Unit 3 - Lesson 8 Chapter 5 Flashcards
A successful organizing campaign results in
a legally recognized level of support for the union that allows it to request recognition as the bargaining agent for the employees
As bargaining agent, the union acts on behalf of
the employees in bargaining conditions and terms of work with the employer, and in administering the collective agreement that results from the bargaining.
An organizing campaign can be initiated either by a
a union or by the employees
If a union becomes aware of a group of dissatisfied employees, it may contact
the employees to see if there is already sufficient interest in pursuing unionization or if there is a good chance that the union can persuade the employees to consider unionization.
If the employees initiate the campaign
they must decide whether to start their own union or contact an established union with the intention of joining that union… most employees who initiate an organizing campaign decide to contact an established union because of the organizing experience and campaign resources that the union can offer.
What are the key steps in an organizing campaign?
- Employees will choose between an existing union or to create one. A union can also contact the employees directly
- An information meeting is held to formally assess the level of support for the union and the likelihood of an organizing campaign resulting in certification.
- Organizing committee is formed
- Organizing committee members contact workers and have union supporters sign documents to express intent to join the union
- When sufficient levels of support are reached, an application for certification is made
- The labour relations board receiving the application assesses the application and can
application for certification contains
a description of the proposed bargaining unit
signatures of those intending to join the union, and
identification of the employer and proof that the union is a bona fide union
The labour relations board receiving the application assesses the application and can
grant automatic certification (if available) order a vote in the workplace
suggest alterations to the bargaining unit, or
deny the application
The Information Meeting
The first formal step in the organizing campaign is to plan and hold an information meeting, which takes place after working hours and off company property. This is to avoid alerting the employer that there is interest in unionization, and also to avoid any suggestion that the union is interfering with the workplace’s normal operations.
At the information meeting, interested employees
discuss the issues that are generating interest in unionization with the union representative, and together they assess the likelihood that an organizing campaign would result in a majority vote of support for the union.
The Organizing Committee
The organizing committee usually consists of several employees in the workplace and, perhaps, an experienced organizer from the union who can provide assistance. The reason that the organizing committee tends to consist of employees rather than professional organizers from the union is that employees are generally considered more credible than “outsiders” in discussions about workplace issues.
Under Canadian labour law, an employer is entitled to forbid individuals who are acting on behalf of the union
from soliciting support at the workplace during working hours, for the simple reason that such activity could significantly disrupt the normal operations of the workplace.
When the organizing committee members contact other employees, their goal is to obtain a formal indication of support for the union.
This is accomplished by having employees sign a membership card or a petition indicating their intent to join the union. In some jurisdictions, employees may also be asked to pay a small sum of money, usually one or two dollars, to materially signify their support for the union.
A constant concern throughout the orga- nizing campaign is the possibility of
unfair labour practices
Unfair labour practices are a concern during the organizing campaign because
of their potential to influence the vote for or against the union in such a way that the outcome of the vote does not reflect the employees’ actual desires
The union strategies that appear to have the strongest influence on success are
the so-called rank-and-file strategies involving personal contact with members, such as telephone contacts, house calls, small group meetings, and the presence of a representative organizing committee
studies also indicated that a
combination of strategies is more likely to result in success than a single strategy, and that demographic or situational factors in individual workplaces can be more influential on success rates than the union’s actions (e.g., the higher the percentage of female and/or minority workers in the workforce, the higher the probability of success).
to be successful in organizing, unions must identify
what is important to the workers they are attempting to represent, and must present their case in a way that shows they are aware of workers’ concerns and are willing to address them.
two increasingly important factors in the success of an organizing campaign appear to be
the amount of control over the campaign exerted by the employees targeted by the campaign and the amount of participation by those employees in the campaign activities
What factors are most important in determining the success of an organizing drive?
rank-and-file strategies involving personal contact with members
amount of control over the campaign exerted by the employees targeted by the campaign
amount of participation by those employees in the campaign activities
the employer’s response to the organizing campaign
the manner in which the campaign is conducted
An analysis of American data shows that American employers faced with an organizing campaign commonly undertake five to nine tactics in response
such as hiring a consultant to help them conduct a counter-campaign, holding meetings with supervisors, and making promises of improvement. The analysis indicates that using such tactics reduces the success rate of organizing campaigns by an average of 20 percent.
The application form has three major components
an indication of sufficient membership support for the application
a description of the desired bargaining unit (the group of employees that will be represented in collective bargaining with the employer)
an indication of the employer and the trade union covered by the application
Sufficient Membership Support
The union filing a certification application must be able to show that it has sufficient support from the “employees” of the “employer” to make the application worthwhile.
a labour relations board may consider applications with less than the required level of support if the union making the application can show
that the employer commit- ted an unfair labour practice that intimidated the employees into not expressing support for the union. In such situations, a labour relations board will attempt to assess the effect of the employer’s behaviour and, depending on the result of the assessment, will allow the application to proceed, permit the union to attempt to collect further indications of support, or deny the application.
If the level of support for the certification exceeds the stated minimum but does not reach the level needed for automatic certification
the labour relations board will, after assessing the application criteria described below, require an employee vote before granting certification
The level of support required for certification applications is a part of labour legislation that tends to fluctuate in accordance with the philosophy of the government in power.
A political party with anti-union opinions is likely to raise the necessary level of support, with the justification that there must be support from a clear majority of the employees for the workplace to be unionized.
A pro-union political party is likely to lower the required level of support or to create mechanisms—such as automatic certification—that speed up the certification process.
The justification for this position is that the employer, who controls how the workplace operates and what the organization does, always holds the balance of power in a work- place