questionnaires: Involve structured written responses to set questions and are easier to analyze statistically. They provide standardized data but are less flexible.
Self-records: Require the subject to track their own behavior over time, giving real-time insights into their motivations. They offer personalized, ongoing data but may lack objectivity.
Self-observation: Involves personal reflection and mental awareness of one’s actions and motivations, offering insights into internal states but often lacking structured data for analysis.
What are the three study purposes for which self-reports have been used to evaluate motivated behavior?
Self-reports have been used for three main purposes:
Analyze Basic Motives: To identify basic motivational structures shared by all humans and understand personality traits.
Check Subject-Environment Interaction: To examine how situational variables and individual motivational dispositions interact (inter-individual variability).
Analyze Mediation and Causality: To test models of relationships between variables and understand if and how they predict behavior.
What is the purpose of using self-reports to analyze basic motives shared by all human beings?
Self-reports are used to identify universal motivational structures and understand the basic motives that are common across individuals, helping researchers understand the foundational aspects of human motivation and personality.
How do self-reports help in checking how situational variables and motivational dispositions interact?
Self-reports are useful in studying how a person’s motivation interacts with situational factors (such as environment or context), helping researchers understand individual variability in response to different situations and how motivation may change depending on external circumstances.
What is the role of self-reports in analyzing mediation and causality?
Self-reports are used to test models that analyze the relationship between variables, such as determining whether changes in one variable (e.g., motivation) lead to changes in another (e.g., behavior). This helps researchers explore mediation (how one variable influences another) and causality (the cause-and-effect relationship).
What is a key limitation of using self-reports to assess motivated behavior?
One key limitation is the limited validity of self-reports as indicators of internal states. Individuals may use different names or terms to describe the same internal state, and even different people may label the same emotional or motivational experiences differently, making self-reports less consistent.
How does social desirability and self-deception affect self-reports?
Social desirability and self-deception can distort responses (R) in self-reports. Individuals may present themselves in a more favorable light or unconsciously alter their responses to align with socially accepted behaviors or attitudes, leading to inaccurate or biased results.
What impact do test characteristics (such as response format or order of presentation) have on self-report assessments?
Test characteristics such as the response format (e.g., Likert scale vs. open-ended) and order of presentation can influence the way individuals respond, affecting the reliability and validity of the self-report. Variations in these characteristics can lead to inconsistent data or bias.
What are some possible solutions to address the limitations of self-reports?
Possible solutions include:
Inclusion of Lie/Desirability Scales: These scales can help detect whether a respondent is presenting themselves in an overly favorable manner.
Use of Complementary Tests: Combining self-reports with other methods, such as behavioral observations or physiological measures, can provide a more accurate picture of motivation.
Complementing with an Interview: Pairing self-reports with structured interviews allows for more in-depth exploration of responses, providing better context and reducing the potential for misinterpretation.
