Unit 3 Flashcards
What is operationalism and logical positivism?
Traditionally, positivists took an extremely imperial stance, the only knowledge you could derive from natural phenomenon were from observable events. The logical positivists took this one step further and said that you could admitted abstract ideas into psychology, believing that the observable and theoretical could be closely linked - through operationalism. Operationalism was that scientific concepts were not to be defined in absolute terms, but in with reference to the operations used to measure them.
What are operational Definitions?
precise descriptions of the procedures for measurements and for specifying the variable. These allowed psychologists to study seemingly invisible concepts
What did Bridgman refer to as ‘pseudoprobems’?
Questions that were interesting, but were unanswerable by means of scientific observation.
What were considered problems with the use of operational definitions?
Psychologists couldn’t agree on the ‘best’ operational definition for the term, and according to Bridgman the meaning of a concept does not go beyond the operation used to describe it. So in this case different operational definitions are supposedly studying different phenomenon
What are the advantages of operational definitions?
Replication: if the terms are defined well enough, then other researchers are able to replicate the experiment - this is something that wasn’t able to be done with introspection
Converging Operations: That our understanding of a phenomenon is enhanced if several different researchers are studying it using different operational definitions that converge on the same basic conclusion
What ideas do neobehviourists have in common?
(1) They took advantage of the evolutionary assumption of continuity among species. (2) That learning (conditioning) was central to understanding behaviour - leaning heavily towards the nurture end of the nature-nurture
Molar vs. Molecular Approach to behviour? Which did Tolman emphasize?
Molar - looking at the whole picture, and molecular, looking at the individual events that make up that behaviour - dissecting it down to it’s simplest sensations. Tolman emphasized the molar approach - broad patterns of behaviour directed at the same goal - these ideas were taken from gestalt psychology
What results did Tolman’s student find with rats swimming in a maze that support a molar approach?
that it understands it as a whole and responds to the maze in terms of whole behavioural patterns and meaning beyond the component movements. That it creates a cognitive map of the environment as a whole
What was the importance of goal-directiveness for Tolman?
This was a universal feature the behaviour that we learn - it is all directed towards some goal
What did Tolman mean by purposiveness?
goal-directivness - it was used a descriptive not causal - it was used to describe the behaviour
What are intervening Variables?
hypothetical factors that are not seen directly but are inferred from the manner in which independent and dependent variables are operationally defined - they are assumed to intervene between stimulus and behaviour in a way that influences behaviour
What were referred to as sign Gestalts?
The relationship between the cues and the animals expectations about what would happen if they chose path A instead of Path B
For Tolman, what did ‘expectancies’ have to do with rats exploring and learning mazes?
As it encountered certain areas of the maze it would come to learn environmental cues and that these cues were associated with certain outcomes
What makes a measurement reliable?
That any repeated measures yield approximately the same results.
What is the phenomenon of latent learning?
affected performance. This was what reinforcement acted on - the mouse would learn the maze whether there was food at the end. So this automatic learning of the maze was what he referred to as latent learning, because it is happening under neither the surface - without direct influence on the performance
What are cognitive maps and what role do they have in learning a maze?
the overall knowledge of the maze structure and spacial pattern - the mice learn to understand the overall orientation of the maze - allowing them to take shortcuts when alternative routes are given
What criticisms were directed against Tolman?
His emphasis on purposiveness and heavy use of mentalistic variables, that there were too many intervening cognitive factors.
What is Tolman’s Field Theory?
learning did not involve the strengthening and weakening of connections, but more like a map control room, in which the animal gradually acquired a cognitive map of the environment