Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

AS Politics > Unit 2 - Parliament > Flashcards

Unit 2 - Parliament Flashcards

0
Q

How does parliament award legitimacy to the govt?

A
  • the people elect representatives to the commons
    2. Gain legitimacy from the people
    3. Govt drawn from parliament
    And thus govt is legitimate
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

What are the main functions of parliament?

A
  1. Representation
  2. Legitimacy
  3. Scrutiny
  4. Legislation
  5. Recruitment and training
  6. Debate and deliberation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Parliament carries out its representative function (3)

A
  1. Elected commons with a wide range of constituencies (650 seats)
  2. Many methods of representation
  3. Follows Burkean model well. No need for descriptive representation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Parliament does not carry out its representative function (3)

A
  1. Composition is not proportional
  2. Unelected Lords undermine representation - lack of mandate
  3. Socially un representing - 22% women, 4% ethnic minorities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Functions of both Lords and Commons

A
  1. Approval of legislation
  2. Accountability of government
  3. Scrutiny of legislation
  4. Debating key political issues
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Functions of the Lords

A
  1. Delaying legislation for at least a year
  2. Representing various interests and causes in society
  3. Scrutiny of legislation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a Presidential government?

A

A form of government whereby the executive and legislature are separate and elected separately.
The president does not sit in the legislature.
- President is accountable to the people due to personal mandate (not to the legislature)
- Constitutional rules establish limits on presidential power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Does the executive dominate parliament? YES

A
  1. Govt can claim a mandate from the people and hence Parliament must accept the governments legitimate right to rule
  2. Govts usually have a clear majority in Commons (aside from coalitions)
  3. Governments whip MPs to gain or maintain support within the Commons.
  4. Many MPs seek promotion and do this by remaining loyal to governing party (patronage)
  5. House of Lords power is reduced
    1949 parliament act limits them to only being able to delay legislation for 1 year.
    1911 parliament act prevents lords from interfering in financial matters
    Salisbury convention is considered to be binding - stated that lords must not obstruct government policies that were part of manifesto
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does the executive dominate parliament? No

A
  1. Parliament is sovereign - can veto legislation
  2. Govt can be removed through vote of no confidence (1979 James Callaghan after period of industrial unrest and economic problems)
  3. Parliament has the power to scrutinise and amend legislation
  4. Governments have no chance against significant parliamentary opposition
  5. House of Lords retains independence as there is no government majority and patronage is weaker. It can defy the will of the govt.
  6. Departmental select committees need public bill committees scrutinise government.
  7. MPs and peers call govt to account (PMQT)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Examples of parliament defying the government

A
  1. 1979 James Callaghan vote of no confidence
  2. 1986 shops bill - only time in Thatchers period in office where the government lost a vote on major legislation. Proposed to allow more shops to be open on Sundays. A lot of opposition within Conservative
    party
  3. 1994 VAT rise defeat - john major’s proposal to raise the rate of VAT on fuel and energy
  4. 2005 and 2008 detention of terror suspects ( 2005 - Blair attempted to extend the period to 90 days - commons. 2008 - brown attempted to extend to 42 days - lords)
  5. 2011 fixed term parliament act (defeated by House of Lords)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Departmental Select Committees

A
  1. Consists of 11-13 backbench MPs
  2. Oversees work of govt departments
  3. Can question ministers, civil servants and other witnesses or call for official papers
  4. Produces unanimous reports that cross party lines
    - SCRUTINY
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Public Accounts Committee

A
  1. Chaired by opposition backbencher

2. Investigates financial aspects of govt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Legislative committees of the commons

A

15-40 backbenchers

  • amend legislation and scrutinise
  • have a government majority
  • rarely pass amendments against government wishes
  • largely ineffective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Legislative committee of the Lords

A
  1. 15+ members
  2. Contains peers who are experts
  3. Weaker party discipline
  4. Pass significant amendments to improve legislation
  5. Often defy governments wishes
  6. Amendments are subject to approval in the commons
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Positives of commons representation

A

Active MPs who represent constituents. Also represent pressure groups and associations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Negatives of commons representation

A

Commons is not socially representative.
Party loyalty distorts representation.
Party composition in commons does not reflect on support for parties (disproportionality)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Positives of commons accountability

A

MPs regularly question ministers. Liaison committee questions prime minister twice a year.
Departmental select committees.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Negatives of commons accountability

A

PMQT is just entertainment.
Whipped MPs fear of being disloyal.
Hard to hold one party to account under a coalition

18
Q

Positives of commons scrutiny

A

Effective departmental select committees. 44% of recommendations made by them have been enacted by govt. Rise in pay for committees to provide incentive. Lessens pressure for independent minded MPs who want to further their careers without bowing down to party pressure.

20 opposition days - 2009 Labour Party defeated in opposition day motion on Gurkhas.
Public accounts committee headed by opposition MP

19
Q

Negatives of commons scrutiny

A

Lack of time

Whipped legislative committees

20
Q

Positives of commons legislation

A

Legitimate as govt majority have mandate.
Laws are legitimised in parliament as MPs consent on behalf of the people
Commons can veto legislation that is against public interests
- legislation can be passed quickly if needed eg terrorism act took 1 month

21
Q

Positives of commons checking govt power

A

Can veto legislation

22
Q

Negatives of commons checking govt powers

A

Party loyalty and discipline means that MPs are reluctant to challenge govt

23
Q

Positives of lords representation and negatives

A

Many sections of society are represented by peers who have links and experience and knowledge

Negatives - unelected. Who are they representing? No mandate or accountability. Socially in representing

24
Q

Positives and negatives of lords accountability

A

Pos - peers are more independent minded. Less party loyalty

Cons - departmental select committees do not exist in lords so govt cannot be scrutinised

25
Q

Positives and negatives of lord scrutiny

A

Legislative committees in lords are more effective as there is less party discipline and less party loyalty.
Peers are experienced and knowledgable

Cons - commons can ultimately overturn lords recommendations as lords has reduced power

26
Q

Pros and cons of lords legislation

A

Pros - scrutiny by peers who are experts. Laws are more legitimate
2010-2012 80 bills examined with 10,031amendments considered

Cons - unelected so cannot legitimise laws

27
Q

Pros and cons of lords debate

A

More time than commons
Peers have expertise

Cons - no legislative power so debates are largely symbolic

28
Q

Pros and cons of lords checking govt power

A

Pros - govt cannot control members of lords due to lack of partisanship

Cons - ultimately commons and the govt are more powerful and can by pass lords

29
Q

Bills passed without lords approval

A

War crimes act 1991
European Parliamentary act 1999
Hunting act 2004

30
Q

Methods of scrutiny

A
  1. Legislative scrutiny - PAC, headed by opposition MP
  2. PMQT, Questions to ministers for oral and written answer
  3. Select committees
  4. Debates
31
Q

How are finance and constitutional bills scrutinised?

A

Committee of the whole House of Commons meaning every MP takes part

32
Q

Example of poor legislation

A

Dangerous dogs act 1991/1997
- too rushed with too many loopholes
Voted as one of the word pieces of legislation
Passed quickly in response to public pressure

33
Q

Problems of public bill committees

A
  1. Committee of selection is dominated by party whips
  2. Experts excluded
  3. Govt has an advantage
  4. Not permanent - poor expertise
  5. Selection reflects party leadership
  6. Independent minded MPs excluded
34
Q

Problem with private member bills

A

Only 13 Fridays a year allocated - little time.
Most MPs return to constituencies on Fridays meaning that there is low attendance for debates on PMBs
Opponents can filibuster

35
Q

Evidence of small support for PMBs

A

Out of 2067 between 1983-2002 only 256 received royal assent

36
Q

Liaison committee

A
  • chairs of all committees and joint committee on human rights
  • considers general matters in the commons (eg investigating effectiveness of select committees)
  • since 2002, questions PM 2 times a year, requesting evidence on govt policy

Tony Blair in 2002. First time pm given evidence for 65 years

37
Q

Significant PMB legislation

A

Murder act 1965
Abortion act 1967
Sexual offences act 1967
Autism act 2009

38
Q

How have select committees been made more independent?

A

Since 2010, members are voted rather than being proposed by committee of selection

39
Q

The uk should have an elected second chamber

A
  1. Thy would be more democratically legitimate with a mandate.
  2. Widen representation
  3. More authority allowing it to check the power of commons more effectively
  4. Better legislation
  5. End executive tyranny
40
Q

The UK should not have an elected second chamber

A
  1. Gridlocked government
  2. Small c conservative argument
  3. Peers hold more expertise
  4. Obstruct the government
  5. Apathy and voter fatigue if faced with too many elections
  6. Partisanship
  7. Lack of descriptive representation
41
Q

Reforms to the Lords

A

1999 - removal of hereditary peers
2001 - white paper recommended 20% elected
2006 - loan for peerages scandal gave impetus for reform

42
Q

Arguments for the lords

A
  1. Check on power (especially during landslide majority governments)
  2. Expertise
  3. Independence from partisanship
  4. Small c conservative
  5. Quality of committee work is high
  6. Final constitutional safeguard against government of the day
43
Q

Arguments against the lords

A
  1. Unelected, unaccountable and un democratic.
  2. Weakened independence due to power of patronage of PM
  3. Hereditary peers
  4. Under representation of women (18% of women)
    5.

AS Politics (8 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions