unit 3 Flashcards
describe a model of constrained choices
Individuals want to consume as much as possible and have
as much free time as possible.
* However, their consumption relies on working, and so
sacrificing free time
how to calculate the slope of a line
Slope = vertical change / horizontal change
what are goods
anything people care about and would like to have more of
what is a trade off
when you choose one thing which causes you to have to give up, or sacrifice, another
5 facts about indifference curves realtive to the constrained choice graph
- Indifference curves correspond to higher utility levels: if you are indifferent between two combination, the combination that has more of one good must have less of the other good
- Higher indifference curves correspond to higher utility levels: as we move up and to the right in the diagram, further away from the origin, we move to combinations with more of both goods
- Indifference curves are usually smooth: small changes in the amounts of goods don’t cause big jumps in utility
- Indifference curves do not cross
- As you move to the right along an indifference curve, it becomes flatter
assumptions of the karim model
Karim doesn’t care about the future, so does not save any of his
earnings.
Karim cannot borrow so his average spending cannot exceed his
earnings.
what is marginal rate os substitution
Definition: The trade-off that a person is willing to make between two goods. At any point, the MRS is the absolute value of the slope of the indifference curve
This is the slope of the indifference curve at any point
The marginal rate of substitution is the reduction in his level of consumption that would keep Karim’s utility constant following a one hour increase of free time
.
what is marginal rate of transformation
- The marginal rate of transformation (MRT) is the rate at which Karim can transform free time into consumption.
- This is the opportunity cost of one unit of free time.
- Definition: the quantity of a good that must be sacrificed to acquire one additional unit of another good. At any point, it is the absolute value of the slope of the feasible frontier
The slope of the feasible frontier - corresponds to wage - determines the size of the trade off karim faces: how much consumption is given up in return for an extra hour of free time (opportunity cost)
what is marginal utility
This is the rate of change in the utility as the mount of good increases
what does a budget contained show
what options are possible
The budget constraint in the contained choice graph shows the relationship between income and hours of work, the slope of the line corresponds to the wage, the slope is negative.
feasible set and feasible frontier
Feasible set is all feasible points on a graph
feasible frontier is the line that shows the best choices
what are the two trade offs under scarcity
- The marginal rate of substitution (MRS) measures the tradeoff that a person is willing to make between 2 goods
- The marginal rate of transformation (MRT) measures the
trade-off that a person is constrained to make by the feasible frontier.
what is the effect of a higher wage
Higher wages raise the opportunity cost of free time: this makes it more
costly to take free time compared to consumption, and will make people
work more
Higher wages make people richer: this new income can be used to buy the two things people like, free time and consumption. Being richer will make people work less
Changes your trade-off between free time and consumption
The slope of the feasible frontier is steeper: new marginal rate of transformation
why does income or substitution effect dominate
If the income effect dominates, the person values free time more with higher income and works less.
If the substitution effect dominates, the higher opportunity cost of free time encourages them to work more.
For some, these effects may balance out, leading to little change in work or leisure hours.
what is income effect
- The income effect (because the budget constraint shifts
outwards): the effect that the additional income would have
if there were no change in the opportunity cost.