Unit 3 - Lesson 9 - Chapter 7 Flashcards
When a certification order is issued, a number of changes occur in the relationship between employers and employees. One of the most immediate changes is the
application of various sections of the labour code to ensure that the union has sufficient resources to represent all members of the bargaining unit effectively. These applications are usually reflected in contractual terms between the union and the employer, and are referred to as union security clauses.
One typical union security clause requires that
all union members pay union dues.
How are union dues usually calculated?
Dues are usually calculated either as a standard flat fee or as a percentage of the employee’s monthly or annual pay. The percentage-based calculation is more common in Canada because it bases an employee’s dues on what the employee actually earns, whereas a flat fee has more of a financial impact on lower-paid employees.
The dues check-off provision allows the union member to direct the employer to regularly
deduct union dues from his or her pay and to forward the deducted amount directly to the union. This provision exists so that the union does not have to go through the process of gathering money directly from every member after each pay period. It also ensures that the union receives its membership dues regularly and promptly.
If employees object to belonging to a union for reasons associated with their reli- gious affiliation, four provincial labour codes (those of British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, and Ontario) and the Canada Labour Code permit a religious exemption. . In order to receive a religious exemption
employees must show that their religious beliefs conflict with the general idea of union membership. Employees cannot receive a religious exemption because they object to the particular union in their workplace or to specific actions undertaken by that union.
An employee receiving a religious exemption directs the amount they would have paid in union dues to a
registered charity mutually agreed upon by the employee and the union
The principle behind the Rand formula is that
while not all employees may wish to be members of the union, all employees in a unionized workplace benefit from the contract terms the union negotiates; therefore, all employees, whether union members or not, should financially support the work of the union
After a certification order is issued, many unionized workplaces follow the closed shop or union shop model of employment
Under this union security provision, which is implemented through terms in the collective agreement, new employees must agree to join the union and to pay union dues as a condition of employment. The closed shop or union shop provision ensures that the employer will not be able to reduce the union’s membership by hiring individuals into the bargaining unit who will not join the union
Common union security provisions
Dues check-off Rand formula Closed shop/Union shop Hiring hall Union provisions to expel members
A variation on the closed shop model occurs in the skilled trades and construction employment sectors
prospective workers must already be union members before they are eligible for employment
employer must discharge an individual from employment if he or she has been expelled from union membership
This provision strengthens union security by reinforcing the expectation that all workers in the bargaining unit will be union members in good standing, or will pay union dues as a condition of employment.
Dues check-off
The employer deducts union dues from each employee’s paycheque and forwards the money to the union.
Rand formula
Employees in the bargaining unit pay union dues but choose whether or not to be union members.
Closed shop/Union shop
Employees must agree to join the union and to pay union dues as a condition of employment.
Hiring hall
The union supplies unionized employees to the employer.
Union provisions to expel members
The employer may be compelled to dismiss an employee if the union expels the employee from union membership.
It is also important to remember that as soon as a certification order is in place, individual employees become bargaining unit members and can no longer
bargain individually with the employer to establish workplace conditions. And, after union certification, the employer can no longer bargain individually with employees.
The simplest and most common bargaining structure is
“single unit–single employer,”
“single unit–single employer,”
where one union negotiates with a single employer that operates a single location
Single Location
Single Union–Single Employer & Multiple Union–Single Employer
Single Union–Single Employer
This is the most common bargaining structure in Canada. Individual unions bargain with employers operating at a single location.
Multiple Union–Single Employer
This is usually found only where multiple unions represent different groups of workers in a single workplace. This model is not common in Canada
Multiple Locations
Single Union–Single Employer & Multiple Union–Single Employer
Single Union–Single Employer
One collective agreement is negotiated and applies to all the locations where the union is certified. This model is used in many parts of the Canadian public sector.
Multiple Union–Single Employer
Different unions representing different workers negotiate with one employer for collective agreements covering all the employer’s locations. This model is used in several Canadian transportation industries
Multiple Employers
Single Union–Multiple Locations & Multiple Union–Multiple Locations
Single Union–Multiple Locations
Different employers operating in different locations negotiate as a group with a single union. This model may require the labour relations board to accredit employers to bargain as an employers’ council. This model is used in several parts of the Canadian forest industry.
Multiple Union–Multiple Locations
This highly centralized bargaining model is used mainly where there are multiple unions and employers within a single industry that operates in multiple locations. This model is relatively rare in Canada.
While most Canadian bargaining structures, as noted, involve a single employer and a single union, it is possible for groups of employers or groups of unions to bargain as a single entity. This structure is most often used when
multiple employers in a single industry feel that their interests would be better served if they bargained as a group rather than individually.
pattern bargaining or whipsawing
where an agreement reached by one union with one employer is used to pressure other employers in the same industry or that deal with the same union into agreeing to similar terms.
When a number of unions represent different employees of a single employer, the unions may decide to bargain as a group.
Unions that bargain as a group can exert greater pressure on the employer because of the increased impact of any job action they might take, such as a strike. Union members generally respect any job action taken by another union: for example, by refusing to cross the striking union’s picket lines. Thus, in a multiple union–single employer bargaining relationship, it would be possible for employees belonging to one union to go on strike and shut down the entire operations of the employer.
Most Canadian labour codes specify that employers wishing to bargain as a group must apply to a labour relations board for certification as
an employers’ council