Unit 2 Part 2 Flashcards
What are the two parts to guilt?
Actus reus (the guilty act) and mens rea (the guilty mind).
What does the prosecution have to prove to find someone guilty of a crime?
1) That a criminal act occured (actus reus “wrongful act”)
2) Accused intended to comment the crime (mens rea “guilty mind”)
What three things does actus reus include?
1) a voluntary action
2) an omission (failure to act)
3) state of being that is prohibited (possession of stolen goods, break-in tools, or being in a gaming house)
* any of these acts have to be voluntary, not forced actions or done by reflex
At a criminal vital, the Crown prosecutor moves foreward in what two stages?
1) to prove the accused was the one to commit the crime
2) then try to prove intent or knowledge
What are the three parts to intent (mens rea)?
1) meant to do it
2) was reckless
3) and knew or could foresee the results
What are the two kinds of intent?
1) general intent: committing a wrongful act with no other ulterior motive (like causing the death of someone in a bar fight)
2) specific intent: committing a wrongful act for the purposes of committing another (like committing assault for the purpose of robbing them)
What are the 6 parts to mens rea?
1) intention
2) criminal state of mind
3) willful blindness
4) recklessness
5) criminal negligence
6) knowledge
What is intention? What words do charges often include?
The crime must be done with intent or purpose. Charges often include the words “willfully” and “intentionally”.
What is criminal state of mind?
The accused may not always tend on the outcome, but they are aware their actions are illegal, meaning they have a “criminal state of mind”
Ex. While stealing something you cause damage to property, so you are guilty of theft and mischief
What is willful blindness?
Deliberately closing your mind to possible consequences of your actions or pretending not to know something. I fyouturn around and pretend not to see something but really know what is going on you are demonstrating willful blindness. A reasonable person would be suspicious and ask which is why it counts as “intent”.
What is recklessness?
This is a careless disregard for possible results of actions. Consciously taking a.n unjustifiable risk that a reasonable person would not take. Intent does not need to be proven to prove mens rea in this situtation.
Ex. Driving without legally-required prescription eye glasses and causing an accident.
What is criminal negligence?
This is different from the civil category or negligence (or tort). This involves a criminal level of negligence where you caused harm unintentionally but it was as a result of the wanton (cruel) and reckless disregard for the lives and safety of others. A reasonable person would not demonstrate such cruelty and recklessness or would have taken precautions to avoid causing harm to another. If a reasonable, objective analysis was made and the act would carry risk of harm, then the person was negligent.
Ex. Leaving a loaded gun around with kids in the area.
What does the Supreme Court fo Canada have to define for criminal negligence?
State of mind
What section of the criminal code relates to criminal negligence?
S. 291
What is knowledge?
Knowledge of certain facts can also provide the necessary mens rea. The Crown does not have to prove there was intent to commit a certain crime, only knowledge of an aspect of the crime.
Ex. The criminal code says knowingly using an outdated or cancelled credit card means guilt of the indictable offence of fraud.
What is motive?
Is motive direct evidence?
- Reason they did something
- Motive is indirect or circumstantial evidence
What is the difference between motive and intent?
Motive: the reason they did something
Intent: their state of mind and willingness to break the law.
Does having a motive to commit andpffense establish the guilty mind of the accused?
No because motive is not knowledge
During a trial, the crown may try to prove___that is ___or___evidence.
- motive
- indirect
- circumstantial
What happens if there is no conclusive evidence to prove the offence but the prosecutor can prove motive?
A guilty verdict may be given
Which is more important to prove, intent or motive?
Intent
What is attempt?
Even if the illegal act Gail’s, the accused may still be guilty of a criminal offence.
What does proving attempt mean?
There was the intent to commit an offence
Where does the actus reus for an attempt begin? Who decides when the preparation stage ends and the attempt stage begins?
It begins with the first step toward committing a crime. The judge decides when the preparation stage ends and the attempt stage begins.
What happens if a prosecutor cannot prove an offence was committed but can prove an attempt was made?
The accused can be charged with attempt.
What happens if the accused is only charged with attempt but it can be proven the offence occured?
The judge may order the accused to be charged with the attempt itself.