Unit 2: Risk Analysis Flashcards

1
Q

Risk Analysis Data

A

Ten year fire data of line of duty deaths

Provided by US Fire Administration (USFA) and NFPA

Multiple sources of data: USFA, NFPA, CDC, National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), IAFF, and National Fallen Firefighters Foundation (NFFF)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

US Fire Administration (USFA)

A

Official data repository

One year behind current year

Impacts funding(AFG grant, SAFER) and prevention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)

A

Works with USFA

Death and injury data

Provides analysis of data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Center for Disease Control/National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

A

Performs all LODD firefighter fatality investigations

Provides in depth analysis/causes

Recommends corrective actions/ describes safety implications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

International Association of Firefighters

A

Represents add organized labor

International data is included

Advocates/actively participates in fatality reviews/data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

National Fallen Firefighters Foundation

A

Advocacy for LODD benefits/ families

Training for risk avoidance

Reviews data and collaborates with public safety officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

5 Steps of Risk Management

A
  1. Risk identification
  2. Risk evaluation
  3. Risk control techniques (Prioritization of risks and threats)
  4. Risk management monitoring
  5. Program review and evaluation

Outlined in NFPA 1500

  1. IDENTIFY potential risks or threats.
  2. EVALUATION risk or threat and consequenses to the public, property, environment, and responders.
  3. PRIORITIZATION of the threats and risks
  4. DEVELOPMENT and IMPLEMENTATION of control measures.
  5. MONITORING effectiveness of control measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Risk Management Steps: Risk Identification

A

What might go wrong?

Primary role of ISO

Ongoing observation

Responsibility of all responders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Risk Management Steps: Risk Evaluation

A

Frequency: likelihood of occurrence

Severity: How bad is the risk?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Prioritizing Risk

A

Is there a high probability of risk?

Could there be serious injury or death?

What are other consequences?

ISO makes determination with IC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Risk Management Steps: Risk Control Techniques

A

Solutions for elimination or mitigation of potential problems

Implantation of best solution

Eliminate or avoid the activity

Reduce or control the risk

Develop, adopt and enforce safety programs and SOPs

Provide training

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Risk Management Steps: Monitoring Control Measures

A

Evaluate to measure effectiveness

Reduce risk to lower frequency

Reduce consequences to lower risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Risk Management Steps: Program Review and Evaluation

A

Periodic evaluations should be made to determine the effectiveness of plan and ID modifications that should be made

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Hazard

A

Condition, material or situation that has a potential to harm personnel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Risk

A

Likelihood that a hazard will cause harm to personnel based or proximity, tactics, or protective measures being employed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Risk-Benefit Analysis

A

The value of taking action vs taking no action to avoid risk

There’s a basic level of risk which must be measured and controlled

Potential for consequences from a risk strategy implementation

17
Q

When is there no acceptable level of risk?

A

When there’s no potential to save lives or property

18
Q

3 Primary Means of Reducing Risk

A
  1. Administrative controls
  2. Engineering controls
  3. Personal protective equipment (PPE)
19
Q

Means of Reducing Risk: Administrative Controls

A

Controls that provide avoidance of the hazard or risk during ops involving hazards

(Safety zones, crew rotation, and rehabilitative efforts)

20
Q

Means of Reducing Risk: Engineering Controls

A

Controls directly related to removing hazards from operational area

Ex: ventilation, control of energy sources (electricity), lockout ragout procedures

21
Q

Means of Reducing Risk: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)

A

Used to provide protection from hazards that can’t be mitigated during operations

22
Q

Golden Rule

A

Risk a lot to save a lot, risk a little to save a little

23
Q

ICS Form 215A, Incident Action Plan Safety Analysis

A

Purpose is to aid ISO in completing an operational risk assessment to prioritize hazards, safety and health issues, and to develop appropriate controls

When risk and hazards are involved: mitigation’s or controls should be made to safeguard responders and personnel should be briefed on hazards, mitigation’s and related measures

Closely link to Form 215, Operational Planning Worksheet

24
Q

When is ICS Form 215A, Incident Action Plan Safety Analysis Typical Prepared

A

During incident action planning cycle

When Operations Section Chief is prepared for tactics meeting, ISO collabs with OSC to complete form

25
Q

ICS Form 208, Safety Message/Plan

A

Optional form that may be included and completed by the Safety Officer for the Incident Action Plan (IAP)

Will be reproduced with IAP and given to all recipients as part of IAP

All completed origins form must be given to documentation unit

26
Q

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)

A

Part of the department of labor and is tasked with creating and enforcement of workplace laws

Created in 1970, by the Williams-Steiger Act