Unit 1 Flashcards
What are the reasons for studying history? Why study the history of psychology?
1
What is Furomoto’s distinction between old and new history?
Old: Emphasizes ‘great’ psychologists and celebrates classic studies and major break throughs
New: more inclusive, scientists are more subjective, not objective - result of the current zeitgeist.
Presentivism vs. Historicism
Presentism: asserting past in terms of present understanding, leads people to think that people in the past were less intelligent.
Historicism: evaluate the event in terms of what they knew at the time - this is a contextual approach
Internal vs. External Approach
Internal: ignores the outside influences on psychology and believes that history is intierly written within the discipline of psychology
External: considers outside influences, makes reference to them and looks at the societal, economically factors
Personalistic vs. Naturalistic
Personalistic: ‘Great man theory’ - sees actions of the individuals as prime movers of bringing about history
Naturalistic: emfatisch overal intellectual and cultural climate of the era - forces of history act on the individual.
What are the dangers of presentism?
it can let us to believe that psychologists were unintelligent and that we are superior
What is it meant by zeitgeist
the flavour of the time age and time - the spirit of the era or dominant school of thought.
What is a multiple (as used by Boring and Merton)? Which concept and approach to history does a multiple support?
when two people make the same discovery at about the same time, but without knowing.
What was the attitudes towards Church authority near the end of the renaissance?
it was beginning to be questioned, there were doubts about the geocentric view of the earth, especially with Galileo
What does a rationalist believe?
only accept as truth that which could not be doubted - the rejected the evidence of the senses, which can deceive.
What were Descarte’s rules for discovering truth?
the way to truth was through human’s capacity to reason:
(1) accept nothing as true, except if there was no reason to doubt it. (2) use analysis to break down into subproblems. (3) work form the simplest of these subproblems to more complex ones. (4) Carefully review conclusions, omitting nothing.
Innate vs. derived ideas
Innate Ideas: ideas that do not rely directly on our experiences, but as a result from our native ability to reason.
Derived Ideas: Other concepts of truths that result form our experiences.
What is Dualism?
the clear separation from the mind and body
What is the Cartesian Dichotomy? What were the differences between humans and non-human animals?
Cartesian dichotomy: divides humans and animals. Animals were simple machines - lacking in mind. Humans combined a mechanical body and the ability to reason. therefore he believed that animals only consisted of the body and the humans had both a mind and body
What does a mechanist believe?
people who believe that the body operates like a complicated machine
What is an interactionalist?
Someone who believes that the mind can influence the body
How did Descartes attempt to explain a reflex? What were the role of animal spirits?
animal spirits were found as tiny particles in the brain and nerves - so for a reflex the mend initiates the movement of animal spirits in the brain by acting the nerves controlling certain muscles and these muscles can react automatically to stimuli in the environment and thus a reflex occurs
For Descarte’s what was the importance of the pineal gland?
this was were he proposed that this is where the animal spirits were controlled, and it was the link between the mind and body
What is referred to as empiricism and associationism?
Empiristis: our knowledge of the world is constructed from our experiences and is tied to associationism because it is based on the belief that our knowledge is woven together by the associations among our experiences and ideas.
What were Locke’s arguments against the existence of innate ideas?
he believed that we had intact ‘faculties’ such as the ability to think, and that there was no need for the innate ideas because it can be shown that ideas originate from other sources requiring only our mental faculties